Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crypt2k
Answer: he wouldn't. But don't even try to talk sense. They think they know he's guilty, and that's that. Don't bother them with evidence.
38 posted on 07/12/2002 8:01:47 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious; All
My post from the other thread.......

Today's edition of the North County Times is not yet on their website, but I am a subscriber.

I will type/post two paragraphs from today's article titled "Affidavits Detail Remarks from Westerfield". I found it interesting.

Westerfield also attracted suspicion because in conversations with detectives he mentioned that Damon van Dam and Danielle were going to an upcoming father-daughter dance.

"Only Danielle van Dam could have told him about the dance and only after she had been abducted," police write in one of the affidavits.

This is a good example of their wish to pin everything on him. What a foolish deduction !!!

We have now heard that perhaps Brenda van Dam told DW about it. So how could police have decided that the ONLY way he knew it was from the child herself.

This is another example of customizing interpretations to fit the suspect they want it to fit. It's very disturbing, IMO.

47 posted on 07/12/2002 8:08:36 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson