Pedophile science

Washington Times ^ | May 4, 2002 | Steve Baldwin

[FormerLib]

Even as the nation's largest religious denomination is rocked by the scandal of pedophile priests, Judith Levine, in her book "Harmful to Minors," is making excuses for pedophilia. This is hardly a coincidence. Academic Judith Reisman, author of "Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences," says pro-pedophile "sexperts" such as those lionized in Miss Levine's book have counseled the Roman Catholic Church and other denominations for at least two decades about the harmlessness of pedophilia.

[FormerLib]

Mrs. Reisman recieves a lot of criticism for her stands against the pedophile and homosexual agendas. But, if it weren't for here, who else would be pointing out the true perversion that lurks beneath the Kinsey 'research?'

[FormerLib]

ping

[supercat]

Pædophilia advocates like to point out that it used to be common for children 14 years old and sometimes younger to get married (and thus have sex). What they fail to mention is that any proposed spouse (and thus sex partner) for a child would be very carefully vetted by that child's parents. Children were not believed to be old enough to look out for themselves then; it was expected that their parents would look out for them.

I know a number of states allow children as young as 14 to get married with parental consent. On the other hand, how many states allow children under 18 to get married without parental consent (or, at minimum, a very severe vetting by a judge in an emancipation hearing)?

[marktwain]

I know a number of states allow children as young as 14 to get married with parental consent. On the other hand, how many states allow children under 18 to get married without parental consent (or, at minimum, a very severe vetting by a judge in an emancipation hearing)?

You are close to the core here. There is no question that children are sexual beings from a very early age. Most parents have probably had to confront the reality of their young children masturbating.

The question is not child sexuality. It is child responsibility. Children are sexual, but children are not responsible. The parent is responsible, and the results of child sexuality in unwanted pregnancys, potential disearse, exploitation, and emotional problems that children are just not ready to deal with, but the parent will have to, are a very real justification for parental contol over their children. Once a child is emancipated, then they are responsible for themselves, and they should be able to control their own bodies.

[Odyssey-x]

Every goddam night I turn on the news and there is something on about some underage person being molested, or raping another underage person, etc, etc. There are plenty of terrible crimes that go on everyday, why broadcast stories about these ones almost everyday? Are they doing it for ratings? Are they doing it to make us think everybody does it?

[Clint N. Suhks]

Kinsey concluded the children enjoyed the experience.

Kinsey was a self-serving homosexual researcher much like the APA, is it any wonder why his findings and the APA’s are pro-perversion? Outcome based research is the norm for those who justify the disordered practice of perversion.

[ThinkLikeWaterAndReeds]

Isn't Levine the one who is constantly chased away from jr. high school gym class instruction

[EdReform]

Bump!