Posted on 07/12/2002 9:13:48 PM PDT by kjenerette
Hey, that's no big deal. NURSES in hospitals often do not know if a patient is HIV+! This information can be withheld from the patient's medical record. So, if a patient is admitted for a surgical procedure, and does not want the staff to know he/she is HIV+, they will not know it. ALL patients are treated as if they are HIV+ and this is supposed to prevent transmission (Universal Precautions). This makes sense since some patients themselves may not know they have the virus.
The truth is, there are times when staff allow other priorities to take over, like when there's a Code Blue (cardiac arrest). At these times, some staff do not take adequate precautions. However, I DO. Nothing, not even a life and death emergency, can cause me to forego Universal Precautions.
However, some things increase the risk of a woman getting HIV from an HIV+ man. The main things are: (1) pre-existing venereal diseases or other vaginal infections that cause inflammation and increased likelihood of contact with bleeding tissue, (2) anal sex, because rectal tissue, unlike the vagina, is very friable and bleeds easily, and (3) violent sex that results in bloody bodily fluid exchange (gross, I know, but it's a fact, sorry).
Now, these facts do not set well with the P.C. set because it is in their interests to insist that EVERYONE is equally susceptible to the virus. That is simply not true.
Another case of P.C. madness in the medical field is the ridiculous insistence by the medical community that EVERY woman over a certain age have Pap smear tests annually or every other year. The truth is that 99% of all cervical cancer cases are directly attributable to genital warts. If you do not have warts on your genitalia (which are, BTW, incurable), it is NOT necessary and a waste of your insurer's money to have annual Pap smears. Women should continue to have pelvic exams at their time of their annual physical, but the Pap is not needed unless they have the warts (human papilloma virus). Period.
God bless you and your family.
Let me assure you, the bathhouses and backrooms at places like Lafitte's are FULL of hetero, married men "on business".
I've known several gay men over the years who specialized in hitting on just this sort of voyeur. They preferred seducing straight men and -- as it turns out -- it was probably the safer way to go in many respects. No strings. The opportunity to meet him subsequently "on business" elsewhere. And a manliness much desired by homosexuals that's not always readily obtainable among a bunch of screaming queens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.