Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Little Horn Massacre ( NYT 1876
NYT ^ | June 25, 1976

Posted on 06/24/2002 8:02:42 PM PDT by swarthyguy

Latest Accounts of the Charge -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Force of Four Thousand Indians in Position Attacked by Less Than Four Hundred Troops--Opinions of Leading Army Officers of the Deed and Its Consequences--Feeling in the Community Over the Disaster --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Special Dispatch to the New York Times

RELATED HEADLINES Confirmations of the Disaster: Dispatches From Gen. Terry Received at Sheridan's Head-Quarters--Theories of the Battle--Probably Ten Thousand Sioux in Position--The Attack Condemned as Rash by Officers of Experience--Disposition of the Wounded

Dispatches from Gen. Terry: Particulars of the Plan of the Movement Under Custer as Agreed on Before the March

The Causes and Consequences: Fruits of the Ill-Advised Black Hills Expedition of Two Years Ago--Ability of the Army to Renew Operations Effectively Discussed--The Personnel of the Charging Party Still Undefined

Views at the War Department: The Confirmatory Dispatches from Sheridan's Head-Quarters in Chicago--Feeling Among Custer's Friends

Miscellaneous Dispatches: A List of Officers Killed--Feeling Over the Disaster--A Regiment of Frontiersmen Offered from Utah

Sketch of Gen. Custer

Record of the Regiment: The Officers, and What They Have Done--The Dates of Their Promotions

An Interview with Col. Crofton, Commanding Governor's Island--His Recollections of Gen. Custer and the Officers of the Seventh

A Tilden Electioneering Trick: State Engineer Van Buren's Report to the Canal Board--What It Really Is and What It Purports To Be

OTHER HEADLINES

Mr. Blaine's Illiness: No Change in His Condition--A European Trip Recommended

The Democrats in Washington: A Weak Ratification of Tilden--A Four-Minute Torch-light Procession

French Politics: Differences Among the Republican Deputies on Municipal Matters--Reported Attempt to Shoot the Duc de Chartres

he dispatches giving an account of the slaughter of Gen. Custer's command, published by The Times of yesterday, are confirmed and supplemented by official reports from Gen. A.H. Terry, commanding the expedition. On June 25 Gen. Custer's command came upon the main camp of Sitting Bull, and at once attacked it, charging the thickest part of it with five companies, Major Reno, with seven companies attacking on the other side. The soldiers were repulsed and a wholesale slaughter ensued. Gen. Custer, his brother, his nephew, and his brother-in-law were killed, and not one of his detachment escaped. The Indians surrounded Major Reno's command and held them in the hills during a whole day, but Gibbon's command came up and the Indians left. The number of killed is stated at 300 and the wounded at 31. Two hundred and seven men are said to have been buried in one place. The list of killed includes seventeen commissioned officers.

It is the opinion of Army officers in Chicago, Washington, and Philadelphia, including Gens. Sherman and Sheridan, that Gen. Custer was rashly imprudent to attack such a large number of Indians, Sitting Bull's force being 4,000 strong. Gen. Sherman thinks that the accounts of the disaster are exaggerated. The wounded soldiers are being conveyed to Fort Lincoln. Additional details are anxiously awaited throughout the country. Details of the Battle

Graphic Description of the Fighting--Major Reno's Command Under Fire for Two Days-- Every Man of Custer's Detachment Killed Except One Scout--Affecting Scenes When Relief Arrived

Special Dispatch to the New York Times

Chicago, July 6.--A special to the Times tonight from Bismarck, recounts most graphically the late encounter with the Indians on the Little Big Horn. Gen. Custer left the Rosebud on June 22, with twelve companies of the Seventh Cavalry, striking a trail where Reno left it, leading in the direction of the Little Horn. On the evening of the 24th fresh trails were reported, and on the morning of the 25th an Indian village, twenty miles above the mouth of the Little Horn was reported about three miles long and half a mile wide and fifteen miles away. Custer pushed his command rapidly through. They had made a march of seventy-eight miles in twenty-four hours preceding the battle. When near the village it was discovered that the Indians were moving in hot haste as if retreating. Reno, with seven companies of the Seventh Cavalry, was ordered to the left to attack the village at its head, while Custer, with five companies, went to the right and commenced a vigorous attack. Reno felt of them with three companies of cavalry, and was almost instantly surrounded, and after one hour or more of vigorous fighting, during which he lost Lieuts. Hodgson and McIntosh and Dr. Dewolf and twelve men, with several Indian scouts killed and many wounded, he cut his way through to the river and gained a bluff 300 feet in height, where he intrenched and was soon joined by Col. Benton with four companies. In the meantime the Indians resumed the attack, making repeated and desperate charges, which were repulsed with great slaughter to the Indians. They gained higher ground than Reno occupied, and as their arms were longer range and better than the cavalry's, they kept up a galling fire until nightfall. During the night Reno strengthened his position, and was prepared for another attack, which was made at daylight.

The day wore on. Reno had lost in killed and wounded a large portion of his command, forty odd having been killed before the bluff was reached, many of them in hand to hand conflict with the Indians, who outnumbered them ten to one, and his men had been without water for thirty-six hours. The suffering was heartrending. In this state of affairs they determined to reach the water at all hazards, and Col. Benton made a sally with his company, and routed the main body of the Indians who were guarding the approach to the river. The Indian sharpshooters were nearly opposite the mouth of the ravine through which the brave boys approached the river, but the attempt was made, and though one man was killed and seven wounded the water was gained and the command relieved. When the fighting ceased for the night Reno further prepared for attacks.

There had been forty-eight hours' fighting, with no word from Custer. Twenty-four hours more of fighting and the suspense ended, when the Indians abandoned their village in great haste and confusion. Reno knew then that succor was near at hand. Gen. Terry, with Gibbon commanding his own infantry, had arrived, and as the comrades met men wept on each other's necks. Inquiries were then made for Custer, but none could tell where he was. Soon an officer came rushing into camp and related that he had found Custer, dead, stripped naked, but not mutilated, and near him his two brothers, Col. Tom and Boston Custer. His brother-in-law, Col. Calhoun, and his nephew Col. Yates. Col. Keogh, Capt. Smith, Lieut. Crittenden, Lieut. Sturgis, Col. Cooke, Lieut. Porter, Lieut. Harrington, Dr. Lord, Mack Kellogg, the Bismarck Tribune correspondent, and 190 men and scouts. Custer went into battle with Companies C, L, I, F, and E, of the Seventh Cavalry, and the staff and non-commissioned staff of his regiment and a number of scouts, and only one Crow scout remained to tell the tale. All are dead. Custer was surrounded on every side by Indians, and horses fell as they fought on skirmish line or in line of battle. Custer was among the last who fell, but when his cheering voice was no longer heard, the Indians made easy work of the remainder. The bodies of all save the newspaper correspondent were stripped, and most of them were horribly mutilated. Custer's was not mutilated. He was shot through the body and through the head. The troops cared for the wounded and buried the dead, and returned to their base for supplies and instructions from the General of the Army.

Col. Smith arrived at Bismarck last night with thirty-five of the wounded. The Indians lost heavily in the battle. The Crow Scout survived by hiding in a ravine. He believes the Indians lost more than the whites. The village numbered 1,800 lodges, and it is thought there were 4,000 warriors. Gen. Custer was directed by Gen. Terry to find and feel of the Indians, but not to fight unless Terry arrived with infantry and with Gibbon's column. The casualties foot up 261 killed and fifty-two wounded.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: custer; history; historylist; indian; sioux
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2002 8:02:43 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy; aculeus; Orual; BlueLancer; general_re
Just a minute, swarthyguy. You're in charge of dot-Indian affairs here. These are feather Indians. What gives?

Just kiddin'. It's a fascinating post.

2 posted on 06/24/2002 8:09:58 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *History_list
.
3 posted on 06/24/2002 8:12:50 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Imagine what courage it took for Benton and his men to go for that water. Awesome!
4 posted on 06/24/2002 8:17:13 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Yes it is a facinating post. Pinging for another read.
5 posted on 06/24/2002 8:23:32 PM PDT by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
We visited the battle field 7 years ago. I could have stayed for hours but we had a deadline in Twin Bridges Mont. According to the Docent there the Indians took their dead with them and it is not known how many were killed.
6 posted on 06/24/2002 8:42:31 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy; dighton
Why is this not in "Breaking News"?
7 posted on 06/24/2002 8:54:14 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
It is the opinion of Army officers in Chicago, Washington, and Philadelphia, including Gens. Sherman and Sheridan, that Gen. Custer was rashly imprudent to attack such a large number of Indians, Sitting Bull's force being 4,000 strong.

It's interesting to see that, even in the immediate aftermath, the blame was immediately settling on Custer. And, IMO, that's exactly where it belonged...

8 posted on 06/24/2002 9:04:18 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I think Bill Cosby described that battle. It was a toss of a coin. Custer lost the coin toss and had to sit at the bottom of the hill while Sitting Bull and all the Indians in the world rode right down on them.
9 posted on 06/24/2002 9:22:16 PM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
Grant Marsh, skipper of the steamer "Far West," brought the wounded down river to Bismarck in record time. He was a hero for this feat of Missouri River navigation. Another part of the story is, the telegrapher in Bismarck transmitted passages from the Bible and any other written thing at hand in order to keep the line open so he could report the massacre to those back east. There were two survivors. The Indian scout and a horse whose name I forget.
10 posted on 06/24/2002 9:24:14 PM PDT by Whispering Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Whispering Smith
The surviving horse was named Comanche?
11 posted on 06/24/2002 9:37:04 PM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
LOL - that's a better explanation for preserving Custer's posterity than what really happened, anyway ;)
12 posted on 06/24/2002 9:39:00 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: general_re
LOL - that's a better explanation for preserving Custer's posterity than what really happened, anyway ;)

If Custer had listen to Bridger he likely would have avoided the whole mess.

Ok I admit I remember a lot of history on this battle by being a Johnny Horton fan.

13 posted on 06/24/2002 9:48:24 PM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Ok I admit I remember a lot of history on this battle by being a Johnny Horton fan.

LOL - probably not the best source for your history ;)

14 posted on 06/24/2002 9:59:09 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: general_re
LOL - probably not the best source for your history ;)

I reckon you're right but then again the songs were written before history PC hit the schools. Though I do doubt very seriously Old Hickory used an aligator for a cannon :>}

15 posted on 06/24/2002 10:07:17 PM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

16 posted on 06/24/2002 10:08:44 PM PDT by primeval patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
"It is the opinion of Army officers in Chicago, Washington, and Philadelphia, including Gens. Sherman and Sheridan, that Gen. Custer was rashly imprudent to attack such a large number of Indians"

An understatement.

.

17 posted on 06/25/2002 2:00:28 AM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Part of the Battle Field where Custer fell at the Little Big Horn.


18 posted on 06/25/2002 2:16:04 AM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whispering Smith
Comanche

Comanche was a 15 hand bay gelding, thought to be part mustang and part Morgan. He was bought by the U.S. Army in 1868 in St. Louis, and sent to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. He was a good looking horse, and instead of being kept with the regular cavalry, Captain, Myles Keogh, bought him for $90 to use as his personal mount. He normally rode his horse Paddy on marches, Comanche following with the other extra horses. Comanche was the horse Captain Keogh rode into battle, the horse being fresh because he was only mounted at the last moment before the fighting began. He was a war horse.

Captain Keogh was in Custer's 7th Cavalry. In the fall of 1868, his unit fought the Comanche tribe in Kansas. During the battle, the horse was wounded, but the Captain did not know that and continued to fight from his back until the battle was over. Afterward, he discovered an arrow broken off in the horse's hindquarters. The wound was treated and after the horse recovered, he had earned the name Comanche for his bravery in continuing to carry his master despite his own pain.

In 1870 during a battle again against the Comanche tribe, the horse was wounded in the leg. He was lame for over a month this time, but recovered. Then, in 1871, Comanche was wounded in battle once more, this time in his shoulder, and once again, he recovered quickly. The cavalry was very proud of this brave horse who continued to go into battle despite being wounded so many times.

In 1876, Captain Keogh rode Comanche into the valley of the Little Big Horn and the battle known as Custer's Last Stand. This time they were fighting the Soux and Cheyenne tribes, and it was the last great battle for the Native Americans. They defeated the 7th cavalry and killed every soldier. The only member of the 7th cavalry left alive after the battle was Comanche.

Comanche was found two days after the battle with many wounds, and was very weak and barely able to stand. He was taken in a steam boat to Fort Lincoln, where he was so weak he had to be supported by a sling. He was nursed back to health, once again recovering from his battle wounds.

Comanche was officially retired and it was ordered that no one would ever ride him again. He was called "the Second Commanding Officer" of the 7th Cavalry. His only duties were to be lead in the front of official parades occasionally. It is said he developed a fondness for beer in his later years, and was such a pet at the fort that he was often indulged in this habit. He lived to the age of 29, and when he died his body was mounted and put on display at the University of Kansas, where it stands to this day.

19 posted on 06/25/2002 2:27:29 AM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Bump!
20 posted on 06/25/2002 9:13:43 AM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson