Skip to comments.
Bush backs right to bear arms
newsmax
| 5/7/02
Posted on 05/07/2002 5:44:52 PM PDT by JDoutrider
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 last
To: Terriergal
Exactly which firearms are NOT suited to criminal misuse? These maybe?
81
posted on
05/08/2002 6:57:57 AM PDT
by
mc5cents
To: mc5cents
Oh yeah those. Very good! But see you still probably pistol whip someone with those...
To: JFoxbear
Well said........Stay Safe !
83
posted on
05/08/2002 9:44:19 AM PDT
by
Squantos
To: rwfromkansas
idiot I am so chagrinned by the devastating wit and scintillating scholarship of your response. But you left out things like 'doody face' and 'nyah-nyah'. Maybe when your mommy wakes you up from your milk and graham cracker nappy, you'll be able to follow up with something equally germane.
84
posted on
05/08/2002 9:52:35 AM PDT
by
Noumenon
To: JDoutrider
Does anyone have a link to the official statement and/or any other very recent related materials? I'd like more facts on what was actually presented to SCOTUS on this.
To: ctdonath2
As far as I can tell, the brief is not available online yet. I'm guessing that saf.org will probably post it eventually...soon, I hope.
86
posted on
05/08/2002 12:18:00 PM PDT
by
Sandy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson