To: cva66snipe
It's none of my business, since I live in Texas, but Bryant strikes me as a real yawner when it comes to enthusiasm.
Alexander's got more name recognition than Bryant does, nationally. Is that not the case in Tennessee?
Remember, the objective's to beat the Democrats, not quibble over internecine battles.
5 posted on
03/30/2002 12:25:57 PM PST by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur;GailA
You're from Texas so you don't know Lamar like we do. You don't know about the states problems under his tenure as governor. Bank failures related to a politically endorsed failed Worlds Fair. A communications firm Lamar was tied to that after securing city help to build it's campus left town soon after completion. The sorry pathetic insterstates build under his watch. The magical family investments that would make Hillary envious. Gail can you post that Skeleton site again? Lamar was a good governor Only because the previous one was a convicted felon upon leaving office. Let me ask you Sink. If the RNC and White House had said Don Sundquist-R is the man for senate would you say we should support him also?
To: sinkspur
I agree with you, Bryant does not have the name recognition that Alexander does and he seems like a yawner. I know Lamar's not perfect but the goal is to win the Senate, not lose because we need idealogical purity.
On a side note Sinkspur, I nearly always agree with your posts.
26 posted on
03/30/2002 5:31:01 PM PST by
SoCar
To: sinkspur
Then why have a primary at all? Just to elect the so-called better candidate? We might as well let the media tell us who to pick (cf. McCain in 2000).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson