Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams: Grace Under Fire
Capitalism Magazine ^ | Feb 23, 2002 | Larry Elder

Posted on 02/23/2002 7:06:31 AM PST by The Raven

Someday, many of their critics will apologize. Who am I talking about?

Two economists, who happen to be black, Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams.

For over 30 years, Thomas Sowell, currently with the Hoover Institution, and Walter Williams, chairman of the economics department at George Mason University, led the charge against the "victicrat" mindset. Through decades of weekly columns, books, speeches and lectures before often-hostile crowds, they long argued that racism cannot be blamed for poverty, crime, illegitimacy, and under-performing schools.

Over 20 years ago, Sowell appeared on William F. Buckley Jr.'s PBS show, "Firing Line," and calmly dismantled the basis for affirmative action, arguing it immoral, divisive, and unconstitutional. In his 1989 book, "South Africa's War against Capitalism," Williams noted that white racists under South Africa's apartheid used minimum wage laws to suppress black employment. Both men demonstrated with -- get this -- facts, data, studies, experience, and personal observation that, no, the black middle class did not spring from affirmative action, urban renewal programs, enterprise zones, welfare benefits or set-aside programs. Racism, they point out persuasively, is bad for capitalism.

In Thomas Sowell's masterful trilogy, "Race and Culture"; "Migrations and Cultures"; and "Conquests and Cultures," Sowell traveled around the world seeking an answer to this question: Why do some groups survive and thrive under the most adverse conditions while others disappear? His answer? People who possess cultural capital -- a reverence for education, strength in family, and self-reliance -- endure.

Their reward? Former NAACP President Benjamin Hooks called people like Sowell and Williams "a new breed of Uncle Tom ... some of the biggest liars the world ever saw." Liars? For saying that the welfare state has done more to destabilize the black family than Jim Crow laws ever did?

Oreo. Uncle Tom. Boot-licking Uncle Tom. Straight-up Uncle Tom. Judas. Boy. Bug-eyed. Foot-shuffling. Sugarcane Negro. Handkerchief head. Trojan Horse. Anti-black. Pro-white. Remus. Sambo. Sambo-Tom. The Anti-Christ. Clarence Thomas supporter. Sniveling weasel. Evil. Ass-kisser. Coconut. Wannabe white. Nickering nabob of negativity. This catalog of names I've been called comes from my new book, "The Ten Things You Can't Say in America." Can you imagine the hate mail, including death threats, bombarding Sowell's and Williams' mailboxes for the last 30 years?

Black conservatives, goes the attack, take their marching orders and receive funds from the "White Racist Power Structure." Yet, according to Peter Noel of the "Village Voice," Jesse Jackson's Wall Street contributors forced Jackson to tone down his rhetoric (he called President-elect Bush "illegitimate") and put in a call to Bush!

Similarly, a few years ago, the NAACP faced a financial crisis. Declining membership and a sex-discrimination scandal by then-President Ben Chavis made headlines. One of the NAACP's principal donors, the Ford Foundation, withheld its $500,000 contribution until the organization cleaned up its act. So who's singing and who's dancing?

A few years ago, Rev. Jesse Jackson and I appeared on television to discuss whether blacks, at last, possess full civil rights. Jackson spoke about the wealth gap between blacks and whites, the lack of "access to capital." Problems remain, I said, but blacks now enjoy full "civil rights." Wealth, while desirable, is not something guaranteed by the Constitution. Rev. Jackson responded, "Mr. Elder identifies with white males." Typical. Dodge the merits of the argument and malign your opponent through the practiced, if unfair, use of the "if-you're-black-and-don't-think-of-yourself-as-a-victim-you-must-be-a-self-loathing-Uncle-Tom" attack.

Virtually every big city newspaper has the obligatory Angry Black Writer sounding the same themes: The country screws blacks; banks refuse to lend them money; cops routinely brutalize blacks; the SAT is culturally biased; racist insurance companies practice red-lining. Addressing these issues, Sowell and Williams expose the truth, a truth far less sinister than the race-hustlers claim.

The verdict is in. We now see the damage done by LBJ's War on Poverty, during which time the black illegitimacy rate grew from 25 percent to today's nearly 70 percent. Evidence shows the existence of a growing, thriving, black middle class well before the advent of affirmative action. Nor does history support the hysterical, emotional view that affirmative action accelerated the black middle class growth.

Sowell and Williams urge blacks to reject welfare in favor of self-help -- breaking the monopoly of public education, privatization of Social Security, and the adherence to responsible moral, personal, and sexual behavior. So who's the Uncle Tom? Those proposing the same old "solutions," or those, like Sowell and Williams, recommending real change?

Will Sowell and Williams get their apology? Hey, many pundits, present company included, felt Vice President Al Gore unlikely to use the "C" (concession) word in his speech. He did. So maybe, just maybe, we can begin a healthy, personal attack-free debate about what's right, just, and proper in America. An apology to Sowell and Williams would be an excellent start.

OK, if not an apology, how about a well-deserved round of applause?


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: thomassowelllist; walterwilliamslist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: *Thomas_Sowell_list;*Walter Williams list
Bump List
41 posted on 02/23/2002 3:25:48 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
I love to listen to Walter Williams, he KNOWS what he is talking about.
42 posted on 02/23/2002 3:31:13 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clifdo
They (the Jesse Jacksons of the world) sure do have the best interest of their people at heart, don't they?

NOT!

I have plenty of friends who happen to be black and conservative, and they all say the same thing: Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are nothing but poverty pimps, and that includes Quanell X(crement) as well.

43 posted on 02/23/2002 4:43:42 PM PST by Marauder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Faraday
What you said, and more. I have a niece (she is white) who married a black Air Force Officer. She was very liberal, he was very conservative. He got her to listen to Rush, but she had a built-in negative feeling about him and just 'tuned him out'. However, she did listen to Rush when Walter Williams was guest-host, and was just blown away at his common sense and explanation of economic issues.

She cast her first Conservative vote in 2000 - for Bush.

44 posted on 02/23/2002 5:38:55 PM PST by SmartBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Real Eddie01
Then I respectfully have to ask, why do blacks overwhelmingly vote Democrat knowing they are being hurt by their elected officials?

Because it's better than getting beaten and chained to the bumper of a pick up truck, which will happen if they vote Republican. Don't you know? Just listen to national urban radio prior to an election to find out what Republicans are up to. Tom Joyner et al

45 posted on 02/24/2002 5:36:06 AM PST by Captiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Funny as heck, too. Usually has Sowell on for an hour.
46 posted on 02/24/2002 5:38:35 AM PST by Captiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
Year old article. Already posted

Well it should be reposted at least every six months - not annually if you ask me. I know you didn't, but hey.

47 posted on 02/24/2002 5:44:29 AM PST by Captiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Captiva
Seems some got irritable with me for pointing out the repost. Aside from maybe recomending decaf to the irritable, let me clarify that my point wasn't that the thread should be deleted. I was more puzzled that the originating publication [Capitalism Magazine] didn't put the original publish date and source on the byline. It comes off as a bit deceptive - needlessly so.
48 posted on 02/24/2002 11:41:06 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson