Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DVD-compatible optical disk hits 100 Gbytes
EE Times ^ | May 24, 2002 | Mike Clendenin

Posted on 06/18/2002 12:04:57 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

EE Times DVD-compatible optical disk hits 100 Gbytes
By Mike Clendenin, EE Times
May 24, 2002 (9:18 AM)
URL: http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20020524S0063

TAIPEI, Taiwan — Forget about 100-gigabyte portable hard drives — too bulky. A physics professor at a leading Taiwanese university has led a group of researchers in developing a recordable optical disk capable of packing in 100 Gbytes of data and slipping into a pants pocket.

That's about 30,000 of your favorite songs, or enough tunes to toe-tap to for a few months.

The disk is compatible with today's CD and DVD technology, running off the same red laser pick-up heads used in a typical disk player. "That's the most attractive part of this technology," said Wang Shyh-Yeu, director of research at Ritek Corp., a disk maker that co-funded the study and will likely commercialize the disk in 2005 or 2006.

To achieve the 100-Gbyte density target, the research team at National Taiwan University, led by professor Tsai Din Ping, used near-field optics — where the distance used for the interaction of the laser and media is shorter than the wavelength of light used to make the recording marks on the disk.

Two layers were added to the disk to achieve the near-field effect. The first is a transparent dielectric spacing layer, about 20 nanometers to 40 nanometers thick, which keeps the distance constant in the near field. The other layer is an active layer, which will interact with the focus point of the laser beam, generate the near-field effect and then transfer the mark to the recording layer.

Smaller mark

Using a standard sized disk, 12 centimeters in diameter, the researchers drew down the mark size to about 100 nm, less than about 400 nm for today's DVDs and 900 nm for CDs. "Even with such a small mark size, we can still have about 35 dB on the readout signal," Tsai said. "If you check your DVD disk today, the readout range is about the same, from 30 dB to 40 dB. So that's a very good result because the mark size is much smaller than 400 nm but the carrier-to-noise ratio is still very good. That's not easy."

Japanese companies and university researchers have also been developing high-density prototypes. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. developed a dual-layer rewritable optical disk last year that could store 50 Gbytes per side, enough for four hours of high-definition movies. It used violet lasers, however, not red lasers.

Tsai said his prototype is ready to hit the market today, but Wang doubts the market is ready. The disk may be capable of recording dozens of Star Trek episodes, but there aren't any drives available to utilize it and no one is working on one. Such systems would also require a new chip set. "Today's technology still has a ways to go before this is needed," Wang said.

In the meantime, Wang said Ritek should work on polishing the signal-to-noise characteristics on disks in the 40-Gbyte to 60-Gbyte range, which would still far outstrip today's 9.4-Gbyte maximum capacity for a dual-sided, dual-layer DVDs. Even next-generation proposals, such as Blu-ray DVDs, top out at about 27 Gbytes. Besides, they use pricier technology — they are based on blue lasers — that is not backward compatible with today's red laser standard. "The next two years will be very important for this technology," Wang said. "If we can get through the big breakthroughs we need, this will be a threat to Blu-ray."

During that time, however, Tsai will be prodding his team to push the limits of density even further. Ritek and Taiwan's National Science Council are funding the research until February 2003 with $660,000 — the project started in March 2000. "Our goal is to make an even smaller mark size that will still be stable within the near field. To do this, we will have to find a nanostructure to make this happen in a much easier way," Tsai said.

"One hundred gigabytes is not the limit; it is just the beginning. Our goal is terabit," he said.





TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Technical
KEYWORDS: cd; dvd; storage; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Dimensio
The RIAA and the MPAA are demanding that Congress pass legislation banning this kind of technology,

What are they afraid it might capture their souls, oh wait, all you need is a AppleII with 64K.

21 posted on 06/18/2002 7:13:35 AM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
What are they afraid it might capture their souls,

Oxymoron.
22 posted on 06/18/2002 7:43:16 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
This just in. The RIAA and the MPAA are demanding that Congress pass legislation banning this kind of technology, citing piracy concerns.

Back in the mid-80s, the RIAA actually attempted to outlaw digital music altogether, making it illegal to put music into digitized form, a little fact seldom reported in these post-Napster times, but true.

23 posted on 06/18/2002 7:45:12 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Just for some context:

One hour of a movie, at full 35mm film resolution (not "digital cinema") theater quality with no compression, takes 1 terabyte of storage.

With lossless compression, a full 2-3 hour movie takes 1TB.
With mild lossy compression (you won't notice the difference), a whole theater-quality movie could fit on 2-3 of these 100GB discs.

24 posted on 06/18/2002 7:55:05 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Looks like the market may be ready then.

So much technology is arriving ahead of people's perceived need for it.

25 posted on 06/18/2002 8:37:23 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Here is a likely example:

________________________________________________________________________________________

FMD: coulda been a contenda
We should also mention here a technology often written up alongside all of the above, namely FMD or fluorescent multilayer disc, from New York-based Constellation 3D.

Instead of the reflective coating found in existing discs, FMD uses fluorescent dyes to coat multiple layers of substrate within each disc. Current DVDs use only two layers on a single-sided disc because the reflective coating causes too much interference for data to be read back. But fluorescent dyes, which don't cause a noise problem, record data by emitting fluorescent light in varying patterns to represent 1s and 0s. FMD increases capacity simply because it uses more of the media in a disc of the same size.

Constellation was promising a DVD-sized disc that could hold 140GB of data using red lasers, or more than a terabyte using blue lasers. Last July, the company seemed to be on the verge of a breakthrough when it signed a licensing deal with Warner Advanced Media Operations (WAMO), an AOL subsidiary and one of the world's largest manufacturers of DVDs.

Last July, the company seemed to be on the verge of a breakthrough.
But since then, Constellation 3D has fallen victim to the economic downturn and perhaps to its own failure to meet the manufacturing goals established with WAMO. It's hard to tell exactly what went wrong; none of the company's executives nor its partners will return calls for comment. The employees that haven't been actually laid off are reportedly working without pay and have vacated their offices. The company is still traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap market, but has fallen to less than 30 cents per share from a high of more than $60.

The company is awaiting a life-sustaining infusion of cash from a mysterious Swiss company called TIC Target Investing Consulting, which was supposed to have provided a $15 million investment in March but has so far failed to do so despite repeated assurances of its good intentions.

If Constellation 3D goes under, which seems likely, then its patents may well resurface with another player, but for the time being, this promising technology, once considered a potential DVD killer by Byte magazine and other major trade titles, appears to be down for the count.

26 posted on 06/18/2002 8:41:51 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The above is from the link at post #4.
27 posted on 06/18/2002 8:43:05 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Alan Chapman
What comes after a Yottabyte?
28 posted on 06/18/2002 8:45:46 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Indigestion and heartburn.
29 posted on 06/18/2002 8:52:05 AM PDT by ken in texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Lukasbyte?
30 posted on 06/18/2002 9:14:11 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon
"A petabyte here, a zettabyte there -- pretty soon you're talking some real storage ..." ;^)

It's not uncommon for big companies to have terabytes of storage. I used to work for one. Our tape library held 24 terabytes. Our nightly backups (differential backups) were running between 300-500 gigabytes and our weekend backups (full backups) were running 1.2-1.5 terabytes. I don't know who has the largest storage but I'd bet it's Lucasfilm. I don't know if anyone has petabyte storage.

31 posted on 06/18/2002 10:54:26 AM PDT by Alan Chapman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
What comes after a Yottabyte?

No idea.

32 posted on 06/18/2002 10:55:54 AM PDT by Alan Chapman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Alan Chapman
I'm very familiar with tape backups here -- the venerable 4mm drives at the engineering firm store mere hundreds of gigabytes of data in total during the weekly full backups. Still, it's hard to conceive of having to back up petabytes (much less terabytes) of data on a regular basis!
33 posted on 06/18/2002 12:07:20 PM PDT by mikrofon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Alan Chapman
Try Los Alamos National Labs!
34 posted on 06/18/2002 12:09:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
What comes after a Yottabyte?

Yattabyte?

35 posted on 06/18/2002 12:12:08 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
What comes after a Yottabyte?

After Yotta- you get

Heckuva-, then you get

Helluva-.

36 posted on 06/18/2002 12:27:21 PM PDT by The Chid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson