Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Probe Sought in Leaked Intelligence
AP Online via COMTEX ^ | JOHN J. LUMPKIN

Posted on 06/20/2002 1:33:20 PM PDT by grimalkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: okie01
"Is it your view, then, that no harm was done by the leak? And that none would be done should such leaks continue in the future?

You are certain of that...????"

NO direct national security damage was done with this leak! The future I will not comment on. It depends on the leak, If sources and methods are endangered then someone will need to be sent to jail. Remember now it was only five years ago that Senator Torricelli then a Congressman leaked real bad stuff causing two of our CIA Officers to be killed. His punishment? He was removed from house select and then ran and won the NJ Senate race. So much for justice! BTW the two CIA Officers are still dead. Republicans have done the same thing including Saxby Chambliss.

The politics of national security. All Americans should be alarmed! But they are grazing!

81 posted on 06/20/2002 7:44:11 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
NO direct national security damage was done with this leak!...If sources and methods are endangered then someone will need to be sent to jail.

I am in complete agreement with your second sentence. And with your overall concern for the politicization of wartime intelligence matters. By any party...

But how can you be so absolutely certain that this leak did not "endanger...sources and methods"? And skip the hooey about "everybody knows NSA, etc.". Of course they do.

But how do you know that no source or method has been compromised by releasing the specific time & date of specifically worded conversations? And that no enemy has not been made more alert to our eavesdropping abilities? And, thus, more difficult to eavesdrop upon.

And if this one does not, how will you determine whether the next leak does, or does not, endanger sources and methods?

Seems to me that a basic security principle has been violated in this case.

82 posted on 06/20/2002 8:00:31 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"But how can you be so absolutely certain that this leak did not "endanger...sources and methods"?"

Lets just say I understand the system and leave it at that. But in case you have doubts, just wait and see for yourself. If this was a breach that endangered the national security of the United States its sources and methods I would ne going bonkers. So would many other people. If anything comes of this its going to be some low level staffer who will be hung out to dry. Thats if anything comes from it. The message has been delivered by the administration.

83 posted on 06/20/2002 8:13:47 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
"Lets just say I understand the system and leave it at that."

If you say so. We've beat it to a bloody pulp, anyway.

See ya around...

84 posted on 06/20/2002 8:36:35 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I second that. Carl Levin will be the one that is found leaking information. Why that jask@$$ is on this committee and the Armed Services committee I will never know.
85 posted on 06/21/2002 6:57:17 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
This is hog wash!

No, you're wrong! Cameron said again today that Fox broke this story last week but did not state the exact words that were used for national security considerations.

We can tell that he is not lying because if Cameron had used the exact words, Cheney would have been livid a week ago. Avoid leaping to the keyboard until you have thought things through, man. Emotional responses are useless!!!

86 posted on 06/21/2002 10:22:25 AM PDT by yikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: yikes
Ditto on the hogwash! Lets get serious. This leak with it’s exact phrase was out over a week ago. Cameron and others knew over a week ago. This was breached over a week ago! So what is Cameron’s security clearance? What because reporters have classified information and as long as they don’t release it it’s ok? Why the wait for the screaming? Why wasn’t the FBI launched over a week ago? If this was as serious a leak as is being told, then why wait? Because it was broken to the public? The press is that trustworthy? Nonsense. I am not sure that this information was leaked by the legislative branch in the first place.

Please don’t feed me this emotional babble either. Cameron broke the Israeli Spy Story, which was fine with me. It was news. What was NOT FINE was that Cameron leaked a 50 or 60 page CLASSIFIED INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENT! Lets talk about protecting SOURCES AND METHODS! This is much worse than what ever CNN just did. This is a double standard with the press.

This is nothing more than political hog wash! If everyone is going to be serious about leaks, then first let's be real. Forget if it's a Republican or Democrat! Let's get serious, this is Washington D.C.

87 posted on 06/21/2002 11:21:00 AM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
Chill, man!
88 posted on 06/21/2002 4:38:54 PM PDT by yikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson