Posted on 04/13/2002 1:25:51 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:05:46 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
The West Nile virus outbreak in the U.S. and the foot & mouth disease epidemic in the UK are both prime candidates for consideration as bio-warfare.
While SI is far more rural, Jamaica Bay is there in Queens, which is full of marshes. As for for the 'skeeters, I'd call it a toss-up.
I now forget the exact date, but, shortly after 9/11, a dead crow was found in the parking lot behind my apartment house in Takoma Park, right outside D.C. The crow was tested, and found to have West Nile Virus.
5 posted on 4/13/02 4:08 AM Central by kcvl
Just one thing these idiots had better remember: Bush and company have great influence over Israel, and her response to terrorism. In the US, Christians don't take the marching orders from DC.
I remember seeing Eltingville on a list of many Staten Island WNV locations, but I don't remember the date or if it was a human case or a dead bird. The thing is you'd probably have to isolate cases that occurred at the very beginning of the outbreak to get any sort of clue as to the precise release location.
I now forget the exact date, but, shortly after 9/11, a dead crow was found in the parking lot behind my apartment house in Takoma Park, right outside D.C. The crow was tested, and found to have West Nile Virus.
It has spread quite extensively on the East Coast by now. It's clear that the origin was NYC.
Here's a map from the NY State Dept. of Health, showing WNV occurrences in 2001. This is well after the first known case (which was August, 1999), but you can still see that Staten Island appears to be the center.
I don't know that anybody would have ever interpreted the sudden appearance of WNV as a threat -- more like a curiosity. Instead, I suggest there could be two other reasons:
1. A speculation that it would be more destructive than it has been, simply because it was so obscure and there was no established immunity in the population.
2. More likely, it was an experiment -- to determine how far and how quickly it would spread. And how long it would take us to detect it. In which case, WNV may be serving as a precursor for something else.
Thus, a question: what other, more deadly, disease is spread in the same manner, via the same vectors, perhaps with similar symptoms?
I don't know that this study establishes that Northeastern Queens was necessarily the epicenter of the WNV outbreak. They focussed on NE Queens because of the incidence of human cases.
Out of the 430 birds tested, the vast majority (253) came from NE Queens. But that was a function of the distribution of their traps -- five were located in NE Queens, only one in Richmond (Staten Island). The latter accounted for 43 birds, suggesting a similar distribution of infected birds.
In any event, from your earlier map, it is clear that the source of the outbreak (attack?) was somewhere in NYC.
What do you mean?
As far as 'evidence' goes, this is fairly fresh and is certainly worthy of mention in this news story about yesterday's bail hearing.
I suggested earlier that this was just part of the spreading out from the introduction in NYC, but look at the following quote from a NewsMax article, West Nile Virus: I Still Do Not Believe in Coincidences:
By this week [the article is dated 9/25/2000] it has been reported that in parts of New York City, the Maryland suburbs surrounding Washington, D.C., the mid-coastal region of Israel and the southern Saudi coastal areas have all seen a precipitous rise of the incidents of West Nile Fever. Israel even calls it an epidemic.I haven't checked into the evidence for this yet, but the author is suggesting that Iraq introduced West Nile virus into four different areas: NYC, Washington DC, Israel, and Saudi Arabia.
I don't think that's the reason; mortality is very low, so it's not an effective threat. I suspect that it may have been a test or experiment.
There was apparently a book published in 1999, just months before the NYC outbreak, by an Iraqi defector; in it, he claimed that Saddam Hussein was preparing to release a modified form of West Nile virus with a 97% fatality rate. Notwithstanding the incorrect fatality rate, it seems like quite a coincidence: that somebody would say that a release of WNV as a bioweapon was in the works, just a few months before an actual outbreak. (I've done searches, and West Nile virus was not commonly in the news or otherwise referred to, until the NYC outbreak.)
One guess would be that the bioengineering effort failed, but that Saddam Hussein decided to proceed with an experiment anyway. WNV is a good choice for a test; it had never occurred in the Western Hemisphere before, so he could try a particular method of release and track its spread, with no possibility of confusion with native viruses.
Biowarfare is new. I'm sure Saddam Hussein would want to carry out some experiments before a full-fledged attack, to learn how to use this new method of warfare effectively.
That's what I thought at first. But there are three pieces of evidence suggesting that Queens was, in fact, the origin (these are all from the CDC article I mentioned in an earlier post):
The West Nile virus outbreak is often described as being centered in northern Queens, but when you look at human infections, mosquito pools, dead birds, etc., it looks like it's really centered on Staten Island. (It's hard to say where it started; I think Staten Island is more rural, so there's probably more standing water there for mosquitos to breed in.) I wonder if this Sattar or someone associated with him has a connection with this?
Betty Jo's been researching the bin Laden biolabs/healthcare network--maybe she's come across something to help...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.