Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Moron alert.

E. Pluribus Unum member since November 22nd, 1998

You know, you people really annoy the s*** out of my who immediately label as a TROLL any relative newbie who didn't join way back in 1998, and who shows ANY evidence whatsoever of being an independent thinker rather than just a "YEAH, BABY, ME TOO!" dittohead who just automatically SECONDS every single damn thing that is said in this forum.

I may have only officially joined this forum post-911, but if you BOTHERED to actually READ any of the posts and other meaningful information I've contributed, you would know that not only am I not a troll, I've contributed a HELL of a lot more to this forum lately than you have.

41 posted on 11/26/2001 10:35:04 AM PST by butter pecan fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: butter pecan fan
Pardon the rant, folks, it's just that this place isn't always very welcoming to those of us who didn't join in 1998.
44 posted on 11/26/2001 10:36:57 AM PST by butter pecan fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: butter pecan fan
Hysteria just proves you're a troll.
48 posted on 11/26/2001 10:43:19 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: butter pecan fan
Admit it. Your former identity was Eschoir, wasn't it?
49 posted on 11/26/2001 10:44:07 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: butter pecan fan
I'm with you on that one. I always thought 2 weeks was the "distruptor" period (ie, anybody that stuck it out for 2 weeks isn't here to disrupt but to discuss). And, any skimming of your posts in the threads shows you're in for info, not grinding an axe. EPU can be kind of a toad sometimes.
51 posted on 11/26/2001 10:45:11 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: butter pecan fan
...and who shows ANY evidence whatsoever of being an independent thinker rather than just a...

If you had any independent thinking skills you would realize those statistics are misleading, if not entirely fabricated.

In 1994, every day, 16 children age 19 and under were killed with gun...

Simple arithmetic leads to a number of 5,840 children and young adults were slain by firearms. There are several problems with this statistic. One, this is much more than the figure reported by the US DOJ and the UN WHO. Two, this figure does not distinguish accential death from deliberate homicide. Three, it does not distinguish between children and adults. Anyone over the age of 18 is legally an adult, and including them into a figure for the deaths of children is inaccurate.

If you actually were an independent thinker, you would realize you are being fed a line. If you separate 17 - 19 year olds from your figure, the number of firearm related fatalities drops more than order of magniture. Clearly, something different is going on with this other age bracket.

61 posted on 11/26/2001 11:42:59 AM PST by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson