Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski
Wasn't the mom at the same bar as the suspect at one point that evening? Maybe I misunderstood this. Someone please correct me if I'm mistaken. If true, I thought that that was very weird.
19 posted on 02/11/2002 5:19:05 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: mewzilla
From the San Diego Union Tribune:

Parents becoming focus of public's interest in case
By Bruce Lieberman and Preston Turegano
February 9, 2002

All week, media across the nation buzzed about the abduction of a child from her bedroom in northern San Diego.

Danielle van Dam is still missing, but by yesterday the public's attention was shifting to the girl's parents, as accusations and talk-radio diatribes threatened to drown out news of the investigation.

The founder of a group that posted a $10,000 reward for Danielle's safe return suggested the police investigate her family. Radio talk-show conversations questioned the lifestyle of Brenda and Damon van Dam; television and newspaper reporters began asking them about it.

The Internet has been teeming with messages about Danielle and her parents. While some come to the van Dams' defense, the bulk are angry with the parents, and many of the messages are mean-spirited. They address everything from rumors of the parents' lifestyle to their statements that they didn't check on their children after a door was found open at night.

The van Dams, who discovered their 7-year-old daughter missing from her bed a week ago today, became household names almost overnight as they made the rounds of national television shows, pleading for Danielle's return.

They have used the reach of the Internet to ask for help in finding her. A Web site set up by neighbors provides a downloadable poster of the child and asks viewers to distribute it as widely as possible.

The shift in the response to the van Dams ? from sympathetic to nasty ? was swift as the couple tried in vain to keep the focus on the search for their daughter.

A family spokeswoman said the van Dams would not comment yesterday about the flurry of allegations.

One of the most outspoken critics was Douglas Pierce, who only days before posted a $10,000 reward for Danielle's return. Pierce, who describes his group, the Millennium Children's Fund, as a nonprofit advocacy group for abused children, said he was disturbed by what he saw during his eight hours in the van Dam home Wednesday.

He felt the parents lacked emotion, and said he was put off by what he described as their repeated rehearsals before facing the media.

The van Dams and several advisers plan what the parents say and how they look on television and in newspapers, Pierce said. "They were talking about their makeup and how they look in the camera," he added.

Pierce said the van Dams' two sons, 5 and 10, should be taken from the home while police search for Danielle.

Although he found no evidence to believe the van Dams are tied directly to their daughter's disappearance, Pierce said he decided to ask for outside protection for the children after observing the family, its public-relations team and a journal entry by Danielle that he said suggested conflict with her father.

Pierce said he was shocked when Brenda van Dam showed him Danielle's journal. " 'Daddy, please forgive me,' " Pierce said one entry read. " 'Daddy please love me. Danielle.' "

"After my personal observation, I'm asking for a wake-up call from the San Diego Police Department to investigate the family," Pierce said.

Pierce's comments enraged the van Dams.

"Douglas Pierce is some kind of freak who came into our house," Damon van Dam told a Los Angeles radio station Thursday. He called Pierce "evil."

"He is trying to start trouble for us," Brenda van Dam said. "We did not invite him into our house."

A few days ago, the van Dams began to get questions on television about their private life. Delicate questions became pointed yesterday when San Diego radio talk-show host Rick Roberts criticized the van Dams on the air for "not being honest" about "what really occurred" the night their daughter disappeared.

Roberts told his listeners that a "reliable" source "high in law enforcement" said the van Dams have engaged in "lots of wife-swapping." Saying he believes the source, Roberts reported activity by the van Dams on the night of Feb. 1 dramatically different from their description to the news media.

Roberts repeated his source's allegations for four hours, interrupted mainly by callers angry at the van Dams.

During a break in his 3-to-7 p.m. show on KFMB-AM 760 titled "The Court of Public Opinion," Roberts told The San Diego Union-Tribune he decided to go public with what his source told him because the van Dams' two young sons remain at home and "may be exposed to the couple's lifestyle."

When asked if he thought his comments were slanderous or unethical, Roberts said: "No, not at all. This is not a court of law. It's a court of public opinion. If anyone thinks they're slanderous, they can subpoena me."

Roberts said he told his program director he intended to disclose the source's information and that the director did not object.

Ed Trimble, president and chief operating officer of KFMB-TV and radio, could not be reached for comment after the show.

27 posted on 02/11/2002 5:27:20 PM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: mewzilla
Wasn't the mom at the same bar as the suspect at one point that evening? Maybe I misunderstood this. Someone please correct me if I'm mistaken. If true, I thought that that was very weird.

The last interview I saw with the way too composed mom, she INSISTED on calling it a "Cafe" and corrected the interviewer whenever they used the term 'bar'. Not exactly the kind of detail I would be worried about if my kid was snatched.

70 posted on 02/11/2002 6:04:36 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: mewzilla
Yea I heard the Mother was at the bar and so was the neighbor that is a suspect. This entire story is suspect. So reminiscent of the Ramsey's except no signs of foul play yet.
460 posted on 02/12/2002 4:53:30 AM PST by Blackdakota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: mewzilla
OK, I put on my Colombo hat. Here is what happened. Mom came back to the house with a couple of guys, who all were a bit drunk. Sex was the main event, with the husband sleeping. At different times, all of the guys probably excused themselves to relieve themselves in the bathroom, which was probably next door to the girls room. One of the guys decided to have sex with the girl. He woke her, she made some noise, he covered her mouth....and eventually suffocated to death. He went back in, and picked up his clothing and left. Mom didn't notice nothing, and she eventually fell asleep. The killer returned knowing the backdoor was open. He took the body to make it appear to be a kidnapping. He likely drove less than an hour away and dumped the body and made sure nothing in terms of evidence would be seen in the car (body stuffed in a garbage bag prior to putting in a car). The parents can claim innocence, because they didn't know of her murder, but they likely set the situation up with strangers in the house, and caused the murder to occur.
882 posted on 02/14/2002 10:15:37 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson