Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second Video of Flight 587 Casts Doubt on Crash Probe
NewsMax.com ^ | Jan. 27, 2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 01/27/2002 11:38:36 AM PST by Carl/NewsMax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2002 11:38:37 AM PST by Carl/NewsMax (limbacher@newsmax.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Carl/NewsMax
Damn, it's starting to look like maybe the "tin foil hat" crowd might not be too far off the mark on this one. Interesting.
3 posted on 01/27/2002 11:45:51 AM PST by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
LINK

Carl:

Can you get Bob Grant or Frank from Queens to interview the police Lt and the NYC fireman mentioned in this article?

4 posted on 01/27/2002 11:52:35 AM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Have no doubt of this: Had there been only one plane involved on 9/11, the federal government would have concocted an elaborate account of the pilot's deep depression. Desperate to prevent panic and to protect us from our unenlightened selves, Washington will cover up anything it cannot possibly explain away. I'll settle for the truth, thank you very much...
5 posted on 01/27/2002 11:55:49 AM PST by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldvike
Damn, it's starting to look like maybe the "tin foil hat" crowd might not be too far off the mark on this one. Interesting.

The only possible way they could be right is if the tape showed an explosion. That seems doubtful: Nov. 12, the day of the crash, was a cloudless day in New York, a fact that makes that "puff of white smoke" particularly problematic for investigators who have bent over backwards to ignore the accounts of dozens of eyewitnesses who say they saw a midair explosion and fire before the plane broke apart.

There's a pretty vast difference between a "puff of white smoke", and "midair explosion and fire," Mr. Lamebacker's efforts notwithstanding.

So if this is all NewsMax -- itself a tinfoil-leaning group -- can say, then the tinfoilers are as wrong as they usually are. Note that none of the details add up to anything that a loss of the vertical stabilizer cannot explain.

6 posted on 01/27/2002 11:57:51 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Still think this might have been a shoe bomber. That was my first thought after that Reid guy tried it. It surely couldn't be the first attempt to do something like that.
7 posted on 01/27/2002 12:02:27 PM PST by MsLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
The NTSB is nothing but a worthless cover-up agency. I would never work for them.

In the hours and days after the crash of flight 587, the NTSB was floating every crackpot theory it could in an effort to disprove theories of terrorism. Their efforts had quite the opposite effect. It tends to kill an organization's credibility when they scream, "It wasn't terrorism, it wasn't terrorism...!" while the crash site is still burning and no data collection has even been done yet, then float every crackpot theory under the sun to "prove" it. What ever happened to the days of the NTSB not commenting on an on-going investigation? I find their actions highly questionable.

8 posted on 01/27/2002 12:06:08 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Perhaps it didn't need to be a big fireball explosion to bring it down. It could have been a shoe bomb that exploded cracking the hull of the plane. I would think that would be enough to bring it down.
9 posted on 01/27/2002 12:06:50 PM PST by MsLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Perhaps it didn't need to be a big fireball explosion to bring it down. It could have been a shoe bomb that exploded cracking the hull of the plane. I would think that would be enough to bring it down.
10 posted on 01/27/2002 12:07:16 PM PST by MsLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

I hate when that happens!!!
11 posted on 01/27/2002 12:08:39 PM PST by MsLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
But if it was a "bomber" (shoe or otherwise) wouldn't someone (or some group) have taken credit for it ??
I know that bin Laden rarely took credit for "operations" that he was a part of, but after 9-11 that seemed to change.
I would think there would be some sort of bragging or claim of success ??
12 posted on 01/27/2002 12:08:46 PM PST by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MsLady
That's what I heard on the radio ...that they thought it was a shoe bomber.
13 posted on 01/27/2002 12:13:18 PM PST by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: twyn1
Who says that some group didn't claim responsibility, and it was hushed up? john
14 posted on 01/27/2002 12:16:28 PM PST by Freeper john
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Freeper john
Who says that some group didn't claim responsibility, and it was hushed up?

Maybe you're onto something there. The whole thing just stinks.

15 posted on 01/27/2002 12:23:58 PM PST by katnip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
what, you going to believe your own lying eyes (that is, if the film is ever released)?

i won't be convinced until the cia releases their cartoon.

where's the cartoon?

16 posted on 01/27/2002 12:27:21 PM PST by glock rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
"...Mr. Lamebacker's efforts notwithstanding"

I can understand disagreeing with him, but is a personal insult necessary to make a point?

17 posted on 01/27/2002 12:35:09 PM PST by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: *AA Flight 587
bump
18 posted on 01/27/2002 12:43:03 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MsLady
Semtex or C-4 would have left chemical traces on the wreckage. It should be an easy matter to rule it out -- or confirm it.
19 posted on 01/27/2002 12:54:31 PM PST by Crowcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Stall spin. PC spinning otherwise.
20 posted on 01/27/2002 1:03:32 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson