Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Phoenix, We're Terrorists!
Sierra Times/KABA ^ | 14 Nov 01 | Self

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:04:30 PM PST by 11B3

Do you defend the Constitution? If the police pull you over, do you want to know why? Have you ever "hacked"? Are you alone? Well, guess what Freepers - if you can answer "Yes" to any of these questions (and a whole bunch more that fits nearly everyone), then you are a terrorist! Instead of continuing my rant, I'll show you the tri-fold pamphlet that this info comes from so that you can do your own ranting. Here it is:

Front Page

Back Page


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: billofrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-287 next last
To: maica
"Does this Act cover US citizens, or just foreign nationals rounded up on suspicion of terrorist culpability?"

It covers both

181 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:11 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Dane
"If this had been a Clinton flyer, there would be no reference to ELF or Black seperatists."

Yeah, kinda like Pakistan and all the other terrorist nations, which are now our "friends". At least they are friends of the US Government.

Only the government may murder, steal, and have terrorist friends. God forbide and the SUPREME rights of the INDIVIDUAL should be respected.

182 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:30 PM PST by JRadcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Please read the posts above...I've already verified with the FBI that its official

Call the Phoenix FBI at 602/279-5511 and ask them yourself.

Ask for the Duty Officer!

183 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:31 PM PST by Verax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: JRadcliffe
Get this through your head (of unknown thickness): the word "defenders" was in quotes in this pamphlet. There are some folks out there who loudly--and falsely--claim to be "defenders" of the Constitution.

Differentiating between someone who is a defender of the Constitution and someone who is a "defender" of the Constitution requires judgement and discrimination--just like reading this pamphlet does.

184 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:32 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: JRadcliffe
Oh man....that's scary!!
185 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:32 PM PST by Verax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

Comment #186 Removed by Moderator

To: Verax
I'm one of them doomsday cult types. I believe,...no I know we are all going to die,......someday.
187 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:32 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
I've seen a few texts like that. Keep in mind, it's not all bad out there. I have the Constitution up in my classroom, and use it in class discussion at least monthly... and I'm a math teacher.

Click here to see what my school does for Veteran's Day, as well! =^)

188 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:33 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Righty1

Congressional Oath of Office

I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.
189 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:33 PM PST by Verax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"Differentiating between someone who is a defender of the Constitution and someone who is a "defender" of the Constitution requires judgement and discrimination--just like reading this pamphlet does."

You may feel comfortable allowing government to use good judgement and descrimination -- I DO NOT!

190 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:33 PM PST by JRadcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: DaiHuy
Didn't notice Black Muslims either.

What terrorist activities have they engaged in? Also, they are (or some of them are) black separatists.

191 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:33 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: JRadcliffe
So you can't speak better English? You're funny. You speak in circles and then laugh at people who don't understand your tripe.
192 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:33 PM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
--and falsely--claim to be "defenders" of the Constitution.

Think about what you're writing.

Claiming either falsely or truthfully to be a defender of the Constitution is IN NO WAY A TERRORIST ACT.

There's no damn good reason for "defender of the Constitution" to be on this brochure at all!

as an act which represents suspicion of domestic terrorism.

Who's going to decide who is claiming TRUTHFULLY or FALSELY?

193 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:34 PM PST by Verax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: JRadcliffe
bump!
194 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:34 PM PST by Verax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: wwjdn
"So you can't speak better English? You're funny. You speak in circles and then laugh at people who don't understand your tripe."

Oh really? So far, you're the ONLY one who has EVER said so. That should tell you something deary.

195 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:34 PM PST by JRadcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Verax
Thank you, you've just made my point about discrimination and judgement, good day.
196 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:35 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: JRadcliffe
Even the most legitimate functions of government require the application of good judgement and discrimination. But you don't want ANYONE to apply any of those. I'm sorry, but I'm not into anarchy.
197 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:35 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: JRadcliffe
And your point is?????
198 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:45 PM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Righty1
word is getting out...
199 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:47 PM PST by Verax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"I'm sorry, but I'm not into anarchy."

Neither am I. I am into a Constitutional Republic -- which we do not have. If we did, the FBI wouldn't even exist. The feds have absolutely no Constitutional authority for a federalized police force, a.k.a. FBI

200 posted on 11/16/2001 1:08:48 PM PST by JRadcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-287 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson