Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. grants China permanent normal trade status
Kansas City Star ^ | 12/27/01 | SCOTT LINDLAW

Posted on 12/29/2001 12:15:26 AM PST by Enemy Of The State

U.S. grants China permanent normal trade status

By SCOTT LINDLAW - The Associated Press
Date: 12/27/01 22:15

CRAWFORD, Texas -- President Bush granted China permanent normal trade status Thursday, ending a quarter-century policy of using access to U.S. markets as an annual enticement to the Chinese to expand political and economic freedoms.

The president's decision will end yearly battles in Congress that have been waged since 1980 and that sometimes divided the Democratic Party during the Clinton years. The decision was set up by China's admission last month to the World Trade Organization.

Bush called the trade proclamation the "final step in normalizing U.S.-China trade relations" and said it would open up the vast Chinese markets to billions of dollars in American goods.

The new trade status will take effect Jan. 1, Bush said in the announcement, which was released in Crawford, Texas, where he is vacationing.

Bush's proclamation formally removed China from having to adhere to the 1974 Jackson-Vanik Amendment to the Trade Act of 1974. The amendment, initially aimed at the former Soviet Union's restrictions against Jewish emigration, withholds normal trade relations with communist states that restrict emigration.

Since 1980, China has enjoyed temporary normal trade relations with the United States under annual presidential waivers of the law. But each waiver has prompted debates in Congress over China's record on human rights and weapons proliferation.

The last debate occurred in July, when the House voted 259-169 to approve Bush's waiver this year, the last that will be necessary.

The annual congressional battle pitted American business and its Republican allies against big labor and its Democratic supporters. President Bill Clinton, at odds with many in his own party, started the process of moving China toward permanent trade status before he left office.

Congress last year granted the permanent status to China contingent upon its entry into the World Trade Organization. Its application was formally accepted at the organization's annual meeting last month in the United Arab Emirates.

The annual struggle also inflamed tensions with China each year and prompted worries in that country every time it arose.

China and the United States reached an agreement, as part of China's WTO entry, that will lower China's tariffs on U.S. goods and open up its service sector to American companies.

China's tariffs on U.S.-made goods are to fall from an overall average of 25 percent to 9 percent by 2005. Duties on America's primary farm products are to drop from 31 percent to 14 percent.

China has an $80 billion trade surplus with the United States.

Bush has long supported trade with Beijing, even during the standoff over a U.S. spy plane that collided with a Chinese jet fighter and made an emergency landing on Chinese territory early this year.

In asking Congress for a temporary extension in June, Bush argued that normal relations would benefit the American economy and promote an "economically open, politically stable and secure China."

Trade with China helps American farmers and American business, Bush said. Last year, he said, U.S. farmers exported goods to China and Hong Kong worth more than $3 billion, and American businesses increased exports to China by 24 percent.




TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

To: nasamn777
At the same time they pretend to be friendly with us. Hmmm.

Quitcher winin. Dubya knows best. As for those slave laborers, etc. whatchabitchinabout. Walmart has socks on sale today from China. No sense not sending cash to a country and not granting MFN status when those industrious guys and gals can make 6 pair of socks and sell them to me for 2 bucks. Makes 'em disposable. Jiang said it in a speech today. All China wants, and all the Chinese people want, is peace.

Peace in our time. Peace on our terms. Peace of your country. Peace means you sell us more technology, let us steal more of your secrets to take back Taiwan, then that other pesky Chinese nation Japan, then maybe San Francisco...lots of Chinese there.

If Clinton was bad because he sold out to the Chinese, and Bush is supposed to be good because he sold out to the Chinese...oh well, I'm sure one of the Bushleaguers will explain.

63 posted on 01/01/2002 12:21:18 AM PST by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
There is a big difference between Clinton and Bush! Clinton was actively aiding the Chinese by giving John Huang his job at the Department of Commerce. Also, Clinton allowed sensitive military technology transfers to China. At the same time, Clinton recieved political funding from the Chinese. Much more could be said about Clintons sell out of America.

Bush has done nothing like Clinton. He believes that economic cooperation will eventually bring China around. I believe this is a mistake in his foreign policy, but there is nothing unethical about it or even close to what Clinton did.
64 posted on 01/01/2002 4:57:58 PM PST by nasamn777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
It is difficult to determine whether products are made in China or the U.S. of A. It's all part of the so called 'global capitalism' approach which is really international communism.
65 posted on 01/01/2002 5:04:17 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade,ChaseR
Well there is nothing noble or humanitarian about the Chinese. My friend has worked with these people and knows them very well. From their one-child policy to literally destroying a company, it's hard to say that these people create anything at all. Much of our military technology has been stolen and sent back to the PRC thanks to Clinton. Furthermore, they stick their communist flags on company bulletin boards (one person I know found one of these flags, took it and threw it in the bathroom urinal). Last but not least, they hire their own people in American firms. TRW is a perfect example of such a company going down the tubes.
66 posted on 01/01/2002 5:14:59 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: super175; goldilucky; backhoe; flamefront; abigail2; Victoria Delsoul
Bump again for your posts/BTTT
67 posted on 01/01/2002 7:11:28 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
"Much of our military technology has been stolen and sent back to the PRC thanks to Clinton."

HILLARY CLINTON -U. S. SENATOR- IS A KEY DEFENDENT IN LORAL SHAREHOLERS CASE ie. CHINAGATE

68 posted on 01/01/2002 7:13:42 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Re: #36

This whole PNTR thing did not originate with Bush or Clinton. It goes way on back to the Kissinger era.

Basically what this whole thing is about is... Back in the 70's when trade started the US required annual reviews of China trade based on all kinds of stuff. They extended them a package, then told the Chinese 'we are going to review it every single year'.

With the thing now, the package has not changed. Not the one we gave them at least. The only thing we did is end those annual reviews. It did not change any of the framework at all as far as I know.

I think we did that because it is required for China's WTO entry. Why is WTO important? It is not that it will give China more access to the US, but it will give the US more access to China. Supposedly it will make trade more reciprocal. At least thats the theory.

69 posted on 01/01/2002 8:45:55 PM PST by super175
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: super175
I think we did that because it is required for China's WTO entry.

Actually, we made PNTR dependent on China joining the WTO, not the other way around. But you've got the essentials right. However, Bush is the one who made it permaaent, i.e., not subject to annual review.

70 posted on 01/02/2002 4:10:01 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
In this respect, business dealings with, catering to, and the continued siphoning of our manufacturing and industrial base to the Red Chinese who represent the antithisis of what our nation is supposed to be ... it has been business as usual ... and it is an irresponsible and a danmgerous business:

Dragon's Fury - Breath of Fire - A story of the coming Third World War with Red China

71 posted on 01/02/2002 4:22:54 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I couldnt agree with you more and the fact is that its only going to get worse considering the fact that big business is the side seat driver in D.C. Politics.

thanks for the link to your book. Ive checked out the site and have been considering purchasing one of the D/L's. I dont suppose you offer any hard copies yet do you?

Regards!
EOTS

72 posted on 01/02/2002 11:58:32 AM PST by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Yes, you can order a hard copy. It comes in Trade Paper Back format. We've sold a couple of hundred thus far.

Here's what it looks like:

Picture of printed book

... and here's the order form from the site for the same:

Printed Book Order Form

73 posted on 01/02/2002 6:24:19 PM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Gee that's great! Just kick her commie butte!
74 posted on 01/02/2002 8:22:57 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson