Posted on 01/09/2002 3:39:27 AM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
US President George W. Bush is sceptical about American Airlines' claim that it removed an Arab-American agent in Bush's security team from a plane for being "hostile".
"I know the man, I am most appreciative of his service to me and my wife. He is an honorable fellow," Bush said.
"I would be surprised if he was hostile."
The US Secret Service, which is responsible for presidential security, said in late December it had launched an inquiry into why the agent, headed to Texas to protect a holidaying Bush, was removed from the aircraft.
The agent, speaking through his lawyers, said he was barred from the Baltimore (Maryland) to Dallas (Texas) flight because of his ethnicity, amid fears sparked by the September 11 terrorist strikes.
"If he was mistreated because of his ethnicity, I'm going to be plenty hot. That means angry," Bush said.
But he added: "I wasn't there, so it's hard for me to comment on something which I did not see."
how come all the people arguing against the pilot don't read any of the facts ?
Armed passenger * flight 363 BWI/DFW. Flight was scheduled to leave at 1715. I was notified that due to a mechanical at the next gate - they would hold our push for approximately 30-40 minutes to try to accommodate those pax going to DFW. A few moments later the *1 flt attendant brought to my attention that she and other flt att were concerned about the actions of one of the pax. This pax left the aircraft with carryon bags still in his seat. He told the flt att. Please don’t leave without him. While the pax was away a flt att observed books in the individuals seat which were written in what she assessed was Arabic style print. Upon further investigation - when the individual came back it was determined that he was in fact our ‘armed passenger’.
Allow me to correct you and help you keep up with the story. Portion of text of captain's written statement already posted on this thread.
"Armed passenger * flight 363 BWI/DFW. Flight was scheduled to leave at 1715. I was notified that due to a mechanical at the next gate - they would hold our push for approximately 30-40 minutes to try to accommodate those pax going to DFW. A few moments later the *1 flt attendant brought to my attention that she and other flt att were concerned about the actions of one of the pax. This pax left the aircraft with carryon bags still in his seat. He told the flt att. Please don’t leave without him. While the pax was away a flt att observed books in the individuals seat which were written in what she assessed was Arabic style print. Upon further investigation - when the individual came back it was determined that he was in fact our ‘armed passenger’. I then decided to stop my pre-flt and review the AA E2. The form was unreadable because it was a carbon-copy and there were missing items.
regards
regards
If Bush were to even remotely suggest or imply any criticism of this ninny agent, the ACLU, People for the UnAmerican Way, Action Jackson, and the rest of the Race-Baiting Clymers would begin an all-out new "Bush is a racist" assault in the media. It's totally unproductive for Bush to hand these Clymers a bat to beat him over the head with, especially during a time of war.
I understand EXACTLY why Bush is making these comments, and it just goes to show Bush keeps foiling his enemies by ignoring their rather transparent traps.
We, here, do not affect overall airline security on a national basis with our rantings amongst ourselves. Bush does, and should have shut up, at least until all the facts are out.
All Bush said was the agent was honorable and that he would be surprised. That is hardly a show of support.
In fact, that was almost the precise words I used when I was confronted with a dishonest act done by an employee of mine. I wasn't supportive of her behavior. I was surprised and up until then I would not have expected that.
All Bush said was the agent was honorable and that he would be surprised.
Nice selective editing on your part. Of course that is not ALL he said. He added:
"If he was mistreated because of his ethnicity, I'm going to be plenty hot. That means angry," Bush said.
There was no need to make that sort of speculation without the facts. It was an irresponsible thing to say.
Right on! We know for certain the group responsible, they are muslin male mideasterners. I would feel a lot safer if they included a voice analyzer at the gate to ferret these guys out. Why hassel 99% of the passengers ( shoe checks, pat downs) for no safety effective reason.
IMO and many others, the 1% we're talking about range from religious fanatic to intimidated supporter. They are the clear and present danger.
As the facts have come out, it appears the pilot not only erred on the side of caution with good reason, he went too far in trying to be accomdating. The pilot should have simply said that the notice of 45 minutes is too short to clear any gun toting passenger. Also, I would like to hear that the airlines try and institute a minimum time rule.
It's quite clear that YOU WERE.
Wrong. Based on the total disconnect between your bizarre response, "Welcome to FR. What brings you here - is the "Storm Front" website down?" and the content of ANYTHING anyone else has posted, my comments were a general observation. You're a bigot and you've already outed yourself as an anti-semite. You've also engaged in some strange rantings over mental health issues -- presumably reflecting some sort of personal experience of yours.
Just read over your posts -- you sound like a total loon.
More paranoid rantings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.