Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Memo: FBI Destroyed Evidence in Bin Laden Case After Glitch With E-Mail Surveillance System
AP ^ | May 28, 2002 | D. Ian Hopper

Posted on 05/28/2002 3:33:33 PM PDT by jpthomas

WASHINGTON (AP) - The FBI destroyed evidence gathered in an investigation involving Osama bin Laden's network after its e-mail wiretap system mistakenly captured information to which the agency was not entitled.

The FBI software not only picked up the e-mails of its target "but also picked up e-mails on non-covered targets," said a March 2000 memo to agency headquarters in Washington.

"The FBI technical person was apparently so upset that he destroyed all the e-mail take, including the take on" the suspect, the memo said.

The documents were made public through a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a Washington advocacy group. The material was not included in an original release but became public after a federal judge ordered the bureau to give out more documents.

At issue was an investigation in Denver in which the FBI's bin Laden unit was using the bureau's Carnivore system to conduct electronic surveillance of a suspect under a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant. The suspect's name and other information identifying details of the investigation were marked out of the letter.

The memo surfaced as the FBI was addressing concerns it mishandled aspects of terrorism investigation prior to the Sept. 11 attacks. Those concerns include a warning from its Phoenix office about Arab pilots training in the United States last July.

FBI officials declined Tuesday to discuss the memo or the investigation it referred to. They did, however, say that the bin Laden unit at FBI headquarters handles only investigations involving suspected activity by his terror network.

The memo shows FBI agents were worried about the fallout in the Denver case.

The Justice Department's Office of Intelligence and Policy Review was furious after learning the evidence captured by the e-mail wiretap system was destroyed because of the glitch, the memo states.

"To state that she was unhappy at ITOS (International Terrorism Operations Center) and the UBL (bin Laden) unit is an understatement," the memo stated, quoting a Justice official.

The memo said Justice officials worried the destruction of the evidence would signal an "inability on the part of the FBI to manage" the warrants that are key tools in espionage and antiterrorism cases.

Privacy groups and some members of Congress have complained that Carnivore had the potential to collect more information than allowed by a warrant.

"Here's confirmation of the fact that not only did it do that, but it resulted in a loss of legitimately acquired intelligence," said David Sobel, general counsel of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the group that sued to get the documents.

The e-mail from an unnamed author to M.E. "Spike" Bowman, the FBI's associate general counsel for national security, said Denver agents installed the e-mail surveillance system in March 16, 2000, but the device did not work correctly.

The technician who deleted the e-mail evidence had no supervision, the memo added.

Henry H. Perritt, who led a team authorized by the FBI to review the surveillance system, said he was surprised the technician deleted the e-mails.

"The collection is supposed to be retained for judicial review," Perritt said. "If an agent simply deleted a whole bunch of files without the court instructing, that's not the way it's supposed to work."

Another document released through the privacy group's request explains the bureau's policy for overcollection on a surveillance warrant. The memo, dated just a week after the Denver e-mail, says the e-mails should be kept under seal so that senior FBI officials can figure out how the wiretap went wrong.

The unintended targets of the FBI's snooping may have deserved notification that the mistake was made, the FBI memo said.

Authorities have used Carnivore-type tools more than 25 times in all types of criminal cases, to catch fugitives, drug dealers, extortionists and suspected foreign intelligence agents. Carnivore is now called DCS-1000.

Perritt's review panel recommended that the FBI change Carnivore so that it is more difficult to accidentally collect too much information. The FBI has not announced any changes.

---

On the Net:

Electronic Privacy Information Center:

http://www.epic.org

FBI: http://www.fbi.gov

AP-ES-05-28-02 1707EDT


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abledanger; antiterrorism; binladen; bushknew; carnivore; coverup; datamining; emails; espionagelist; fbi; gorelick; gorelickwall; incompetence; itos; privacylist; terrorwar; ubl; whitewash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2002 3:33:33 PM PDT by jpthomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jpthomas
I'd rather they destroyed them all than kept them all. It's as if they accidentally opened and copied everything sent in the US Mail. If I'm not a suspect, and there's no warrant, the government has no right to look at my email.

It is unfortunate that terrorist emails were also destroyed, but they are inept, obviously.

2 posted on 05/28/2002 3:44:34 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpthomas
a March 2000 memo

Just for the record.

3 posted on 05/28/2002 3:51:22 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *TerrorWar;*Espionage_list;*privacy_list
*Index Bump
4 posted on 05/28/2002 4:01:03 PM PDT by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpthomas; eroteme; fred mertz
Comedy of errors, or deliberate?

Anybody remember what was going on with the missing White House e-mails at this time, March 2000?

5 posted on 05/28/2002 4:04:42 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Anybody remember what was going on with the missing White House e-mails at this time, March 2000?

That the first thing I thought, too. Probably no connection -but it's an interesting coincidence, nonetheless.

6 posted on 05/28/2002 4:39:26 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Good eye. It was precisely March 2000 when the White House email story was breaking wide open.

So why would someone at the FBI panic enough to destroy all info, including legit surveillance on bin Laden associates?

Possibilities: 1) The person(s) whose e-mail was illegally captured was well known and powerful, or 2)the rapidly escalating White House e-mail situation served as a heads-up to create, in advance, reasonable explanation for a trove of missing data;

...or 3)as an extension of possibility #1, e-mails captured by this bin Laden unit may have mirrored one or more of the supposedly irretrievable White House e-mails.

7 posted on 05/28/2002 4:43:15 PM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eroteme
and by choice the FBI deletes stuff?
8 posted on 05/28/2002 4:46:14 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eroteme
I was thinking of your (3).
9 posted on 05/28/2002 4:46:46 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jpthomas
The FBI technical person was apparently so upset that he destroyed all the e-mail take
Yeah that's a good one. The FBI's version of "the dog ate my homework"
10 posted on 05/28/2002 4:49:00 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eroteme
...or 3)as an extension of possibility #1, e-mails captured by this bin Laden unit may have mirrored one or more of the supposedly irretrievable White House e-mails.

Well it could be very possible

BTW .. weren't those emails suppose to have been recovered?? .. what ever happen with that???

11 posted on 05/28/2002 4:50:29 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jpthomas
More legacy for the evil ones and their evil piglet.
12 posted on 05/28/2002 4:53:56 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Oh, goody! Another "glitch" concerning e-mail! Another "snafu!" Another lame attempt to say that a "technical glitch" has destroyed evidence.

Sounds hauntingly familiar, doesn't it?

And I believe this crap like I believe that space aliens invented sliced bread.

13 posted on 05/28/2002 4:55:13 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eroteme
You forgot possibility number four.

That the FBI itself was implicated by the e-mails that were destroyed by a "glitch" or "snafu."

14 posted on 05/28/2002 4:57:33 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jpthomas
Yet more "leaks" of the Clinton defense that it all was a "SNAFU".
15 posted on 05/28/2002 5:00:41 PM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
right
16 posted on 05/28/2002 5:01:03 PM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
>>> Anybody remember what was going on with the missing White House e-mails at this time, March 2000? <<<

This was from September 2000, but has some relevance possibly: Secret off-site e-mail tape depot revealed

17 posted on 05/28/2002 5:08:05 PM PDT by OwenKellogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Paging Judge Lamberth, paging Judge Royce Lamberth.
18 posted on 05/28/2002 5:11:56 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aristeides;all
Just FYI--


WEB RESULTS   (Showing Results 1 - 28 of 38 Matches )    next »
Get the Top 10 websites for "White House email "

2.  JUDGE ORDERS WHITE HOUSE TO SPEED UP EVIDENCE PRODUCTION [Free Republic]
FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum" [ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ] Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are th

3.  White House Computer System Blamed [Free Republic]
FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum" [ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ] Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are th

4.  White House Hid 100,000 Incriminating Emails From Prosecutors [Free Republic]
FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum" [ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ] Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are th

5.  Independent counsel says White House lawyers buried key evidence in impeachment case [Free Republic]
FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum" [ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ] Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are th

6.  E-mail probe gets delayed - Barr: Justice 'hiding the truth,''opening a sham investigation' [Free Republic]
FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum" [ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ] Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are th

19 posted on 05/28/2002 5:13:26 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jpthomas
Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse....Jayzus...
20 posted on 05/28/2002 6:09:06 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson