Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Daily Threat
Lew Rockwell ^ | 5/27/02 | Jeff Elkins

Posted on 05/27/2002 6:39:11 AM PDT by TEXICAN II

So now we have to be on the lookout for skin-diving Arabs, traveling on Amtrak trains or Trailways buses, wearing plastique wet suits no doubt; perhaps even with suitcase nukes in tow.

"Recent information has determined that various terrorist elements have sought to develop an offensive scuba diver capability, While there is no evidence of operational planning to utilize scuba divers to carry out attacks within the United States, there is a body of information showing the desire to obtain such capability," the FBI said in an information bulletin issued by its National Infrastructure Protection Center.

An FBI spokesman said the scuba diver alert was based on "uncorroborated information...We are sharing this information out of an abundance of caution. It is nothing to get panicked about."

The scuba diver warning came a day after Norman Mineta's U.S. Transportation Department warned of possible attacks on rail and transit systems across the country, again based on unconfirmed information. Prior to that, the FBI warned of possible strikes against landmarks in New York, including the Statue of Liberty and Brooklyn Bridge.

On Meet the Press and Fox News, Vice President Dick Cheney warned that extremists could launch fresh attacks. "It's not a matter of if but when," he said. "We don't know if it's going to be tomorrow or next week or next year, partly because we're having some success in disrupting the organization and making it more difficult for them to carry out their operations."

FBI Director Robert Mueller also says another attack is inevitable, probably from Palestinian-style suicide bombers. "I think we will see that in the future, I think it's inevitable. I wish I could be more optimistic," he said.

Cheney agrees. He sees "a real possibility" that suicide bombers may attack the United States. "Terrorism is an evil, pernicious thing, and it is one of the biggest challenges we've ever faced as a nation," says Cheney .

Plastique vests, suitcase nukes and skin-diving enemy agents. al-Qaida is sounding more and more like SPECTRE every day. Any time now, I expect to read a report that Ernst Blofeld is the real mastermind behind bin Laden. Where's James Bond when you need him?

Of course, this flood of unsubstantiated executive branch fear-mongering is occurring after Bush was excoriated for having advance knowledge of terrorist plots and not being sufficiently forthcoming with public warnings. Heaven forbid, these latest warnings couldn't be political in nature could they?

Of course they are.

A state of continual low-level panic is just what the bureaucrats of DC want to achieve. It's the perfect partner to war fever, keeping things stirred up on the home front so they can pass new laws further shredding our liberty. In addition to politically covering their collective (and collectivist) rear ends when the next preordained event does occur, the continual low-level panic they are attempting to induce provides the perfect environment for further centralization of power into their grubby, blood-stained hands.

If they did want to prevent terrorism, the simple step of allowing pilots to pack heat would alleviate most hijacking fears. God forbid that an airline pilot have a pistol. Shooting down an airliner with a heat-seeking missile launched from an F16 is much more logical. Besides, according to Tom Ridge, if you let pilots carry a gun, why next, the bus drivers will want one. Horrors!

Besides, if we armed our pilots we wouldn't need 30,000 new federal employees dedicated to strip-searching grandmothers, copping feels from teenage girls and taking nude photos of everyone else.

If the government did want to prevent terrorism, they would repeal the unconstitutional laws infringing on the 2nd Amendment. Not just for pilots, but for everyone.

If the government did want to prevent terrorism, they wouldn't allow any and all entry through our borders, even armed Mexican military units, reportedly escorting drug shipments.

If the government did want to prevent terrorism, they wouldn't continue to implement a foreign policy that guarantees that millions world-wide look on America, not as a beacon of freedom, but as an oppressive superpower, ready to bomb and starve innocents at any time.

Preventing terrorism is the last thing they want, because it's actually a useful tool for consolidating state power.

That's why we're hearing the daily threat from DC.

May 27, 2002

Jeff Elkins [send him mail] is a freelance writer and the editor of Elkins.org, a free online webzine and discussion forum.

Copyright © 2002 LewRockwell.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: homelandsecurity; terror; terrorwarnings; threatlevel

1 posted on 05/27/2002 6:39:11 AM PDT by TEXICAN II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TEXICAN II
Let's not racially profile though. It's not the grandmothers, teenaged girls and medal of honor winners who the Gummit is warning about. It's ARABS! But we don't want to be insensitive though. And it would be soooo uncivilized.
2 posted on 05/27/2002 6:44:45 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
If they did want to prevent terrorism, the simple step of allowing pilots to pack heat would alleviate most hijacking fears. God forbid that an airline pilot have a pistol.

God forbid, too, that a wayward shot from a pilot could puncture a hole in the fuselage ceiling. My stepfather pointed that out in a conversation on this topic the other night.

foreverfree

3 posted on 05/27/2002 8:54:37 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree
"God forbid, too, that a wayward shot from a pilot could puncture a hole in the fuselage ceiling"

I must not have paying any attention, but tell me again how many crashes have been caused, how many lives have been lost, and how many buildings have been leveled as a result of a wayward shot? And we are at war in which nation because of a wayward shot?

4 posted on 05/27/2002 12:49:15 PM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree
God forbid, too, that a wayward shot from a pilot could puncture a hole in the fuselage ceiling.

True. But when would this happen? Only when a pilot draws a gun. When would the pilot draw his gun?

When the plane is in danger of being hijacked!

So, is it better to let the plane be hijacked (and used as a guided missile) than to risk the one-in-a-thousand chance of a wayward shot puncturing the ceiling and bringing the plane down? But if the hijacker is planning to bring the plane down anyway, into a building, then what is the down side of having it crash at a random place - probably unpopulated - anyway?

I just don't understand the obstinate objections to letting pilots carry guns. The logic and scare stories just don't hold up and it seems like grasping at straws to me. What can I say.

5 posted on 05/27/2002 1:14:34 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank
I just don't understand the obstinate objections to letting pilots carry guns. The logic and scare stories just don't hold up and it seems like grasping at straws to me. What can I say.

Neither do I. I say arm the pilots.

BTW my "God forbid" remark in post #3 was meant to be sarcastic. I forgot the sarcasm tag.

My stepdad really did, however, point out the risk in puncturing the fuselage.

foreverfree

6 posted on 05/27/2002 6:39:36 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree
I've read several threads on FR debunking "explosive decompression". You might want to do a Google search on the subject.
7 posted on 05/27/2002 7:58:50 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson