Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Crucial Time in Israel and America
Koenig's International News ^ | 7/14/02 | Bill Koenig

Posted on 07/15/2002 7:25:12 AM PDT by truthandlife

The word appeasement has been on my mind this past week. I believe this is because the United States continues its attempt to appease the Arab interests pertaining to Israel’s covenant land.

The Merriam Webster dictionary provides one definition for appeasement: –“to buy off (an aggressor) by concessions usually at the sacrifice of principles.”

This definition is right on!

Isn’t it ironic that as the Bush Administration continues in its effort to “appease” the Arab nations, events continue to worsen weekly here in the United States.

We have weekly terror warnings, while we are becoming more obsessed daily with our protection. We hear our elected officials state weekly the nation’s security is foremost in their minds. However, we know the only security we have comes through the Almighty Lord. As the United States continues to throw billions of dollars at national security in an attempt to make us feel more secure, we continue to come against the only One who could give us real security, and that is our Lord.

We continue to rapidly move toward a direct collision with the God of Israel over His covenant land. It is my conviction that His fury is building over what is happening to the nation of Israel (not to forget our domestic condition).

Sadly enough, even the leadership in Israel is going along with the world’s plan over their land—yes, the land given to them by God through the everlasting Abrahamic covenant.

I asked an Israeli Embassy official last week about Israel’s government reaction to President Bush’s June 24 Middle East address. He stated they were very pleased about the message and the plan to deal with the Arafat issue.

I stated we (John McTernan and I) had written a book “Israel: The Blessing of the Curse” that approached the “land for peace” situation from two different perspectives. Our approach had to do with our observation of the nations of the world coming against Israel and Jerusalem as stated in the book of Zechariah.

I also mentioned that some of the largest catastrophes in the United States happened on the same day we [the US] applied pressure or spoke on plans pertaining to God‘s covenant land. He acknowledged there is a biblical view, but that they were looking to a practical solution. I quietly thought herein lies the biggest problem: man, the nation of Israel, and the US are looking for a practical solution when this is a biblical issue.

The same thinking is happening with our leaders at the White House. They have come up with a plan that looks good in the natural, but it is direct opposition to the Bible. With this in mind, should we expect any other outcome but a strong rebuke from our Lord?

The official also stated that 75% of Israel was in favor of a Palestinian state, and that they [Israel] preferred to have a state where the Jews were in the majority instead of eventually becoming a minority in the nation of Israel.

As I pondered his thoughts and watched the news this week in the United States and overseas, I sat in awe of how fast things are turning for the worse, especially in the United States.

This week President Bush and Vice President Cheney both came under attack for their previous business dealings: Bush over Harkins Energy, and Cheney for his endorsement of Arthur Anderson. In addition, Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch sued Cheney on behalf of the Haliburton shareholders, for alleged accounting fraud while he was a director of Halliburton. This further undermined the Bush administration’s attempts to deal with the scandals shaking corporate America.

Wall Street is continuing to reel over significant past and potential future accounting scandals, as well as expressing concerns over the next terror incident and its potential impact on financial markets. The markets are at post 9-11 lows; the Bush administration expects the federal government to post a deficit of $165 billion this fiscal year, a 56 percent increase over earlier projections due in part to a surprise downturn in tax revenue caused by the stock market sell-off; there were calls for the SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt to step down, while Bush said he would stand with him; 40% of the U.S. is experiencing drought, with the expectation of the largest fire season in US history; the Bush administration is in intense negotiations on Capital Hill over the Homeland Security bill; the Democratic majority in the US Senate continues to be a thorn in the side of the Bush Administration; a report to Congress made public yesterday states that China has located all of its 350 short-range missiles in a province near Taiwan and that its buildup not only threatens the island, but Japan and the Philippines as well; China has about 20 missiles capable of "targeting the United States" and is increasing the number to 30 by 2005 and possibly as many as 60 by 2010.

When did this downturn begin? We can point to the time around March 31, 2001.

As a reminder, President Bush’s first seventy-five days in office were smooth and calm. He wanted to be a facilitator in the Middle East, not an active participant. He brought home CIA personnel and closed down the White House envoy office in Israel in the first few days of his term.

On March 31, 2001, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak came to Washington (followed a few days later by King Abdullah II of Jordan) in a visit designed to convince President Bush of the importance of his reengaging in the Middle East talks. On the same day Mubarek arrived, a Chinese fighter jet bumped into a US Recognizance plane, forcing an emergency landing. This became President Bush’s first international crisis and the main focus when Mubarek and Abdullah were in Washington (the stand-off was finished the day after Abdullah’s meeting with President Bush and his departure from the United States). We have also seen the impact the standoff with China has had on US-China relations.

On May 22, 2001, President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell endorsed the Mitchell Plan—the same day Vermont Senator Jeffords acknowledged he was leaving the Republican Party, costing the Bush Administration their majority in the US Senate. This strategic blow has kept important legislation from passing, as well as the confirmation delays of important judicial appointments. This is costing the Bush Administration more every week.

