Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.


Skip to comments.

[Locked-flamewar] MUBARAK CLAIMS: EGYPT WARNED U.S. OF AN AL-QAIDA PLOT WEEK BEFORE 9/11
Drudge Report ^ | 6/3/2002 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 06/03/2002 7:59:52 PM PDT by DrLiberty

Egyptian intelligence warned American officials about a week before Sept. 11 that Osama bin Laden's network was in the advance stages of executing a significant operation against an American target, it will be reported on Tuesday (in the NY TIMES)... MORE... A senior U.S. intelligence official denied the warning was received...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1979; 1981; 2001; 200103; 200105; 200107; 200109; 20010911; 200206; 911; afghanistan; airlinesecurity; airplane; anwarelsadat; anwarsadat; arafat; binladen; cairo; carter; corruption; deception; egypt; embassies; embassyplots; foreshadowing; genoa; intelfailures; italy; jimmycarter; jordan; libya; lies; mubarak; mujahadeen; mujahedeen; omarsuleiman; priorknowledge; sadat; sudan; suleiman; terrorism; usembassyegypt; warnings; yasirarafat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-244 next last
To: Iwentsouth
If you have purchased any Marzipan from any source in the last 10 years you have engaged in a business dealing with Osama Bin Laden.

Golly, gee, that probably includes every prime minister of Israel, among others, and even the closest relatives of the folks killed at the WTC.

Osama did not manufacture marzipan. Rather, he became the major broker for Yemeni honey in the world. Besides inheriting billions from his very wealthy father, and ripping off Arab contributions to the Afghans in their war against the Russians, Osama also became the world's foremost honey broker. That honey ended up in the marzipan.

141 posted on 06/03/2002 9:00:01 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
Using a secret agent they had recruited who was in close contact with the bin Laden organization, Mr. Mubarak said, his intelligence chiefs tried unsuccessfully to halt the operation. </I.

Sounds like Egypt's got a serious spy agency; shame WE don't...

142 posted on 06/03/2002 9:00:30 PM PDT by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Actually the Bush family has two major contacts witht he Saudis. One is with a Saudi prince named Prince Alwaleed bin Talal (who by the way is the biggest international investor in the United States, and an extremely wealthy man who took his inherited millions and turned them into $17.2 billion through shrewd investments. He owns a myriad of tech stocks, and many of the big hotels around NYC are at least owned partially by him. He also owns part of News Corp. and a piece of the Dodgers. He also owns a huge portion of Disney, and is a primary holder of up to $2 billion of Apple, Motorolla, AOL and Teledesic). The Bush family have had severla joint ventures with Prince Talal. However the juicest connection is the following.

The Bush family is a major investor/board member/power broker (especially Bush senior) of the Carlyle group, whihc is a member defence contractor for the US military. For example the Crusader advanced artillery system was being backed by them. However one of the major members of the group is the Binladin family. The Binladin family is the family unit that Usama bin Laden belongs to. They changed their name to Binladin to avoid 'negative' associations with their 'acerbic' relative. And due to their immense wealth stemming from the patriach of the family (now deceased) getting into lucrative architecture and building contracts with the former monarchs of Saudi Arabia, they have quite some clout in the Carlyle group.

Now, i want to pint out here i am not saying that these liaisons between the Bushs' and both the Prince, and the Binladin family, are nefarious or evil. I am not saying they are wrong.... it looks that they are just some clever business stratagems.

The reason i posted this is to reply a post you sent to a fellow Freeper that i felt was kind of intimidatory, and thus i had to stand up for my fellow Freeper and post the facts above. The Bush family is in cahoots with a lot of Saudi principals... and it is in a myriad of business investments ranging from investment hedging to military procurements for the US military.

And i know in the next hour or so i will receive several posts 'hotly' demanding 'credence' for my assertions in the form of 'proof.' So my sources are as follows: The Prince Alwaleed bin Talal connection was from Fortune magazine for December 6, 1999. And the Bush connection to the Binladin family was from a C-Span interview with the Carlyle group where they had to disclose the major members of the group, and Bush Sr, was there, as was the binladins and some former members of the government eg Kissinger et al.

And again i emphasize that there is necessarily nothing nefarious about the connections.... i am just defending a fellow Freeper.

Enjoy.

143 posted on 06/03/2002 9:00:49 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
Yes, we were asleep at the wheel, doesn’t everyone know this? We were all too interested in our portfolios to see what was coming, it has happened before.

During WWII the same thing happened. We (us and the Brits) were reading most of the Ultra/Magic summaries; it took over a year to get it organized to where they were useful. Were the signs there, of course, but you have to be looking to see them.

What concerns me more is the fact that the problems are not fixed, business as usual at the FBI/CIA, no plan for probability profiling, a totally out of control INS, airport security a disaster, no one fired at the FBI, etc. Unfortunately it will take another before we get serious about these guys, at least on the home front.

144 posted on 06/03/2002 9:00:58 PM PDT by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
True citizens WANT THE TRUTH!

They QUESTION THEIR GOVERNMENT!

They DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING AN AMERICAN OFFICIAL SAYS!

they also AREN'T AFRAID TO ACCUSE LEADERS OF CRIMES, INCLUDING TREASON!

Last, but not least, they aren't afraid of bullies who would dare question their patriotism!

That is all well and good, but this finger-pointing is just another part of the "Somehow WE are responsible" garbage. Question and accuse all you want, but be aware that you appear to be blaming *us* more than the people who actually did this.

I recall a question asked of an old soldier (written up in Col. Jeff Cooper's commentaries, perhaps). A young person asked a retired soldier if he had killed many of the enemy. The old soldier said that yes, he had. The young person then asked: "Did you find it an easy thing to do, to kill those men?", to which the old man answered: "No, not always. Sometimes they hid behind rocks and trees and such..."
The point is, the ragheads carried out what was to them a major COVERT UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE military operation against us. Even when you know when and where an attack is coming, you cannot always stop or turn aside that attack - that is an undeniable fact. Sometimes they get lucky and hurt you - that is part of the "Fortunes of War". The early comparisons of 9/11 with the attack on Pearl Harbor were quite accurate. This latest round of self-flagellation, by comparison, is misdirected and distracting.

We got caught with our britches down, plain and simple. Now that we are aware of certain failings in the ways in which we do things, we should use that knowledge to adapt, rethink and move forward to KILL THE ENEMY.
If we fail to correct our weaknesses and more lives are taken by these vermin, THEN we can start talking about treason.

145 posted on 06/03/2002 9:01:12 PM PDT by Cloud William
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Really? When was the last time Radical Right-Wing Christians hacked the head off a reporter?
146 posted on 06/03/2002 9:01:21 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy
wasn't it just last week that Dashle came out and said that he also knew about attacks? Suddenly, all these people "knew".........eight months after the fact. Right.
147 posted on 06/03/2002 9:01:48 PM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Iwentsouth
If those who practice Islam find peace in it, then to them, it does mean peace. This is about stereotyping a group of people based on the idiocy of the fanatical few. If you label muslims, then you'd better be prepared to label Chrisitans, Catholics, Jews, etc. In other words, get away from the stereotypes.
148 posted on 06/03/2002 9:02:04 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
Please tell me you're old enough to remember David Steinberg saying that to Burt Reynolds.......LOL.
149 posted on 06/03/2002 9:02:18 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Iwentsouth
"George Bush says "Islam means peace"."

And what would you have the President of the United States do...incite a religious/race war within our own borders? This is what good LEADERS do; they lead from a positive perspective. Remember Ronald Reagan's optimism?

150 posted on 06/03/2002 9:03:29 PM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Hello, I must be going.I cannot stay. I came to say, I must be going.

Nighty night. ;^)

151 posted on 06/03/2002 9:04:11 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
See my post. # 143.
152 posted on 06/03/2002 9:04:29 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
You are comparing apples to oranges. In any religion, there are fanaticals. But saying that ALL of a various religion act or will act in the exact same way is not even rational.
153 posted on 06/03/2002 9:04:36 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
I know all that. So you, too, are saying that if I invest in, say, a movie, I can say I'm "doing business" with Tom Clancy?
154 posted on 06/03/2002 9:05:51 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"And add the one it posted about NO PLANES being scrambled from Langley"

IT posted? Or so the dehumanizing of your opponents is now complete?

Check it out. I never said planes weren't scrambled from Langley. I said there were planes at ANDREWS AFB and they could have been scrambled, but they weren't. WHY NOT?

Oh, I forgot. Some General said they weren't ready that day? Not ready to protect the Seat of Government? What?

OH YEAH? THEN WHY THE F&*** NOT?!!!

Generals would never steer us wrong. They're on our side. They wouldn't dare pledge allegiance to say, the UN, would they?

What happened to the spirit of America? We're supposed to be better than a bunch of sniveling bureaucratic boogaloo.

155 posted on 06/03/2002 9:06:01 PM PDT by DrLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
You don't know what you're talking about.
156 posted on 06/03/2002 9:07:10 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: DrLiberty
Oh really? What about the American businessman, who visited Cairo a week before and was told THE WHOLE THING EXACTLY AS IT HAPPENED, EVEN TO AVOID LOGAN AIRPORT IN SEPT AND OCT!

Whats the businessman's name? Have you seen his ticket or hotel receipts? Did he give a deposition and have his story written down before it happened or only after? Funny he should know something that some of the hijackers didnt know (i.e, that it was a suicide mission). Some people are so gullible its pathetic.

157 posted on 06/03/2002 9:09:48 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
On a local conservative radio talk show, they had some idiot from a local "peace" group that claimed that he had proof that , get this, all four airliners were under remote control by GWB. The nut got creamed by the callers.
158 posted on 06/03/2002 9:10:09 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
Well, they should at least put an anti-aircraft gun on top of the Empire State Building.
159 posted on 06/03/2002 9:10:18 PM PDT by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
You've got a lot of nerve, asking for facts and questioning DrLibery's version.
160 posted on 06/03/2002 9:13:23 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-244 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson