Posted on 03/24/2002 7:10:59 PM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid
The Boy Scouts are right. There is no calling to sacred to keep gay pedophiles from their obsession. The recent revelations about Catholic priests is just another chapter in a growing body of evidence that homosexuality is not a "normal" human activity, rather it is obsessive in its victimization and recruitment of the young.
What all this means is that homophobes are justified in their fears. In fact, it is very likely that homophobia has its roots in molestation. How many young boys have had their faith in God, their trust in the scouts, their confidence in adults, shattered by a grim experience?
How many gays were coerced into the lifestyle through molestation? How many had an involuntary first sexual experience at the hands of someone they trusted? How many gays are gay only because they know no other sexual experience and fear heterosexuality?
Homophobes should feel no guilt, in fact, they should feel more vigilent, based on the most recent revelations that only add more fuel to the fire.
Heck, let's even agree to ignore the 40+ year's head-start I have on my end of the test.
Ready, steady, GO!
Your reply speaks volumes about the homosexual community and it's supporters. The facts are that supposedly "mainstream" homosexual organizations such as GLSEN and PFLAG, who tell us that their mission is simply promoting tolerance and safety in schools, are promoting pornographic materials in an ever increasing number of schools across the nation. The publisher of some of the material recommended to middle and high school-aged children is a publisher of homosexual pornography.
Wake up parents! As you've seen recently, homosexuals are the major cause of child sexual abuse in the church. They are entrenched in the church and they are entrenched in the public schools.
Baiting is not discussion.This is not a forum to debate the value of liberalism. Check previous posts. It is always the same MO.
You got that right. Homosexuals feel comfortable molesting innocents to young to understand and too weak to fight back. Homosexuals who go after little same sex children are the lowest of the low. It is easy to molest a child. Much harder to molest an adult. Worse.....those perverts often tell the children they use to achieve their orgasms off of that 'the sexual encounter could NOT have happened if the child were not homosexual to begin with'. Talk about rape---it not only breaks the trust of a little child, it may impact his ability to function as a heterosexual for the rest of his life if he buys into such horrid crap. Literally, crap.
Hehehe…How are “straight” people comparable to those who practice perversion? Since you think they are comparable then what about incest and bestiality when practiced in a committed, monogamous, consenting, age appropriate and loving private way. What they do in their own bedrooms is none-your-bidness, right? If you’re going to be a Liberaltarian you can’t pick and choose your perversion.
Yes because the pursuit of happiness is unspecific. If you can’t argue one perversion is better than an other, it’s a bit hypocritical to put one person’s pursuit of “happiness” in better standing than someone else’s.
But since the person I was responding to made a point of appealing to it explicitly, I thought it reasonable to show what follows ;-)
Sorry, I thought your argument should stand the test of consistency and hold for others scrutiny. If you want your debate private and confined to arbitrary parameters I’ll leave you alone.
So homosexual sodomy is quicker than cheesburgers so that makes the latter a lesser evil. What happened to your kindness or doesn't it apply to slower deaths.
But the most pathetic thing was your admonishion to stay on topic. The topic is that your response to this thread was fanatical, illogical, and impratcial. You seem to realize this dissonance in your position because you are trying to avoid admitting the obvious.
The homosexual lifestyle is principally about sex, and not about "stable, loving relationships which are no different from anyone else", as we are supposed to naively accept.
Homosexuals, back in the closet.
Sorry, I thought that’s what I was doing.
But just because I use their premise in a reductio on their position doesn't mean I'm endorsing it.
Gee, that’s hard to tell from your posts but I’ll take you word for it. So you agree then that the pursuit of happiness clause doesn’t prohibit “consensual homosexual sex should [can] be regulated by the state?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.