Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA unleashes new threat to human babies
American Life League, Inc. ^ | Release issued 21 Nov 01

Posted on 11/22/2001 10:59:38 PM PST by toenail

FDA unleashes new threat to human babies

"In the midst of a terror campaign and a frightening battle against anthrax, the FDA has somehow been able to find the time to sanction yet another form of baby killing," said Judie Brown, president of American Life League. "The newly-approved birth control patch uses the same abortion-causing chemicals used in many other so-called contraceptives."

With its approval of the birth control patch, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has now approved its fourth new "contraceptive" option in the last year. The skin patch has been added to a collection that already includes a monthly injection, a hormone-emitting IUD, and a hormone-emitting contraceptive ring.

"All these devices deliver the same hormones to the woman's body and all work in the same manner," said Mrs. Brown. "They all affect the uterine lining and prevent implantation of a newly-conceived human being, thus causing the end of that human being's life."

"The FDA should be ashamed of itself," said Mrs. Brown. "All Americans should reject this new form of baby killing and seek to protect all innocent human life, from fertilization to natural death."

Release issued: 21 Nov 01

©2001 American Life League, Inc.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-407 next last
To: pcl
Morals are an individual thing..

You must have loved Bubba then...

81 posted on 11/23/2001 11:52:32 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pcl
To Khepera, pcl writes:

Have you ever made a post that was not an attack or a bump..

My question to you...even though it is becoming apparent you don't answer questions...

Have you ever made a post that didn't forward a leftist agenda?

82 posted on 11/23/2001 11:56:44 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pcl
When I see the majority of the anti-abortionist crowd treating their two week old miscarried fetuses like humans then maybe I will start to believe that you actually believe what you preach.</I.

To be consistent, every sexually active pro-life female must subject all of her used menstrual pads, tampons, etal to microscopic examination to determine if an aborted fetus is present. Otherwise she risks committing the sin of condemning her baby to the trash heap without benefit of baptism.

83 posted on 11/24/2001 12:00:16 AM PST by athiestwithagun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pcl
Why can't you people just live your own unhappy lives.

Projecting a bit, aren't you?

Christian pro-life people are the happiest people on earth.

Why must you insist that everyone else carry your burdens of guilt and unhappiness?

Christians have learned that they can't bear their own burden of guilt and unhappiness, and have cast that burden on the Lord. Because of that fact, Christians are also the most guilt-free people on earth.

You should try it sometime.

84 posted on 11/24/2001 12:04:27 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: athiestwithagun
To be consistent, every sexually active pro-life female must subject all of her used menstrual pads, tampons, etal to microscopic examination to determine if an aborted fetus is present. Otherwise she risks committing the sin of condemning her baby to the trash heap without benefit of baptism.

Good point. However, consistentency is not a big trait among the anti-free choice crowd.

They would be happiest of if females where sown shut at birth and not opened until married.

85 posted on 11/24/2001 12:24:47 AM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: pcl
I asked: "If they did have a funeral and a burial, would you then be convinced that the 2 week old fetus is a human person deserving protection? "

Your answered: "No. But I would believe that YOU believed what you are preaching.

So what is the point of using the argument that since pro-lifers don't bury all their miscarriages, the fetus must not be a human being? How we treat others does not determine their humanity (it determines ours). If pro-lifers acted in the way you would want them to, you still would be pro-abortion. Apparently your objection to our behavior has nothing to do with whether or not the fetus is a human being "in your mind."

Believe it or not, we are trying to get at truth here. Either the unborn are human beings, deserving protection, or they are not. If they are not, then you are right and abortion is nothing more than "tumor" removal and is nobody's business. But if they are, then it is the taking of another human beings life....and it becomes everyone's business in society to protect the defenseless.

The point of this whole debate is: what is the unborn? It has nothing to do with "choice". Artist's Husband

86 posted on 11/24/2001 4:29:43 AM PST by Artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: pcl
I have observed that you anti-abortionists do not treat a two week old miscarriage like a person. You flush them down the toilet. If you truely belived the two week old fetus to be a person, you would treat it like a person.

END OF STORY

Not end of story by a longshot.

Women - of all types - prochoice, prolife - just women who have miscarriages - GRIEVE over their lost BABIES no matter what stage in pregnancy they lose their BABIES.

(FETUS is LATIN for "CHILD").

No, they don't hold memorial services for these babies. (Though some may). But that does not mean these tiny children are not grieved over as any child lost would be!

You speak of not wanting others to impose their will on a woman (i.e. - not allowing her to have an abortion if she so chooses).

Yet - you and the "proabortion" crowd members all conveniently ignore the fact that by ending the life of an unborn child (fetus means child), you are imposing your will on that child who has no voice. These unborn children are male and FEMALE. Therefore, you are forcing YOUR WILL on other females! (forcing them not to have the chance to be born and live and grow).

There is grace and love, oceans of love, mercy, and forgiveness for women who have "chosen" abortions - or who have had miscarraiges. (Many women who have miscarraigs experience guilt - as causing the DEATH of their baby somehow).

I don't know how old you are. I don't know what has happened to you regarding children or births. I don't know if you are a woman or a man. But I do know this. Your heart is hardened towards God - and towards human beings - for some reason. Only hard hearted people can be blind to the death of unborn children being a cause for mourning and great sorrow.....no matter how it happens.

I am old enough to remember my High School Biology text which was published before Roe V. Wade. That book - and all the Biology books of that pre-RVW era - clearly taught that "life begins at conception." The life of a new human being begins at conception. I don't know what the books of today teach - but there was no doubt about that fact then. (an aside: Yes, this is the "law". But so were the laws of Nazi Germany which viewed Jews as nonpersons. America's law has put unborn children in the category of nonpersons. But that is man's law - which does not ALWAYS represent the TRUTH about reality, now does it? Think of Nazi Germany - do some research - their laws were WRONG. Roe V. Wade is wrong also. One day, like Nazi German learned, we will realize our terrible error as a nation and come to our knees in repentance, pleading with God for forgiveness of us as individuals and as people).

Your callous disregard about a woman who "chooses" to force HER WILL on a defenseless unborn CHILD - all the while claiming to detest others who want to force their will on you - simply does not fly.

I do not judge you, however. Any woman in a crisis pregnancy - needs FACTS. Pro-abortionists never want truth/facts given to women in a crisis pregnancy because when a woman knows she is about to end the life of a BABY - a CHILD (fetus=child), they will often choose to either postpone the abortion or they will refuse it altogether! (taking money out of the hands of the abortionist - not nice)

One day, I do pray that you will turn to the God who loves you, and loves each and every child coming into this world, so much He sent his Son to live, suffer, and die on a cross - in your place - that you might have LIFE - eternal life - with God. Many who have held views you hold have done so - and have discovered the fantastic joy and peace of a relationship with the One True God, through His Son, Jesus Christ - the One person in all history who did more than any other to raise the condition and value of women in the world!

87 posted on 11/24/2001 5:04:29 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: pcl
pcl,

In all sincerety, you seem to be very concerned about the suffering of women who have unwanted pregrancies. But you totally miss the point that it is wrong for them to kill their unborn children.

You claim that they are only "potential" human beings before 3 to 6 months. But you offer no argument for what changes them from potential to actual human beings... it is just an arbitrary decision you have made with no biological or ethical foundation. In other words, its just your opinion.

You have been offered several ethical arguments and biological facts from pro-lifers here as to why a fetus (at any stage) is in fact a human being and should not be killed. You haven't refuted any of them... just restated your opinion that you disagree with those facts and reasons. You offer nothing in response to pro-life arguments and biological facts, except your opinion.

If you expect to change anyone's mind, you need to tell us why the fetus before 3 months is not a human being and why pro-lifers have no "right" to argue for the protection of the unborn.

Husband of Artist

88 posted on 11/24/2001 5:05:12 AM PST by Artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
I missed your point, I treasure life from inception to natural death. I also believe strongly in morals.
89 posted on 11/24/2001 5:48:40 AM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pcl
Hmmm...are you not attempting to force your beliefs on her though? In an open forum we can freely discuss and disagree. I wouldn't call that forcing beliefs on anyone. We as individuals live our beliefs. All of us.
90 posted on 11/24/2001 8:37:41 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
bump
91 posted on 11/24/2001 8:39:58 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: wwjdn
Sorry for the confusion, wwjdn. I was responding to pcl's response to you and wanted to include you in my response. How's that for confusing?! Her response was in asteriks.

I know where your heart is. <><

92 posted on 11/24/2001 8:42:08 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: toenail
Contraception is surely self defeating when at the same time one promotes 'democracy' ... he who has the numbers rules.
93 posted on 11/24/2001 8:44:42 AM PST by gjenkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

Comment #95 Removed by Moderator

To: NAMMARINE
Maybe you should read the whole thread before guessing about who pcl is.
96 posted on 11/24/2001 9:03:06 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Republic
It is about selfish, irresponsible women and men who look for convenience and kill to maintain the same.

In all human enterprise, people kill other people for convenience, and claim just purpose, or present the "unavoidable" excuse, or just turn a blind eye to another's fatal circumstance. We generally do not talk candidly about the whole realm of who gets to live and fulfill their potential and who gets to die for want of sufficient nurture from fellow humans.

It seems bogus to me for one to focus on this area of human activity to draw a line. How about the overt acts of war we humans regularly justify? How about the routine denial of our surplus substance to hundreds of millions around the world, while watching them starve to death? How about the squalor that some children is this very country suffer?

Unless pro-lifer's live like Mother Teresa, I believe their agenda is more of a control issue. And I am anti-abortion! But it is quite clear to me that many will die in furtherance of my convenience.

97 posted on 11/24/2001 9:27:27 AM PST by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul
Anyone who seeks to control the potential long life of a victem without a voice is ok by me. If you don't want to be the voice for the tiny infant who does not have one, then I will be that voice in your stead. You can go ahead and be the mommy's voice, someone who DOES already have one, and make like abortion is only about her body rights. Balderdash. A life-a LIFE AND DEATH situation exists for the child. Ya have to wonder, how important is this convenient trashing of babies to the parent? I mean, would abortion be popular as a means of birth control IF having an abortion included a 50/50 life and death proposition for mommy? I think not. How CONVENIENT to shut the unspoken voice of the growing infant out.

There will always be death, murder and mayhem. There will be wars, acts of terror and hunger and death from disease and mutilation by rabid dictators. But there does NOT have to be the crushing of life, the ripping of a growing infant from the womb. To compare the denial of a long life to a newly growing infant to war and pestilance and hunger and murder is ridiculous. All it takes to kill an infant is a sick woman, a equally sick partner in some instances and a very sick doctor. Oh, a great big bunch of denial and lack of conscience.

98 posted on 11/24/2001 10:21:31 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Re:#30 The italics are what I posted to answer Free the USA's questions. Your comment should be directed to him. Look again, please! (I've inverted the italics, non-italics)
99 posted on 11/24/2001 10:56:04 AM PST by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
Thanks, I confuse easily...lol
100 posted on 11/24/2001 11:11:50 AM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 401-407 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson