Levy and the Luray lemmings: Paul Sperry finds Condit's detractors engaged in reckless speculation

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Monday, June 17, 2002 | Paul Sperry

[Plummz]

I posted the pics of the weird shed at the McDonald's, I never contacted Sperry.

I never speculated the shed had anything to do with Condit, I just found it odd.

Almost as odd as the Dukes of Hazzard convention I encountered at Cooter's up the road in Sperryville.

Sperry, like Mary Mostert, and Common Tator and/or his cut-and-paste source (Mikkelsonny, it is) drink too much Washington Kool-Aid.

[Common Tator]

Oh please. You do talk such a lot of gibberish. It is perfectly clear from Condit's lifestyle -- the secrecy, the separate cabs, the getting off at the wrong floor, the fake names, the strict rules, the bodyguards, the neckties under the bed, the gang bangs, the body shaving, etc. --

I havn't been in D.C. for years but you are painting a perfect picture of JFK and RFK when they first hit the senate. But Gary is not in their class. I don't think Garry ever got movie stars to do him.

A few years back I came out of a campaign event to find a currently serving Congressman getting a blow job in my Radio Station Van. It was no big deal. He wasn't even embarrased. They young girl wasn't either. She was a news reporter supposedly covering him. I had to admit that she covered him well. But her coverage sucked.

You are incredibly naive. I was in the media for 5 years before I found out some men actually had to ask for sex. I thought all men had at least 5 females a day offer them sex. I knew they asked those of us in the media. All the politicans I covered got similar offers too.

My first day on the job as a supervisor a young female came into my office lifted her skirt and said,"See anything you like?" I told my boss that something strange had just happened. I described what she had done and paused. My boss said, "I don't have all day to listen to you prattle. What was it happened that was strange?"

Have you have always been clueless or did you take lessons?

[Sacajaweau]

I love the sparring but in the long run you have to work with what you have...So here's a dozen reasons why Gary is soooo quiet.

1. Condit and Mikey last seen in Public at 12:50 leaving Cheney's office. At the same time, Chandra is getting off her computer.

2. Gary and Mikey have no alibi between 1 and 4 on May 1 except each other. In DC, a congressman who lives by the clock, it's almost impossible.

3. The mysterious doctor's appointment.

4. The blatant lying to Mrs. Levy and the with-holding of information from the police.

5. No calls to Levy after May 1 (They talked to each other every day).

6. The famous train story on the Chung interview.

7. The threats to the other mistresses.

8. The watchbox fiasco.

9. And that infamous phone call from Luray where there is a small airport. (Gary's name was on some kind of list there when I searched the site in 2001). I can only speculate that Lynch came in to settle Gary and Mikey down.

10. The private lie detector test.

11.And then there's the deafening silence from his buddies in Congress which now exists.

12. Somewhere there's a squeeler.

[Victoria Delsoul]

A married man with a Boy Scout image, he was hiding from a burgeoning sex scandal; he wasn't hiding a body. (I'm sure he had the same rationale for hiding evidence of a gift - the watch - from another woman.)

Right. I also believe in Santa, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy. ;-)

[crystalk]

This orig post is nothing but Conditista bull, propaganda.

There is nothing in what we anti-Condit posters say, that would require he took the body to Luray, or even indicate that. My own posts since 5/23 have said that I think he let it rot down for a time in a car trunk parked somewhere in DC, then had it thrown out in RCP.

But regardless of whether it was killed fresh in RCP, brought there fresh, brought there stale, or brought there after a time in Luray (even)...the fact is, Condidit!

This story is nothing but the classic propaganda line of taking some of the more obscure speculation on one's opponent's side, and making it look like everyone on that side believes it, OR THAT IT WOULD SOMEHOW BE NECESSARY for that obscure speculation to be true, for Condit to have done it!

If she was murdered right there on the slope in Rock Creek Park on 5/1, and never moved again at all, Condit still did it, and don't you forget it!

[After all, some rather far-out specs have been made by the pro-Condit people, too. M'gawd, why do we have to deal with THIS?]

[jpl]

My first day on the job as a supervisor a young female came into my office lifted her skirt and said,"See anything you like?"

Man, I definitely need to quit this gig as a software engineer.

[The Great Satan]

Relax, he's blowing smoke up your ass. Now, if you were a bartender, on the other hand...

[crystalk]

I would also remind all on this thread, that IT WAS CONDIT who brought Luray into the Levy discussion, by actually going there and BEING THERE, on the first day in the whole session when he ever missed a vote! (5-17-01)

"WE" do not have to explain Luray;--- CONDIT does! "EYE" wasn't in Luray, Condit was! Luray wasn't invented as some wild-eyed fiction in the mind of someone out to get Condit-- IT ENTERED THE DISCUSSION ONLY BECAUSE HE ACTUALLY WENT THERE.

It is the Conditista side that must explain it away, and one reason some wild ideas got bandied about, is because the Condit side has never come forward with Word One about it. Not one word, not one hint. Luray is not imaginary, friends. It does exist, and Condit was there. And he will not explain what he was doing, something pretty important to spoil one of the best attendance records in Congress!

One could also note in passing, that when the Levy family came to DC to start the PR ball rolling in their own campaign to find out what happened to Chandra, for some reason they did so with a kickoff quite far out in the Virginia suburbs, (from 5-15- to 5-19-01 IIRC) this despite Chandra's having both lived and worked only in the District.

They could easily have done this, and got if anything more attention and better news coverage, in DC itself, but for some reason it was done quite far out into the Va. suburbs. Why?

[dalebert]

Sperry has some facts wrong.

[Balata]

Bump for a later read.