Feedback from fellow Freepers indicated that the FR booth was very successful. We were in the most active aisle in the exhibit, and booths adjacent to ours were very happy to be next to us. We had the Democrat seal with the crying baby from Election 2000, and that was the most popular image in our booth (and among the most popular of all exhibits).
I have some pictures, but since I use a camera from the 1970's, it will be a few days before they get posted. In the meantime, I will link the original thread for pictures posted.
I will also provide a link when available for the "Report of the Permanent Rules & Order of Business Committee" and the "Report of the Permanent Platform & Resolutions Committee".
Isn't it great - meeting FReepers in living color?? And you're right... Our FR booth is BEAUTIFUL and very professional looking. It's a magnet for delegates.
Hey. . . that would be a GREAT name for a band!
Manning the FR booth is real treat to do...I helped with it in Dallas last summer at the NFRA convention and really enjoyed it.
It's my impression that many of the delegates seriously want to turn American into a theocracy and don't want anyone to disagree with that.
Freep mail me and I will tell you where you can help!
While a delegate to the Texas convention, I became even more frustrated with our leadership's attitudes towards the Conservative base.
The centralization of power in the state chairman rather than decentralization to the more-apt-to-be-Conservative SRECs.
Rick Perry, in his speech, rolled out more socialist programs without even taking a breath than any Republican in the history of Texas.
And after working very hard on platform issues at all three levels (precinct, senatorial, and state), it was insulting to find that our state leadership (Weddington and Barton) want us to line up and support Republican candidates come hell or high water..... (thanks for all you do)......but will not require our candidates to endorse our Conservative platform.
It is beginning to appear to me that the Republican party no longer is contributing much to the conservative versus liberal debate.
Rather, I see that our leadership at the national and local levels hungers for the power resulting from a victory in November far more than it cares about the core principles of our party.
I will vote for the candidates in November. But it will be hard to generate much enthusiasm to work for them in the meantime.
On this my second state convention, I was just a bit more involved as the Sergeant at Arms for Senate District 12.
Imagine my disappointment at learning I would not actually be permitted to bear "Arms"!
So that was you! Good job, and thanks for shortening the convention a good bit.
If the convention chairwoman had had a corner of a clue, she'd have suggested this herself.
She certainy isn't in the same league, leadership wise, as Michael Williams who chaired the Houston convention in '00.
1)Getting rid of the state lottery - It's great and all, and I support that, *BUT* unless you provide a real solution to making up that revenue, that doesn't involve new taxes, there is no point. This also plays into the state income tax crowd
2)Getting rid of bilingual education : Sounds great, english only, etc. but just in the Austin area alone, we have a 100,000 people that can't speak english. If the kids of those 100,000 people in my area (and I know it's much much higher in south Texas and the Houston area) don't have a good way of learning english, they'll not make it through school, and will end up dropping out and end up getting on some sort of public assistance, which means my taxes will go up in some way, shape, or form.
Yeah, yeah, I'm cold-hearted and care only about keeping my taxes down. I support much of what the platform calls for, but some of these planks were either crafted with no thought in the end-results, or the people crafting them aren't from Texas, or haven't lived here long and are from the north.
Putting aside results/solutions, let's look at elections. A part of the Texas GOP really seemed anti-Hispanic. Those people could hurt Conservatives in Texas for years to come. Yeah, I'm being cold-hearted and just seeing Hispanics as numbers at the polls now, but let's face it - GWB was able to win, in part, to wooing Hispanic voters. Maybe they weren't that large of a chunk of voters, but they helped. If those Hispanics that share the same Conservative/religious values that the rest of us share, feel like we see no place for them on the right side, they'll vote for the dems, and that just means more votes will have to be made up elsewhere, and that will especially impact local districts.
Sorry for rambling. It just took us so long to get GOPs/Conservatives in power in Texas, and I don't want it discarded because of a few people or groups of people.
I asked her if she noticed the FreeRepublic.com booth and she said everytime she passed by the booth there were always people there. Both visiting the booth and being staffed by Freepers.
THUMBS UP!