Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Support for Arabs plummets in America, opinion poll finds
Ha'aretz ^ | Dec. 26, 2001 | Nitzan Horowitz

Posted on 12/26/2001 9:21:53 AM PST by Alouette

Levels of support among Americans for moderate Arab states and Washington's Arab allies have dropped to an all-time low, according to new survey by Zogby International. Arab American groups have called the results "shocking," saying that the figures show a dramatic shift in Americans' attitude toward the Arab world.

Only 10 percent of Americans view the Palestinian Authority favorably, compared to a huge 72 percent that are totally unsympathetic toward the PA, according to a recent comprehensive poll in the U.S. on Washington's attitude toward the Middle East and the Israeli-Arab conflict.

The lowest ever level of support was recorded for Egpyt and Saudi Arabia. Only 24 percent of those asked saw Saudi Arabia in a positive light, while 58 percent held negative views about the kingdom.

Israel, in complete contrast, prompted the opposite response, with 59 percent of Americans expressing positive opinions on Israel, compared to 28 percent who held negative views.

A closer look at the Zogby poll on the Middle East shows that there has been little change in U.S. attitude toward Israel since the start of the Oslo peace process: 61 percent support in 1993 compared to 59 percent today. Following the September 11 attacks, the October poll recorded a 68 percent support rate for Israel, which has since declined, returning to its 60 percent average. The percentage of those who view Israel negatively, however, has risen since October from 14 percent to the current 28 percent.

American public opinion toward the Arab world has undergone a complete turnabout: In 1993, some 64 percent of respondents expressed a favorable opinion of Egypt, compared to just 38 percent today. The months of October and November saw the sharpest drop. Saudia Arabia has never won many hearts and minds in the U.S., but support has plummeted from 56 percent at the start of 2001 to just 24 percent currently.

The respondents were given a list of countries and asked which they considered to be good or bad allies of the U.S. Some 52 percent responded that Israel was a very good or generally good ally of Washington, with just 28 percent giving the same answer for Egypt and 22 percent for Saudia Arabia.

In October, respondents explained their negative attitude to the Arab states because of their "relations with terrorists," that "one can't know what their position is," and because "they can't be trusted."

There has not however been a significant change in the American public's attitude toward the Israeli-Arab conflict since the September attacks, with 61 percent of respondents saying that the Israelis and Palestinians were equally to blame. There was however a slight fall in the percentage of those who see Israel as solely responsible for the conflict, dropping from 6 percent three years ago to just 4 percent currently. The number of respondents who believe the Palestinians are to blame rose more sharply from 9 percent in 1998, to 24 percent today.

The Arab lobby in Washington is blaming the "anti-Arab propaganda campaign" that has been waged since the September 11 attacks for the shift in attitude.

James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute and brother of the editor of the survey, John Zogby, said that "what the results show is that a tremendous task confronts those who value the relationship and the pursuit of Middle East peace ... The downward slide can be arrested and reversed, but it will require a concerted effort."

Zogby blamed a "steady diet of anti-Arab information" for the swing in public opinion, saying that "those who are seeking to disrupt and discredit the relationship are working overtime."

"Work must be done and it should begin before more damage occurs," he stressed.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201 next last
To: Alouette
Zogby blamed a "steady diet of anti-Arab information" for the swing in public opinion, saying that "those who are seeking to disrupt and discredit the relationship are working overtime."

No Mr Zogby...I think a bunch of maniac Arabs flying airliners full of men women and children into occupied bldgs full of innocent civilian men, women and children...while other arab maniacs all over the world danced in the street at the news of their demise is the reason for this swing in public opinion.

101 posted on 12/26/2001 11:29:50 AM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
There's the problem. Zogby shows he's just a lefty concerned with "representation" of and "perception" about other nations, rather than facts.
Actually the average American is more informed about the mid-east than any "western" people I've met. Note that "61 percent of respondents saying that the Israelis and Palestinians were equally to blame", certainly a snetiment one doesn't find much at FR.

Can't seem to make up your mind?
61% of respondents have succumbed to Muslim/Arabprop and combined it with the pathetic combination of PC and ignorance.

If anything, this story demonstrates that the "average American" is profoundly ignorant, but never hesitant to voice his opinion.

102 posted on 12/26/2001 11:31:22 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
RobRoy: LOL! But 61%? That's high. I remember people not politically inclined talking about the Saudis first when Prince Talal made his "reexamine your ties to Israel" deflection. It was amazing that in the media they tried to turn this into just some intemperate but "based in truth" statement. But regular people I knew often commented on the obvious hypocrisy of the statement--e.g. "Doesn't Osama hate the Prince and his government the most? What is he reexamining?" But the PC media, unlike common sensical people, is more concerned with constructing foreign problems as having no internal or historical context unless it can be fashioned to criticize America.
103 posted on 12/26/2001 11:32:17 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: xJones
Dear sir or madam, you are brilliant. police their own. Something many groups should be looking into doing.
104 posted on 12/26/2001 11:35:31 AM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: randog
Somehow I'm supposed to believe that some goat herder in Bumfuq, Egypt has a better grasp on the world order than I do.

Well, that's one way to look at it.

Of course I believe that using the invidiousness tool among the rest of the world's ignorant works like a charm.
That's why Communism survived almost a hundred years.
Ignorance and poverty does rule most of the world, so yes, they do have a firmer grasp of the "current world order".

105 posted on 12/26/2001 11:38:45 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Can't seem to make up your mind? 61% of respondents have succumbed to Muslim/Arabprop and combined it with the pathetic combination of PC and ignorance

I mean, at FR, there are many anti-Israel disruptors and Israel can do no wrong posters. The latter reveal its allegiances, affinities, or tastes. The former, especially lefty disruptors, reveal none because they would have to confront that their pseudo-intellectual obsessions are founded in either nihilism or reactionary anti-Americanism--they are faithless in any form. Israel isn't perfect, who is? But I agree with you ~98% that most anti-Israel statements are Arabprop and reactionary lefty adversarialism.

106 posted on 12/26/2001 11:39:48 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
The pan-arabist cabal between Saudis, Yemenis, Moroccans and Arab Expatriots in Afghanistan among others was exposed and their failure to act against it in advance revealed them to be weak minded & weak willed, and very dangerous.

You are being way too kind.
I believe they were complicit.

107 posted on 12/26/2001 11:40:42 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I think you're right for the most part. They are definitely westernized, so whether Pan Arab Islamic, 'Aryan", neo-nazi, or leftist ideologically (the anti-war.com group), they share a common cause as you stated.

When I note "Pan Arab Islamic" by the way, I mean Muslims who have bought into the Arab Nationalism ideology which inevitably is a blame the west and "zionism" belief. Muslims who have divested themselves of this insidious ideology (a minority comparatively) are for the most part not inclined to engage in this type of anti-western and "zionist" rhetoric. This is characteristic of the Turks for example, who, under the leadership of Ataturk, knew that Arab Nationalism combined with Islam was a regressive force.

108 posted on 12/26/2001 11:41:13 AM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
I'd like to see an honest poll of Afganistan locals and how they feel about arabs. Afganis are not arab and the arabs they catch that have been fighting for al queda have been sumarily shot then tortured. Just what I think we whould do to them.
109 posted on 12/26/2001 11:42:07 AM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Amazing that an Opinion Pollster doesn't understand the difference between an opinion and an action.

There may well be large numbers of Americans with an unfavorable opinion of Arabs, but there are large numbers of Arabs and other Muslims who have taken unfavorable (and that's a charitible categorization) actions that are anti-American.

There's is a world of difference, and thousands of dead Americans, between these two.

110 posted on 12/26/2001 11:44:19 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette;Islamic_Violence
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Islamic_Violence

Click here: Islamic_Violence

111 posted on 12/26/2001 11:44:35 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopDog2
. But the Israeli first crowd will make sure the Arabs are turned into beasts.

No, we non-Jews who feel passionately about Israel's right to exist simply acknowledge reality, and we make sure that the fact that they act like beasts does not go unnoticed.

112 posted on 12/26/2001 11:45:47 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
No, we non-Jews who feel passionately about Israel's right to exist simply acknowledge reality, and we make sure that the fact that they act like beasts does not go unnoticed.

Btttt. Well said.

113 posted on 12/26/2001 11:47:32 AM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: StopTheGuilt
This is clearly a sarcastic statement. The one on post #26 I still fail to see the sarcasm.

I can't help you over the hurdle, but everyone else seemed to understand. I'll say it plainly for you:

THE ISLAMIC LEADERS DO NOT CONDEMN TERRORISM DONE IN THE NAME OF ALLAH AND THEREBY THEY CONDONE IT. WE ARE IN TROUBLE UNTIL THIS IS STOPPED.

BTW, don't bother me again, I don't like using caps.

114 posted on 12/26/2001 11:48:46 AM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Zogby blamed a "steady diet of anti-Arab information" Like the news. ML/NJ

How about the facts?

115 posted on 12/26/2001 11:50:22 AM PST by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
Most news organizations are "working overtime" to cast Arabs and Muslims in as positive a light as possible.

This makes one wonder what will happen if the time ever comes to choose sides for the sake of survival.
Will these people be remembered for their contribution to the problem?

116 posted on 12/26/2001 11:51:53 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Ack! I was quoting someone else there!
117 posted on 12/26/2001 11:54:55 AM PST by TopDog2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
No Mr Zogby...I think a bunch of maniac Arabs flying airliners full of men women and children into occupied bldgs full of innocent civilian men, women and children...while other arab maniacs all over the world danced in the street at the news of their demise is the reason for this swing in public opinion.

Methinks that thou has just hit one out of the park with this post. Home RUN!

(Some people just need things spelled out for them, I guess. And you seem to be a good speller!)

118 posted on 12/26/2001 11:55:36 AM PST by BenR2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
But I agree with you ~98% that most anti-Israel statements are Arabprop and reactionary lefty adversarialism.

I am happy to hear at least the suggestion that doing so may not make me an Israeli firster.
But the sadness kicks in when I realize how much of the Muslim/Arabprop is taken at face value, and what that says for our fellow Americans.

119 posted on 12/26/2001 12:08:54 PM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
Thanks. Seems so patently obvious, doesn't it?
120 posted on 12/26/2001 12:11:48 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson