Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Probe Sought in Leaked Intelligence
AP Online via COMTEX ^ | JOHN J. LUMPKIN

Posted on 06/20/2002 1:33:20 PM PDT by grimalkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: PhiKapMom
Did CNN break the original story that came out this week -- I remember commenting that I thought it was a leak of classified intelligence information. If CNN had the original story, then my guess would be Edwards who seems to be their poster boy.

Yes, it was CNN. Wolf Blitzer was bragging about it tonight. That demonstrates just how far CNN has fallen when they brag about leaking classified information.

Fox's Carl Cameron said tonight that Fox learned about it last week but chose not to broadcast it. That bit of info sheds new light on this sordid mystery.

61 posted on 06/20/2002 4:53:07 PM PDT by yikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
You know something you may have handled classified information. Heck you may have even leaked some. But you immediately make assumptions based on news reports and political hipe. Want to make book that the investigation goes no where? It dies? No finding? That the quote was not accurate? Finally, just because the White House says CNN leaked the Satphone data, does not mean that is what happened at all. I will remind you it was the White House that wanted a hand picked chosen independent committee to handle the investigation. You just right ahead and blindly follow along. We will see what turns up.

Its simple, I do not buy tis. Lastly, there was nothing lost here. I'll make book on that too.

62 posted on 06/20/2002 4:59:02 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
My $.02? Dianne Feinstein, California. People tend to be consistent in their weakness.
63 posted on 06/20/2002 5:02:06 PM PDT by 68 grunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yikes
"Fox's Carl Cameron said tonight that Fox learned about it last week but chose not to broadcast it. That bit of info sheds new light on this sordid mystery."

This is hog wash! Cameron broke the Israeli Spy Story he had no problem with LEAKING A 50 to 65 PAGE C-L-A-S-S-I-F-I-E-D Document. Cameron would be the first one to go with a story like this. This sound like spoiled milk to me. Gee the pot calling the kettle black.

64 posted on 06/20/2002 5:07:29 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
The way to find a leaker is NOT to announce a probe of the leaking.

The way to catch a leaker is to leak different classified information to each potential leaker, and see which bit gets leaked.

These guys aren't serious about finding the traitor. Or they already know who it is and that person CAN'T be uncovered for political reasons.

65 posted on 06/20/2002 5:10:30 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
I'll make book on that too.

Ok, how about you "make" some odds.

66 posted on 06/20/2002 5:17:59 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
OK! Let's see 6 to 1, NADA!
67 posted on 06/20/2002 5:21:59 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
Fleischer said "we do not know who did it,"

All you have to do is find out which members of the Democratic Socialists of America had access to this info, and there is your guilty party. Simple.

68 posted on 06/20/2002 5:23:03 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
"Nonsense!"

Whatever your political persuasion, your view of security matters is distinctly that of a liberal. You seem to have no respect for, nor understanding of, legitimate security concerns.

Thus, I sincerely hope you are never in a position where you might be trusted with some responsibility in this regard.

Are you assuming that the enemy knows everything anyway, so "What's the use?"

69 posted on 06/20/2002 5:38:13 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke; PhiKapMom
"But you immediately make assumptions based on news reports and political hipe."

What then, pray tell, are you doing?

70 posted on 06/20/2002 5:41:21 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"Are you assuming that the enemy knows everything anyway, so "What's the use?"

I am not saying this at all. But if you think that its a big secret that we intercept communications then your not thinking. Bin Laden's organization has many intelligence ties. The Saudi's the Paki's, the Iraqi's, the Syrians, Egyptians, and even the Iranians. They covered his back a number of times. If you think that Bin Laden stopped using his Sat because CNN said we were listening then you will believe anything.

What I am saying is that there is a major investigation on-going on Capitol Hill. Which means there is major league politics going on. Leaks? Shoot this leak is minor compared to some leaks. Now the American Public has a right to know somethings I SAID SOMETHINGS. Now everyone in DC knows that House and Senate Select is a strainer for information. One should control the data coming out NOT CLOSE IT OFF. The data leaked today is minor, but with politics nothing is minor. My read is that NSA popped a gasket for using the "I" word and their name. I bet that if the leak was sourced differently there would have been no complains. Realize the folk at NSA are really touchy about these things, rightfully so. The VeeP wanted to shut it down before it got out of hand.

The American public has some right to know some of the details. By not controling and releasing some details will only make matters worse.

71 posted on 06/20/2002 6:03:41 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: okie01
:What then, pray tell, are you doing?"

Not what your doing!

72 posted on 06/20/2002 6:04:52 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Non of the above.....
73 posted on 06/20/2002 6:20:47 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
Um, I don't get your comment?
74 posted on 06/20/2002 6:22:45 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Leaky whathisname? Is Gary on this committee? John McCain?
One thing's for sure it one of the dems.
75 posted on 06/20/2002 6:27:18 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Your post number 10! NONE OF THE ABOVE! was my reply.
76 posted on 06/20/2002 6:38:09 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
None of the above congressman were guilty of leaking? OK. Although I still think Gary Condit is being blackmailed or at the very least is compromised.
77 posted on 06/20/2002 6:40:29 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
"But if you think that its a big secret that we intercept communications then your not thinking."

Who said I did? It is no revelation that NSA is involved in reading other people's mail or that they intercepted messages that constitutes a security breach. Instead, it is the time and day of the messages and the precise words, as translated.

This allows the enemy to determine who was being intercepted, while in conversation with who, by what method and by source -- humint or electronic.

There is no need whatsoever to make this information public. And it gives clear "aid & comfort" to the enemy's own intelligence services.

If you don't see this, you are blind to the realities of wartime security requirements.

78 posted on 06/20/2002 6:56:08 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"If you don't see this, you are blind to the realities of wartime security requirements."

Your blind to the politics of national security.

79 posted on 06/20/2002 7:07:35 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
"Your blind to the politics of national security."

I am quite aware that there are political implications involved in both the original leak and in identifying its source. That's a separate subject and not my concern, at the moment.

Is it your view, then, that no harm was done by the leak? And that none would be done should such leaks continue in the future?

You are certain of that...???

80 posted on 06/20/2002 7:28:05 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson