Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enron's Swoon Imperils Grand Experiment
Wall Street Journal ^ | November 30, 2001 | Rebecca Smith, WSJ Staff

Posted on 11/30/2001 2:10:53 AM PST by snopercod

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:45:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

It was one of the great fantasies of American business: a deregulated market that would send cheaper and more reliable supplies of electricity coursing into homes and offices across the nation.

But look what's happened instead. Enron Corp., the vast energy trader at the center of the new freewheeling U.S. power markets, now faces collapse amid a blizzard of questionable financial deals. And California, the first big state to deregulate its electricity market, has watched its experiment turn into a disaster, with intermittent blackouts and retail power rates as much as 40% higher than they were a year ago.


(Excerpt) Read more at interactive.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: calpowercrisis; calpowergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Tuco-bad
If the SEC let Lazio get away with insider trading, why should the SEC care about Enron?

Wait, you said regulation was good. If Lazio and Enron can get away with insider trading, what use is regulation?

41 posted on 11/30/2001 10:48:12 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
If the SEC let Lazio get away with insider trading, why should the SEC care about Enron?

Wait, you said regulation was good. If Lazio and Enron can get away with insider trading, what use is regulation?

42 posted on 11/30/2001 10:50:57 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
It's important to note that Enron isn't in trouble for what it did as an energy company, it's not even in trouble for not being profitable. They're in trouble for cooking the books. I'm not sure if it's in this WSJ article but it is in one I read this morning, their auditors were recommending adjustments to their profit and loss statement that were 50% of the net profits (as figured before the auditors showed up), Enron decided that those changes were not material (that's an accounting term but there are no real accountants out there that will tell you that 50% of something is not material). Now they've been caught, so the stock price is gonig through the floor, they're going to be fined up one side and down the other. But when the smoke clears they're still going to be a profitable energy company, just not as profitable as they've been saying they are.
43 posted on 11/30/2001 10:51:17 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
If Lazio and Enron can get away with insider trading, what use is regulation?

Good point, federal agencies (i.e., SEC) should do their jobs, or disband.

44 posted on 11/30/2001 11:06:08 AM PST by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: lepton
Indeed, funny how that works. Higher prices brought more supply... gosh.
45 posted on 11/30/2001 11:06:19 AM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: discostu; CT; cdwright; Dog Gone; unixfox; StriperSniper
FYI bump.
46 posted on 11/30/2001 11:07:33 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: discostu
But when the smoke clears they're still going to be a profitable energy company, just not as profitable as they've been saying they are

If your rignt at 29 cents a share, one could make a lot of money (think Penn Central).

BTW - I just put my mouth where my mouth is; bought 1 share of Enron.

47 posted on 11/30/2001 11:09:13 AM PST by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Oh my god! Laz invoked the dreaded Tuco-Bad tag!
48 posted on 11/30/2001 11:22:14 AM PST by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
Good point, federal agencies (i.e., SEC) should do their jobs, or disband.

Indeed. But that is the crux of the problem. If we could just legislate nirvana, we would be there.

Politicians and bureaucrats are cheap. The end result of populism always benefits the wealthy and powerful.

49 posted on 11/30/2001 11:37:33 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
"Are you still in business, I hear that companies out outsourcing much of their IT budgets to India, and engineering budgets (e.g., Boeing) to Russia."

Yup, I'm still in business and still expanding. Boeing is building their rocket engines here in Alabama, not Russia. Honda has just started making the Odessy minivan here, and Mercedes is greatly expanding their Alabama manufacturing plant. Southern Company is ramping up here in order to pick up the slack from ENRON's exit, and BellSouth is doing rather well. Placements at IBM have stopped, but requests from CSC are up once again (healthcare is booming around these parts). I've been getting a fair amount of bank business, too. AmSouth, SouthTrust, and Colonial Bank are benefiting from the current interest-rate environment.

Life is good.

50 posted on 11/30/2001 12:33:36 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Yup, I'm still in business and still expanding. Boeing is building their rocket engines here in Alabama, not Russia. Honda has just started making the Odessy minivan here, and Mercedes is greatly expanding their Alabama manufacturing plant. Southern Company is ramping up here in order to pick up the slack from ENRON's exit, and BellSouth is doing rather well. Placements at IBM have stopped, but requests from CSC are up once again (healthcare is booming around these parts). I've been getting a fair amount of bank business, too. AmSouth, SouthTrust, and Colonial Bank are benefiting from the current interest-rate environment.

Good for you! Sounds like you're entering the big time.

Regards.

51 posted on 11/30/2001 1:09:52 PM PST by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lepton; All
Kind of odd to apply the energy de-regulation argument to fraudulant financial book-keeping, just because a company that did so was in the energy business.

Excellent point. My first impression when reading this article was that the "spin" would be that the "energy pirates" were finally going to share a cell with "Spike".

My apologies to everyone. I posted the thread just as I had to leave for work, and just now got home.

52 posted on 11/30/2001 2:16:20 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Excellent post.

CNBC has been busy all day discussing Enron's swoon and
what it means and will it really happen (seems certain).

And what role Arthur Anderssen had in the cooking of the books, etc!

53 posted on 11/30/2001 3:32:22 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
There are uninformed, yet highly opinionated, folks who think that Enron's demise had something to do with California's power problems.

They couldn't be more wrong, and this should be a flag to others that their opinions are mere wishful thinking.

54 posted on 11/30/2001 3:36:20 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
I'm not disagreeing, but the true purpose of the "security" bill is to ensure that American citizens provide the security, not a foreigner (80% foreigners at Dulles Airport), who might harbor anti-American feelings.

Wrong. The true purpose of the "security bill" was to 1) satisfy the sheeple that the politicians "feel their pain" so the sheeple will have a sense of security (even though it's a false sense) and, 2) place 28,000 more people on government payrolls who will automatically have union dues confiscated from the paychecks to support support political views 40% of them do not share.

The security bill had little or nothing to do with foreigners acting as security guards--in fact, the security personnel did their jobs on 9/11. The screening rules that were in place then--enforced by the FAA were followed to a "T". Name for me one security guideline that was transgressed on 9/11 or one employee who has been reprimanded or fired as a result of the 9/11 incidents.

The "security" bill was a major scam and we all fell for it.

I wish someone would answer what we do when (and there will be a when) someone intent on evil gets through the federal screeners. What's the next step--federalizing the airlines?

55 posted on 11/30/2001 4:36:33 PM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Virginia-based AES Corp., which has missed its recent earnings targets, has scaled back its expansion goals and is selling some of its foreign assets.

IMO AES is the next house of cards to go.

Deregulation?

We have CAA I and II..............
Title V...........................
MACT..............................
TRI's.............................

There's nothing deregulated about "deregulation".

The primary result of the last ten years' "deregulation" has been that the mandated transfers of generating assets have lined the pockets of those on the receiving ends of the required legal costs and commissions.

As for Enron, pimps in the energy business are as old as the energy business. Enron just took it to the next level, and along the way generated enough money to grease politicians of both stripes.

56 posted on 11/30/2001 5:42:47 PM PST by Hamiltonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
I wish someone would answer what we do when (and there will be a when) someone intent on evil gets through the federal screeners. What's the next step--federalizing the airlines?

If there is a solution, that might be the only solution.

The hole in the current security plan is the maintenance workers on the airplanes, of which many are non-citizens.

I guess I am the the only one in the world who thinks that's a problem.

57 posted on 11/30/2001 7:19:43 PM PST by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
The hole in the current security plan is the maintenance workers on the airplanes, of which many are non-citizens.

I guess I am the the only one in the world who thinks that's a problem.

If you want to invent problems, you are free to do so. I am not aware of any case of sabotage on a commercial airliner perpetrated by maintenance workers. Doesn't mean it couldn't or wouldn't happen, but thus far, it has not.

I personally do not feel more secure with the federal government being in charge of this--or anything for that matter (except the military). Just look at the track records of the large government agencies like the IRS, the SSA, HHS--the agencies are a mess, the employees are often incompetent and/or surly (if you can actually ever get one to talk to you) and huge amounts of money are wasted or go unaccounted for.

Look at AMTRAK and you'll see how well the federal government handles transportation.

People are so easily duped into thinking their lives will be safer and better if the government runs them. In the case of the duped, perception = reality.

58 posted on 12/01/2001 5:19:07 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: randita
If you want to invent problems, you are free to do so. I am not aware of any case of sabotage on a commercial airliner perpetrated by maintenance workers. Doesn't mean it couldn't or wouldn't happen, but thus far, it has not.

Sure! Let's close the barn doors after the animals have escaped the barn.

59 posted on 12/01/2001 5:57:39 AM PST by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson