Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If New York Is Nuked
NewsMax ^ | November 9, 2001 | Christopher Ruddy

Posted on 11/09/2001 2:18:51 AM PST by MeekOneGOP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

Comment #103 Removed by Moderator

To: Nate505
It would seem that the technical difficulties in hijacking planes are not as complex as the technical difficulties of smuggling nuclear weapons into the US and detonating them, at least to me...
I think you're right about that. For me, hijacking a plane would be something I couldn't do. Nukes neither! Even if I had the inclination and the nerve, I think Murphy's law wouuld work against me! LOL! (But I don't have either of those either!)

104 posted on 11/09/2001 12:15:14 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Ok, you're one less person we have to worry about :)
105 posted on 11/09/2001 12:43:42 PM PST by Nate505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa
The true power of militant Islam is not what they can do to us, but rather what they can deny to us.

Think about that next time you fill up your gas tank, turn on a light, or heat up your house.

Well said, I am disappointed that the administration has not made energy self sufficiency part of their agenda against terrorism.


I hope you're not UNDERestimatin' GWB now are ya? Don't count this option out! Remember, he campaigned on ANWR! ! ! You can bet, he hasn't forgotten! And IMHO, we have BADLY needed an Energy Policy for 30 years!

He's fightin' a WAR right now, so this is simply in the Queue waitin' for the right time to be put before the DIMocRATS who will quickly sign up to it. . .

106 posted on 11/09/2001 2:42:32 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Nate505; Sidebar Moderator
Comment #92 Removed by Moderator
Anybody see this post? Why was it removed?? Just curious. . .

107 posted on 11/09/2001 2:46:02 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MaeWest
I believe he is refering with sarcasm to the propaganda that was put out by the peace movement. In order to advance their political agenda they promoted despair and a false sense of helplessness ('In case of attack, we're all gonna die! Give up, give up now!'). Their goal was to terrify people into supporting them.
Excellent post there, good FReeper friend! ;-)

108 posted on 11/09/2001 2:54:27 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Also, thanks to Clinton, our civil defense shelters were shut down and the supplies sold off. Thanks Bill.
109 posted on 11/09/2001 3:06:58 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
And your scientific basis for this totally stupid remark is?

Not real tuned into sarcasm are you?

110 posted on 11/09/2001 3:10:37 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
"Not real tuned into sarcasm are you?"

I saw no hint of sarcasm. As a physicist, I take scientific comments seriously and that one showed gross ignorance, not sarcasm.

Sorry if I get a bit intense about something so trivial as the security of the country/world!

111 posted on 11/09/2001 3:31:04 PM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"Daddy, what's an Arab?"
112 posted on 11/09/2001 3:32:31 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
It was removed at the request of the person who posted it.
113 posted on 11/09/2001 3:41:53 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
bump
114 posted on 11/09/2001 4:40:36 PM PST by Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Anybody see this post? Why was it removed?? Just curious. . .

I asked them to remove it. It was just a double post, the exact same thing I posted in #91....double posts just get on my nevers personally, especially when I do them.

115 posted on 11/09/2001 5:37:20 PM PST by Nate505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Nate505
double posts just get on my nevers personally, especially when I do them.
Ah! Ok, thanks! I noticed another one:

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

I wonder what that was about?. . .

116 posted on 11/10/2001 12:01:09 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
They already did-- have you ever heard of immigration?
117 posted on 11/10/2001 12:11:18 AM PST by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
More abuse.
118 posted on 11/10/2001 12:12:19 AM PST by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Please explain. There is a cute little 17 year old cheerleader at our highschool. She is a foreign exchange student from Danmark. How did she get to be a threat worthy of deportation? She's here on a Visa, and is an alien, so according to your rant she is suspect, should have her visa revoked, and expelled to save our nation. --- ASA Vet

I didn't rant. I linked. One of the links is to a discussion based on the idea of "revoking all visas". I listed that link in my post because there are many posts and points-of-view in that discussion. I personally subscribe to the idea of a Terrorist Deportation Plan, which would send all visitors home if they are from certain suspect countries. Last I checked Denmark (correcting your spelling) is not harboring terrorists. And if it were, I doubt if they would be blond Danish people, but rather, swarthy middle-easterns visiting Denmark for travel and a bit of terrorism.

I believe strongly in profiling, not just at the airport security checks, but at the visa window and the INS line.

The action I'm supporting would be focused on specific groups, but failing that, if the USA can't get smart enough to focus on those groups, I would accept a blanket ban on all visas, as much as it would inconvenience innocent people like your friend. Again, that's not what I hope happens and is not what I would vote for. I want to keep visitors from suspect countries out and let everyone else retain normal travel status. But if the only choice was "no visas" or "visas for everyone", I would have to vote "no visas".

We are at war. This is much more serious than any war we've ever been in. If we lose this one, we're out of the ballgame.

119 posted on 11/10/2001 12:38:09 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mat_Helm
We should make it very clear that no matter who claims responsibilty, if any American city is nuked that within hours the following cities without hesitation will be eliminated as well starting with Bagdad, Damascus, Tehran, Beiruit, Kabul, Peshawar, Kartoom,

You forgot Mecca and Medina

120 posted on 11/10/2001 12:46:07 AM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson