She was going to the press and tell all.
Walking into any media operation large or small and claiming that you can prove you had sex with a Congressman is worthless. Ninety percent of the media guys have had sex with female journalism interns. The other 10 percent of the media did not have sex with female interns because they are gay. They had sex with gay male interns. Media types consider themselves superior to regular society. Anyone who has spent more than 2 hours in the Washington Press Corp knows that is a fact and knows they tend to enjoy the physical pleasures using lesser or aspiring mortals. You couldn't get Dan Rather to look up from his desk. The only reason Chandra was a story was becaused she was killed. The only reaction to her vist to the media to expose condit would have been after she left. Some wag in the news room would say, "It must be a rule. In your mid fifties it does not matter if you are a congressman or president. All you can get are the fat and ugly ones." It would not make the news or the wire. It would have gotten a mild laugh. Anyone with washington media or political experience has to know that the only way Condit could get any media attention about his relationship with Chandra was if she was killed. So they believe when she threatened to go to the media he did the one and only thing that could get the story in the media. RIGHT!!!.2. Chandra threatened to tell Condit's wife.
So the situation is, Condit has been accused of having sex with an intern and then killing her. What did his wife do when this happend? She stood behind Condit 100 percent, is what happened. They motive geniuses are saying "His wife stood behind him when he only had sex with an intern and then killed her. Sure she would stand behind him for that. But if he hadn't of kllled Chandra and only had sex with her, his wife would have dropped him in a New York minute, and condemed him to the world. He had to kill her . How else could he guarantee his wifes support. Sure she stands behind a guy that cheats and kills. But a guy that only cheats... Hey No way!!!" Does that work for You?3. Condit was hung up on Chandra and killed her in a jealous rage.
That is wild. Everyone says Condit has has dozens if not
hundreds of woman.. very much like Clinton. To men like
Condit and Clinton having sex with a female is like having
a female fix him a sandwich. There is zero committment on
his part. Condit killing Chandra makes about as much sense
as Clinton killing the grill worker at a Mickey Dees
because she made a Big Mac for another guy.
Sexual Fidelity in marriage is applied by these men and the women who marry them in the same way we apply marriage fidelity to our relationship with the grill cook at McDonalds. Hillary and Mrs. Condit react to
infidelity the same way your wife would if the McDonalds
grill cook told her, "I fixed your hubby a Big Mac for
lunch. Not only that he wanted have fries with it and I
fixed them for him, too."
When that gets you in divorce court, having sex with
an intern will get Condit and Clinton there too.
It is plain to anyone who has been around people like
Clinton and Condit that either would be more likely to kill
the sandwich provider at a fast food joint than a sex
provider at the office. To such people marriage is no more
about sexual fidelity than it is about hamburger and fries fidelity.
What is truely frightening, especially for those in the media, is they have made it easier for the killer to get away with it. The Cops spend all their time playing games with Condit and the media, rather than trying to find the body or the killer. They searched Condit's appartment a lot better than they did the park. Those who have gone public with "Condit did it" are very ignorant of the thought processes of serial killers. Serial killers of females get great pleasure in getting away with it. But for some strange reason, they also are angry when others are given "credit" for their murders. Talk to the criminologists who specialize in serial killers and that is what you will be told.
One way their twisted minds react to those that "give the credit" to the wrong person, is to imagine killing the females close to those that don't give them credit. Would a serial killer act it out? I don't know. But I suspose they could.
A lot of the "Condit did it" people in the media and the public must be very brave... or very ignorant of how the minds of serial killers work.
Oh please. You do talk such a lot of gibberish. It is perfectly clear from Condit's lifestyle -- the secrecy, the separate cabs, the getting off at the wrong floor, the fake names, the strict rules, the bodyguards, the neckties under the bed, the gang bangs, the body shaving, etc. -- that Condit had ample motive to kill a wayward "bitch." Just look at the guy's face -- he's a white trash psycho, just like his brother, only with a manicure and a $100 haircut. His actions since Chandra's disappearance make it perfectly clear that he is the killer. It's perfectly bloody obvious to anyone with a lick of sense.