Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If New York Is Nuked
NewsMax ^ | November 9, 2001 | Christopher Ruddy

Posted on 11/09/2001 2:18:51 AM PST by MeekOneGOP

If New York Is Nuked

Christopher Ruddy
Friday, Nov. 9, 2001
With all of the talk, some very serious from President Bush, about terrorists getting and using weapons of mass destruction against Americans, one would think the public should be prepared in case such a weapon is used.

This past week, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said emphatically that if the terrorist groups get a nuclear bomb, they will detonate it in New York.

So, let's suppose a suitcase nuke is detonated in Manhattan.

What should the civilians living in and around New York do? Should they flee outside the city? Should they run to their basements?

It's also evident that an ounce of preparation now will do much more than pounds of after-the-fact rescue efforts.

For some strange reason, our government is very reluctant to prepare its citizens for such a calamity, though acknowledging that such a calamity is not only possible, it's probable.

Certainly the best defense against the use of such weapons should take place in intelligence and with our spies infiltrating terrorist networks.

We discovered on Sept. 11, however, that thanks to Bill Clinton, America no longer has any real intelligence about these groups.

The next layer of defense against such an attack is to hold the governments behind these terrorists accountable – but it's not clear that will be the case. Consider how difficult it has been to find the responsible party for the anthrax attacks.

With our "perimeter" defenses weak, it's even more critical that Americans prepare for adequate civil defense. Civil defense is just that: defense prepared by citizens.

Recently I was out on the West Coast and had dinner with Nancy Greene. Nancy, the widow of the late actor Lorne Green, is president of The American Civil Defense Association (TACDA).

TACDA is a great organization that has raised alarm bells about the need for civil defense for decades.

Nancy, a smart lady who has a keen understanding of international affairs and national security, gave me a brief history of civil defense in America.

She said that real interest in civil defense first started with President Kennedy. After his first summit with Khrushchev in 1961, Kennedy was convinced the Russians were planning a nuclear attack on the U.S.

He returned from his summit in a funk and became a hermit for three days.

He then emerged from his silence with a plan. If America was going to survive, and millions of lives were to be saved, we would need a civil defense program.

But Kennedy decided the Pentagon should not be involved. Instead, Kennedy called upon a friend on Madison Avenue to launch an education effort on how citizens could protect themselves in case of such an attack.

The campaign worked, and was prescient as the nuclear tensions rose during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Since those days, America has let down its guard. We felt protected during the Cold War under an umbrella of nuclear-tipped missiles and a powerful military. Our enemy was definable.

But now, terrorists are not so easily definable and they are not so afraid of retaliation, as the Russians were.

Once again, government and the private sector need to go into partnership to educate citizens on how to create emergency disaster plans for their families.

Extra food and water is a foundation of any planning. But how many American families have more than a week's supply, if that, on hand?

It's also critical for citizens to have access to potassium iodide, necessary to prevent an agonizing death if radioactive iodine gets into the thyroid. But how many people know this? Why doesn't the government have a stockpile of potassium iodide?

Perhaps a start would be for us to to discard Hollywood myths.

A nuclear detonation does not mean the end of the world. The worst effects will likely not be caused by a nuclear blast, but rather by citizens unprepared and unknowledgeable about how to survive such a calamity.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Homeland/Civil Defense
Bioterrorism
War on Terrorism


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-145 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: MeeknMing
For some strange reason, our government is very reluctant to prepare its citizens for such a calamity, though acknowledging that such a calamity is not only possible, it's probable.

I'm all for preparation, but really, how probable is a nuclear bomb going off in NYC?

62 posted on 11/09/2001 6:19:28 AM PST by Nate505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamWeisshaupt
I'll take my chances!
63 posted on 11/09/2001 6:20:00 AM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jethro Tull
Why am I getting the sudden urge to watch Gregory Peck in "On the Beach"?
What's wrong with the picture link?

64 posted on 11/09/2001 6:25:57 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: MeeknMing
Well this NY FReeper is hoping that you are all wrong, BUT anyone got room for a family of four and two cats and a dog?? we arent messy, and we are well armed and whizzes at Jeopardy and scattergories!!
66 posted on 11/09/2001 6:26:42 AM PST by All-American Medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
Especially this time of the year, the cold is on it's way & the people up North will shiver & freeze if we didn't have any fuel. Down South we get cold but we won't freeze, let's hope these b@stards don't have a Nuke.
67 posted on 11/09/2001 6:38:59 AM PST by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
At one time that may have been the plan, but as much as I am suprised by it, I would have to say that Russia is being a good allie through this. (By the Way the USSR has been gone for a Decade) China on the other hand is a bunch of Sabre Rattling Back Stabbing opportunist that would love to step into World Power Status & yesterday tested their new Nuke Missile that is more than capable of hitting the U.S. all thanks to one Mr. Slick Willie.
68 posted on 11/09/2001 6:45:26 AM PST by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird; Peter W. Kessler
I have some powdered water. I just don't know what to add.
LOL!

By the way PK, I'd pitch the emergency provisions. After 40 years, it's probably good for rat poison???

69 posted on 11/09/2001 6:50:14 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Nate505
I'm all for preparation, but really, how probable is a nuclear bomb going off in NYC?
Probably as unlikely as a plane intentionally flying into the WTC Twin Towers???

I would have thought quite unlikely on September 10th.

I still remember my first reaction when Carol told me "a plane flew into the WTC in New York.":

"What? You're kidding? No, you're not! You wouldn't kid about something like that!"

Then when the second plane flew into the other tower:

"What's wrong with the world?"

70 posted on 11/09/2001 6:57:28 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: All-American Medic
Well this NY FReeper is hoping that you are all wrong, BUT anyone got room for a family of four and two cats and a dog?? we arent messy, and we are well armed and whizzes at Jeopardy and scattergories!!
Lots of room in Texas, "come on down" as Bob Barker says. Plenty of NY yankees already here too! ;-)

71 posted on 11/09/2001 7:02:39 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
I figured out what we need to do. We need to sell BL a nuke. Give them enought time to get it secreted in Afghanistan and then a timely 'accident' could occur.

Our hands would remain clean and it would act as a deterrent for any other idiot group that wanted to play dirty.

72 posted on 11/09/2001 7:05:49 AM PST by antidisestablishment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
And your scientific basis for this totally stupid remark is? I have been advised by experts on this site that is impossible for us to use a single nuke, in any form, neutron, tactical, etc. because we don't know who to target, can't prove in court beyond legal benefit of doubt that party targeted is actually guilty of the crime, if we use nuke we will cause holy war which will require us to nuke more and more targets which will cause fallout to poison China which will cause them to nuke us, and so on, and so on. As a result we and all babies will die. Haven't you been reading any of the threads ref. nuke use?? We have the same problem if we want to deport illegal aliens. Don't attack me, I still want to Nuke Em Till The Glow, and China can take a number. We are intending to reduce our stockpile anyway.
73 posted on 11/09/2001 7:09:13 AM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
#64:

74 posted on 11/09/2001 7:15:19 AM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jethro Tull
Why am I getting the sudden urge to watch Gregory Peck in "On the Beach"?
Great actor! Don't recall this movie tho. . .

75 posted on 11/09/2001 7:24:16 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
So, let's suppose a suitcase nuke is detonated in Manhattan Berkely.
76 posted on 11/09/2001 7:29:24 AM PST by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler
Don't forget to *****Duck and Cover*****

Very important ya know! ; )

77 posted on 11/09/2001 7:30:07 AM PST by horsewhispersc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
If I were one of the terrorists and I actually had a nuclear capability, I wouldn't detonate the thing in New York. For maximum disruptive effect, I'd take it to Washington, D.C. and set it off with absolutely no warning whatsoever. That would have a far more demoralizing effect on the American citizen than more destruction in New York. That would cause chaos, with a capital C.
78 posted on 11/09/2001 7:31:01 AM PST by CubicleGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
i think we have a manhattan project of our own that we could utilize in case of just such an emergency.
79 posted on 11/09/2001 7:37:54 AM PST by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The policy should be similar and premptive like the Monroe Doctrine and or MAD (Mutaully Assured Destruction). We should make it very clear that no matter who claims responsibilty, if any American city is nuked that within hours the following cities without hesitation will be eliminated as well starting with Bagdad, Damascus, Tehran, Beiruit, Kabul, Peshawar, Kartoom, and than if China makes any moves Peking and all their nuclear forces should be targeted.
80 posted on 11/09/2001 7:42:00 AM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson