Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper Help Requested - Pasteurization Units, Calculating
Moi | Jhoffa_X

Posted on 11/25/2001 8:38:06 AM PST by Jhoffa_

I have a question regarding pasteurization that no one has (thus far) been able to answer.

In a production environment, pasteurization units (Pu's) are the standard for determining pasteurization effectiveness. A pasteurization unit is equal to one minute @60° C. Depending of which bacteria you wish to kill each product is pasteurized to a specified number of PU's. The total number of Pu's are a product of both Time and Temperature.

My question is: How is the total number of PU's calculated over a production run where the times and temperatures vary?

What is the formula for accurately determining total Pu's when you have the time/temperature available?

I had thought that it was a simple matter of raising the Lethal Rate to the power of (Tempurature-base)

Example: Pu's per minute = Lt ^ (Temp - 60)

So if the Lt were, say 1.235 And the Temp were 62° You would be pulling down 1.52 Pu's per minute.

But I now have a Chart from a major manufacturer of Pasteurization Equipment and while this formula is dead accurate in the middle of the chart, error creeps in as you near the high and low temperature extremes.

So, what is the formula for calculating these Pu's accurately, regardless of temperature?

ANY HELP you can provide will be greatly appeaciated.

Thank You.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Jhoffa_

Uh?


21 posted on 11/25/2001 11:40:44 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
You want to know what the really amazing part of this question is?

I personally know an ex-quality manager who has no idea what the answer is.. and the Present Quality Manager has no idea either (she makes seventy grand BTW)

A large majority of their products are pasteurized and they refer to the chart to determine if the product has been pasteurized properly.

Aside from that, production would cease.. because no one can accurately calculate these PU's.

No one can calculate this themselves without the Pu chart. And it's a huge company making millions a year.

I would be willing to bet you have consumed one of their products at some point..

22 posted on 11/25/2001 12:15:40 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
I don't have any figures. It's going to depend upon the organism ahd would need to be deterimed experimentally.
23 posted on 11/25/2001 1:56:28 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Thanks for your reply RLK.

Correct, you are targeting specific organisms..

And there is a "D" value which effectively gives you a list of organisms which die after a certain time/temperature

The Lethal Rate, is calculated from this "D" value.

Assuming the Lethal Rate to be fixed. (pick a number, 1.393 works.. very close to that of beer)

How can I calculate this?

Honestly, No one can answer this.. If you need more information I will do my very best to provide it.

24 posted on 11/25/2001 2:10:12 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Ps: Does the formula in #2 mean anything to you.?

The variables are: Time, Temperature, Lethal rate (use 1.393) And the sum (sigma) of total Pu's accumulated over a given period.. (delta, a change in)

25 posted on 11/25/2001 2:16:42 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Where LT is the lethal rate, or the ratio of time (in minutes) at 60ºC resulting in the same bacteria inactivation as 1 minute at T ºC, and D tT are the time intervals.
26 posted on 11/25/2001 2:27:42 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
The formula is a summation operator, but I don't know what the vales are to be cummulatively added.
27 posted on 11/25/2001 4:08:31 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Georgia_JimD
Didn't find anything useful there.. (except a really great gif of a HTST pasteurizer)

And, don't sweat the paper.. Lot's of guy's look sexy with no eyebrows.. Honest!

(Have I ever lied to you?)

28 posted on 11/25/2001 5:53:03 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Sorry, I haven't the foggiest. I do home canning (or used to do it, before I got so sick) and the hope in that always is to kill EVERYTHING....
29 posted on 11/26/2001 12:15:19 AM PST by ChemistCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Can you help me with the calculation part of the problem?

My microbiology work on milk products goes back to the late 1950's. Can't remember a lot of specifics. I do remember that there were a couple of different ways of pasteurizing. One [the 'flash' method] involved bringing the product up to a high temperature for a very short period [perhaps a minute]; the other involved holding the product at a somewhat lower temperature for a lengthier period of time.

As I recall a critical point was the cream line . If you got milk held too long long at too high a temperature the cream turned an interesting color and was aesthetically unappealing.

30 posted on 11/26/2001 9:36:43 AM PST by curmudgeonII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Can you help me with the calculation part of the problem?

My microbiology work on milk products goes back to the late 1950's. Can't remember a lot of specifics. I do remember that there were a couple of different ways of pasteurizing. One [the 'flash' method] involved bringing the product up to a high temperature for a very short period [perhaps a minute]; the other involved holding the product at a somewhat lower temperature for a lengthier period of time.

As I recall a critical point was the cream line . If you got milk held too long long at too high a temperature the cream turned an interesting color and was aesthetically unappealing.

31 posted on 11/26/2001 9:37:05 AM PST by curmudgeonII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
BUMP!
32 posted on 11/27/2001 3:07:57 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson