Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug Legalization - Expensive and Deadly Lie
Washington Witness ^ | by Eric Lobsinger

Posted on 12/03/2001 11:53:17 PM PST by FF578

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 521-530 next last
To: FF578
This is the most amateur and sloppy piece of "journalism" I've ever seen. This guy consistently substitutes his own opinion for hard facts. This is laughable. This is no more an authoritative article than some of the rambling prohibitionist rants from pseudo-tyrants in our government (or here on FR for that matter).

The author states that drugs cannot be lumped together with tobacco and alcohol, but does exactly that himself (twice in fact) in the paragraph just preceeding. I'm sure he realizes that taken separately, the dangers and consequences of drugs are miniscule in comparison to alcohol, therefore it's necessary to lump them together in order to talk about the collective danger of mind-altering substances. His contention that drugs (especially marijuana) is more dangerous than alcohol is obviously wrong (and laughable) even to the most gullible and un-critical thinker.

His examples of Amsterdam, the Netherlands and Switzerland take a very selective view of the problem. It also refers to the early stages of those countries' decriminalization programs, where the best approach was yet to be played out (but nonetheless worthwhile). I've been to both countries and seen them firsthand. I doubt the author has. Of course there's going to be a certain amount of transitional problems, but that doesn't make decriminalization a failure or without merit.

This is so poorly written and researched (if it was researched at all!) that I can't believe someone would actually publish it. This student newspaper has just injured its credibility significantly.

21 posted on 12/04/2001 4:37:03 AM PST by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Legalizing drugs will produce a nation of zombies who are impossible to live with individually and who will impose their stunted mentalities politically.

Too late, Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, etc.

22 posted on 12/04/2001 4:43:33 AM PST by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ravinson
Substitute the word "guns" for "drugs" and you can use the same narrow-minded arguments to scare people into giving up their 2nd Amendment liberties.

Yawn the old drugs are morally equal to guns arguement.

Firearems help save innocent life and property, please tell me the last time when the recreational(addictive) use of a joint, crack pipe, or heroin needle have saved a life.

23 posted on 12/04/2001 4:43:59 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RLK
How long, after legalization, will it take you to turn into a zombie?
24 posted on 12/04/2001 4:50:36 AM PST by fod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fod
A Zombie!!! Must be that haitian voodoo weed I been hearing about...They really shouldn't legalize that, you know, Cause it turns you into a Zombie, Just like in scooby-doo, oh wait, that's Mr. Pinkerdale with a Zombie mask! It's not the result of legalization.

Good work Zelma!

25 posted on 12/04/2001 4:58:17 AM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: perez24
Your argument doesn't hold up because there's nothing the in the constitution which guarantees the right to use drugs.

I suppose that is why it took an amendment to the Constitution to wage a war on alcohol.

BTW, your arguement holds water if you interpret certain clauses like a tax and spend and create a welfare state to control behavior liberal...

26 posted on 12/04/2001 4:58:55 AM PST by fod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: perez24
That the Consitution and the Declaration of Independence are written on hemp fiber, notwithstanding.
27 posted on 12/04/2001 5:01:44 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Yawn the old drugs are morally equal to guns arguement.

Yawn; the old "if something does not provde utility to me, then I can have the government inprison and kill you for possessing it" argument.

28 posted on 12/04/2001 5:02:56 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
It was Alexander Hamilton who eloquently argued against a Bill of Rights for fear that later generations would claim those were the only protected rights.
29 posted on 12/04/2001 5:03:02 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FF578
Good grief, this article is nothing more than emotional quasi-marxist tripe.

I wonder what this idiot's view on gun control is

This really did need a "barf alert"

30 posted on 12/04/2001 5:08:35 AM PST by fod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
That the Consitution and the Declaration of Independence are written on hemp fiber, notwithstanding.

Perhaps this is the real reason the DEA recently banned all hemp products--another endrun around the document

31 posted on 12/04/2001 5:11:14 AM PST by fod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
LOL
32 posted on 12/04/2001 5:13:19 AM PST by fod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Yawn the old drugs are morally equal to guns arguement

Wake up. That's not the argument. The point is that you drug warriors use the same flawed thinking as the gun grabbers. In other words, drugs are not morally equal to guns; you are morally equal to Rosie O'Donnell!

33 posted on 12/04/2001 5:17:17 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ravinson
Or alcohol, or cigaretts, or high fat foods, or rock climbing, or bungie jumping, or sky diving, or ?????????????.
34 posted on 12/04/2001 5:17:20 AM PST by Mikey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
It was Alexander Hamilton who eloquently argued against a Bill of Rights for fear that later generations would claim those were the only protected rights

Yes, it is so sad to see FReepers who don't understand this.

35 posted on 12/04/2001 5:19:00 AM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: perez24
Check out the 9th &10th Amendments.
36 posted on 12/04/2001 5:19:15 AM PST by Mikey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
Gotten tired of being laughed off the Harry Potter and creationism threads?
37 posted on 12/04/2001 5:19:25 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alpowolf
Wake up. That's not the argument. The point is that you drug warriors use the same flawed thinking as the gun grabbers. In other words, drugs are not morally equal to guns; you are morally equal to Rosie O'Donnell!

Zing! You got it.

38 posted on 12/04/2001 5:20:07 AM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: FF578
much more carcinogenic than tobacco, which means it supresses the human immune system

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

39 posted on 12/04/2001 5:20:54 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Inconceivable!!;-)
40 posted on 12/04/2001 5:22:58 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 521-530 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson