Posted on 06/02/2002 10:09:59 AM PDT by joesnuffy
Attorney General John Ashcroft responded Sunday to the Wall Street Journal's call two days ago for the resignation of FBI Director Robert Mueller, saying the embattled bureau chief is doing a good job.
"Bob Mueller is a battle-tested veteran," Ashcroft told "Fox News Sunday's" Brit Hume.
"He was shot in the line of duty in Vietnam. [He's] got all kinds of - he knows how to operate under fire."
Ashcroft said Mueller is "renovating the FBI in very significant ways to refocus that institution with prevention as its priority, preventing war. And he's doing a good job."
The FBI chief has "totally reconstructed the [FBI's] counter-terrorism unit" and fired "about 25 percent of the bureau's leadership held over from the Clinton administration," Ashcroft said, adding, "These things are already done."
The Justice Department chief said that last week's announcement that the FBI would seek expanded surveillance powers was the second stage of the bureau's restructuring, which was, he said, "designed to help us do what the American people really want us to do and what we need to do. And that's to focus on preventing additional terrorist attacks."
Do they have enough broom closets into which they can kick the appropriate career people sideways?
The big thing that the WSJ and other left wing maggot editors are not telling the American people about Mr. Mueller is a simple fact!
Mr. Mueller was sworn in as Director of the FBI on 4 September 2001. That was 7 days before 9/11.
What the Al Hunt scumbags who control the fishwraps are trying to do is simple.
They don't want the reality of what the Clintoon and Jake Reno did re 9/11 and their flunky FBI director, Louisa Freeh to be realized by the American public. So they are trying to electronically lynch Mueller who was on the job 7 days before 9/11. They are incredible scum bags who would destroy America if we ignore them.
Thanks to Guido for posting this data re Mr Mueller NOT BEING SWORN IN AS FBI DIRECTOR UNTIL 9/4/2001.
Me too!!!
And Mueller himself was imressive on "Meet the Press" this morning.
Could the Wall Street Journal have been wrong in its editorial against Mueller this week?
September 4, 2001 Calls for his head on a platter are ridiculous. The guy had been on the job a WEEK when 9/11 hit. Plenty of blame can be put at the feet of Clinton/Reno/Freeh but who cares at this point? Let's just get the job done.
... The Justice Department chief said that last week's announcement that the FBI would seek expanded surveillance powers was the second stage of the bureau's restructuring, which was, he said, "designed to help us do what the American people really want us to do and what we need to do. And that's to focus on preventing additional terrorist attacks" ...A broken organization wants greater power? What was it that prevented the bureau from pursuing its leads prior to 9.11.? It wasn't lack of authority to surveill, was it? Wasn't it was obstruction from above?
Yeah, and I recall reading that Clinton made a lot of DOJ positions that were once political appointments into federal union jobs, so they can't be fired. I think he might have even done this with the US Attorneys, though I could be mistaken on that point.
It'll take a long time to fumigate Justice, but specially-assigned offices with 15w light bulbs, no phone lines, and broken, empty desks would help.
ps. Not stalking you today, honest...
I happened across this thread and thought I'd post in agreement with you on something.
All the 20/20 hindsight wonders in the media, are nothing but knee jerk reactionaries and rush to judgment misfits, who are good at pointing fingers and bashing government officials, but not much else. (Come to think of it, theres a quite of few of those types, right here on FreeRepublic.) I don't remember anyone in the media, coming out and declaring an attack on the WTC was imminent. The media doesn't know anymore then the feds did. Face it, this was a well planned and executed attack by Bin Laden and his Al Qaeida forces.
All this connect the dots rhetoric, is just that, nothing but bold talk crappola, after the act has occured and after the facts are known.
As for cleaning out all the Clinton appointees, that's easier said then done. Especially, when one considers the facts. The last full two term Democrat POTUS, before 'der schlickmeister', was FDR. Eight years is an eternity in Washington-DC politics. Patients is a virtue. The bad eggs will be moved out asap. I trust Ashcroft and if he says, Mueller can get the job done, thats good enough for me. Besides, if there is another terrorist attack like 9-11, all hell is gonna break loose, no matter whose in charge.
Has he sacked 25% of the Bureau's leadership or merely sacked 1 out of every 4 Clinton holdovers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.