WITNESS TO A LYNCH MOB - Communist Editor Matthew Rothschild Has a Fit!

The Progressive ^ | October 19, 2001 | By Matthew Rothschild

[Howlin]

Life IS good, isn't it? :-)

[Howlin]

Aint it funny how the purveyors of pure democracy suddenly call it "MOB RULE" when it works against their plans?

Remember during the recount when they called the GOP protesters a MOB, as opposed to the AFL-CIO "protesters?" What fakes.

[Uncle Bill]

"Progressive" is a nonsense word when used politically."

Yes. But words have meaning. Progressive politically means nothing more than communist. It's just another phrase in a long list of phrases/terms that camouflage the true identity of the ideology. Environmentalist is another one. Their elite leadership are nothing more than fellow travelers. Politically, I have always stated the same for the word liberals. I don't believe I have ever used the word liberal in my comments here at FR, as I believe they support all the planks that are also nothing more than communist/socialist/fascist ideology. If I ever did use the word liberal, it was a mistake on my part. I do this quite often on the radio, and it really sets them off. They cannot stand to look in the mirror, that is if they give one enough time to explain in detail what I'm talking about. Do I believe in progress? You bet. But Progressive politically, to me, means nothing more than the regression to the leftist Marxist pit of slavery, death and hell. They're like the phony religions that have to keep changing their name and books of religious teachings because their current crop of prophesies are no longer valid in the current times that we live. Americans, for the most part have adopted the Communist Manifesto and more, so I don't see them charging down the street to run the Communists out of the government school system and Institutions of lower learning. We are progressing however. To totalitarianism. Perhaps they'll hug us before they kill us.

[Uncle Bill]

"Life IS good, isn't it? :-)"

I can't think of anything more enjoyable than watching a leftist whine in such an annoying fashion. Well, maybe a couple things. 8-)

[Uncle Bill]

I wanted to say, it could be much worse.

[Uncle Bill]

You're welcome. God bless. I can't think of anything the left believes in that has any redeemable qualities, and nothing they believe in personifies the founding documents, the founding fathers, the Constitution, or anything else within the bedrock and pillars of the Republic. They even agree with me. The word I guess is slow to spread. I guess it just took old Bob some time to figure it out.

Fascism, corruption and my 'Democratic' Party

[Uncle Bill]

BTTT

[dasboot]

Love the Pledge, except for that indivisable thing. I think I should be able to divorce my wife if she keeps beatin' me up. A republic should be a voluntary association, shouldn't it? Otherwise it's just a shotgun marriage.

Or does that line just reflect the hope of comity that would endear one State to its neighbors?

[dasboot]

And while I'm thinkin' about it:

The original Oaths of Office upon which the Pledge is modeled were the promises, before God and before the People by whom they were elected, of officials to discharge their offices with due diligence. In that light, shouldn't it be the "flag" that pledges to to People?

Or maybe the People should pledge allegiance to their fellow citizens. Does the flag represent the People or the governmental construct they created?

I'm not being maliciously provocative, I sincerely want to know some other's thoughts on this matter.

[Uncle Bill]

It doesn't matter anymore. It was destroyed some time ago. It's pretend now. No shots were fired. It's just a matter of herding sheep into outside slaughter pens now. Then the government crop-dusters come.

I know, I know, sounds crazy. Give poor Uncle Bill some medication.

The Chief Executive Officer of The United States (our Commander in Chief) will not only make this law, but will also judge, under the cloak of secrecy, what constitutes classified information. As H.R. 4210 section 611f, repeals security clearances and oaths, classified information may concern an action unfaithful to the Constitution that he has previously sworn to uphold. In our rush to find relief from a fomented fear of apocalyptic terror, will we trample into the dust every document guaranteeing our liberties? [15]

The same blessing is not extended to the states who rightfully deserve to determine the outcome of their fates. Instead, Congress repeals the rights of states to use funds to prepare for 'hazards' (sec. 5. DEFINITIONS, "hazard" means an emergency or disaster resulting from a natural, accidental or man caused event - "including a domestic terrorist attack involving a weapon of mass destruction.")

Well, back to Communists, a.k.a "Progressives.

[dasboot]

Hey Uncle, Just because they can doesn't mean they will.

Chin up, man!

There's a way to go, and things change. Our country is not what it was; but the idea lives on.

I've read the material you post here before. Good to know, but it can get you down. How lucky we are to be alive in any circumstances! Rest easy. And may optomism light upon you.

I stand defiant before them who would slaughter me. I will look my executioner in the eye as I curl my hands around his neck. If I am to die, I do so in the manner of my choosing: Not with a pathetic bleating, but with a roar like a lion. Do you stand with me, brother?

[Uncle Bill]

"Do you stand with me, brother?"

Absolutely. To the very end.

[Inspector Harry Callahan]

Bump.

[Red Jones]

that was very nice of matthew rothschild to give us an eye-witness freeper report.

[Uncle Bill]

BTTT

[Uncle Bill]

BTTT

[Drawsing]

Some interesting history on the Pledge of Allegiance. Apparently it was written by a liberal socialist in an attempt to instill a sense of nationalism over statism. Take a look here.

[dasboot]

Thanks! That's what I figured.

[quebecois]

The thing that I find most amusing about lefties is their hypocritical reaction to conservatives sticking up for themselves. This clown probably has no problem with some PC group engaging in protests or boycotts. He probably supports environmentalits tearing down fences at nuclear power plants or some disgruntled minority group having a sit-in at the dean's office. But when conservatives come out and express their opinion...its a "lynch mob".

This reminds me of the protest that broke out in Florida during the last presidential election. One of the counties attempted to take the ballots behind closed doors and count them there....which resulted in the republicans in the building having a sit-in and chanting slogans. Some goofy liberal at the time saw this and said "there is a whiff of facism in the air". As if no lefties ever had a sit-in.