Then we find out after the 9-11 terror events that the State Department, at the approval of the Bush Administration, had been working on a comprehensive covenant-land-giveaway message for five weeks prior to 9-11 to be given by Colin Powell to the UN General Assembly on behalf of the Bush Administration. The 9-11 events stopped that address from being given, and life has not been the same since in America.

Saudi Arabia’s Prince Bandar bin Sultan stated he went from being "the happiest man in the world" on Monday night, September 10, to experiencing the worst crisis of his career on September 11. Dreams of a new Middle East peace initiative evaporated. The realization that most of the hijackers were Saudis "fell on me ... like the whole house collapsed over my head," Bandar said later. He couldn't imagine a way to "do more damage or worse damage to Islam or to Saudi Arabia."

The Bush Administration has continued to pursue the peace course through cease-fire meetings in Israel, speeches, meetings, and public statements since then. In this time period (from March 31, 2001, to the present) matters have continued to worsen and deteriorate substantially in the United States.

My spirit is heavy, as is the spirit of many others that I have spoken to this week. We all know in the natural and in our spirits that we are rapidly moving into a very serious time; to this extent things are worsening weekly.

This coming Tuesday, July 16, there is a crucial meeting in New York of the "Quartet" of American, European Union, United Nations, and Russian officials. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has asked Syrian President Bashar Assad to be a major part of the meeting. (In today's Jerusalem Post it was stated that Israel's Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, in protest, yesterday canceled a visit to the US by two of his top aides and postponed a meeting between Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and Palestinian Authority negotiators.)

Then on Thursday at sunset the Fast of the 9th of AV will begin. The 9th of AV has been the day of catastrophe for Israel, the First and Second Temple were destroyed on that day (click here for a history on the 9th of AV http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Judaism/holidayd.html) along with many other critical events for the nation of Israel.

We know many people are praying for President Bush on many different fronts, but unless he changes his course on the covenant land of Israel, we are going to experience the fury of the Lord, and the resulting “tsunami” that is building in size and force will devastate the United States. That includes the nations of the world, as well as Israel and the United States. The Lord is no respecter of man, especially when it comes to something as precious to Him as the nation of Israel and His people.

I know for a fact that high profile Christian leaders (not from the replacement camp, either) have congratulated President Bush on his Middle East message. I am sure this probably gave the President a feeling of assurance on his course.

The reform and conservative Jews who make up eighty percent of Jewry are in favor of land being traded for peace. The Bush Administration is in pursuit of the Jewish vote in the upcoming election. With this in mind this (along with the promised cooperation of Israeli leadership), I’m afraid our president has been given a temporary, artificial sense of well being and the false assurance that he is on the right course . . . prior to our further demise.

Yes, the Lord has a plan in all of this. And, yes, life is certainly worsening in Israel as they hope for a peace settlement, but that too will prove futile until the return of the Messiah to the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem.

Obviously, we want God’s will through this, not our will, because we only have part of the picture. Respectfully, we should seek God’s will though this and pray accordingly. This is about souls, and we know many have come to know His Son Jesus Christ in recent times of hardship. These times and the future times will not be any different.

I sincerely sense these continued warnings will only be heard and not responded to by our leaders. However, at some point they will remember the warning calls; then our leaders will understand the importance of Israel, their people, and the significance of God’s covenant land. As we stated in our book, “Israel: The Blessing or the Curse,” God is using the nations of Israel as the anvil to expose false prophets, doctrines, and to have a literal witness on earth to the authority of His word.

We will continue to cry out to our leaders and the White House on the importance of not partaking in the “land for peace” calamity. It is my sincere conviction that, should they not respond, life will get even more intense for all of us in the days ahead.


TOPICS: Editorial; Israel
KEYWORDS: bush; godscovenantland; israel; judgement; us

1 posted on 07/15/2002 7:25:12 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
FYI
2 posted on 07/15/2002 7:27:03 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Let's talk about G-d's covenant with Abraham. Didn't G-d promise to Abraham's decendents all of the land to the Euphrates River?
3 posted on 07/15/2002 7:52:55 AM PDT by Dixie republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dixie republican
These were the promises that were included in the covenant God made with Abraham. Here is a list:

1. A great nation was to come out of Abraham, namely, the nation of Israel (Genesis 12:2; 13:16; 15:5; 17:1-2, 7; 22:17b)

2. Abraham was promised a land -- specifically, the Land of Canaan (Genesis 12:1, 7; 13:14-15, 17; 15:17-21; 17:8). Later we learn that the privilege of Abraham's descendants, the Jewish people, for living in their land under God's blessing is conditioned upon their obedience (see, for example, Deuteronomy 28-29). But whether the Jews are physically residing inside or outside of the land, or whether anyone else may control it by conquest or any other means, the land belongs to the Jewish people by divine right.

3. Abraham himself was to be greatly blessed (12:2b; 15:6; 22:15-17a)

4. Abraham's name would be great (12:2c)

5. Abraham will be a blessing to others (12:2d)

6. Those who bless will be blessed (12:3a)

7. The one who curses will be cursed (12:3b) -- again and again this principle is operative in the prophets as they pronounce judgment on the nations surrounding Israel for the treatment of His chosen people.

8. In Abraham all the earth will ultimately be blessed, a promise of Gentile blessing (12:3c; 22:18)

9. Abraham would receive a son through his wife Sarah (15:1-4; 17:16-21)

10. His descendants would undergo the Egyptian bondage (15:13-14)

11. Other nations as well as Israel would come forth from Abraham (17:3-4, 6; the Arab states are some of these nations)

12. His name was to be changed from Abram to Abraham (17:5)

13. Sarai's name was to be changed to Sarah (17:15)

14. There was to be a token/sign of the covenant -- circumcision (17:9-14).
4 posted on 07/15/2002 8:20:31 AM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
A whole lot of people believe that Abraham's decendents are more than the Jewish people. If his decendants are like the sand on the coast, wouldn't that be more than 13 million?
5 posted on 07/15/2002 8:39:19 AM PDT by Dixie republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
I meant the people of the covenent, are believed to be decended from the entire 12 tribes, and most of those are lost to history. Either way, G-d promises that his chosen will recieve all the land to the Euphrates.
6 posted on 07/15/2002 8:41:28 AM PDT by Dixie republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dixie republican
I recently read, (sorry I cannot quote source or guarantee accuaracy). "It is estimated that if the proportion of Jews in the world today was equivalent to the proportion at the time of The siege of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., there would be 200,000,000 million jews in the world today."
7 posted on 07/15/2002 9:07:53 AM PDT by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Radix
Pardon the redundancy, I am still learning how to post here.
8 posted on 07/15/2002 9:08:58 AM PDT by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Radix
See link of LostTribe's page.

http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/profile?u=22709
9 posted on 07/15/2002 11:08:34 AM PDT by Dixie republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dixie republican
The "Lost Tribes" were dispersed 700 yearse before that . Teh Jews of 70CE were Jews.
As for Lost Tribes theories, well other than lacking historical evidence, cultural evidence, or genetic evidence, it has a nice ring.
10 posted on 07/15/2002 3:59:43 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dixie republican
Nope, this is G_d's land.
11 posted on 07/15/2002 9:52:56 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Shalom & Blessings!

Truthandlife and ALL Freepers who Love and Support Israel.

This is an Excellent Article...Thank You for Posting it, and Thank You for Supporting Israel and God's Chosen People...

We Are The Apple Of HIS Eye!

Baruch HaShem, Amen & Amen.

12 posted on 07/15/2002 11:34:55 PM PDT by Simcha7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
What is "this"?
13 posted on 07/16/2002 7:13:28 AM PDT by Dixie republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
>As for Lost Tribes theories, well other than lacking historical evidence, cultural evidence, or genetic evidence, it has a nice ring.

Oh, c'mon Ron. We've been through all that. Just because YOU don't want to accept Biblical and Historic fact doesn't mean it isn't true. You just gotta open your eyes and believe what you see.

How do you like this market? Great for shorting, isn't it? I hardly have time for FR!

14 posted on 07/16/2002 11:00:35 AM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dixie republican
>...the people of the covenent, are believed to be decended from the entire 12 tribes, and most of those are lost to history.

Hello Dixie. To find the 12 Tribes of Israel simply Click on my FR Profile below and read the 3-MINUTE HISTORY. The "Lost Tribes" are MUCH too important to God to be lost, even tho some people want to make sure they are never found. (It's called "vested interest", among other things.)

15 posted on 07/16/2002 11:03:54 AM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dixie republican
>If his decendants are like the sand on the coast, wouldn't that be more than 13 million?

You're right. The "stars of the sky and sand of the sea" was the promise which applied to Israelites. The Southern Kingdom Israelites (as todays Jews) never reached great numbers. The Northern Kingdom Israelites became the Celts/Europeans/Americans and do fulfill that promise.

16 posted on 07/16/2002 1:37:53 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Radix
>if the proportion of Jews in the world today was equivalent to the proportion at the time of The siege of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., there would be 200,000,000 million jews in the world today.

Just offhand, those numbers sound pretty ambitious. Do you have the figure for the number of Jews in 70 AD as well as the global population?

If you check my Profile site under 3-MINUTE HISTORY you will see some population numbers for the Northern Kingdom, the Southern Kingdom, and the entire earth. The number of Jews who left the Babylonian captivity was only ~50,000.

17 posted on 07/16/2002 1:43:19 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LostTribe
"How do you like this market? Great for shorting, isn't it? I hardly have time for FR!"

I find it to be a little too volitile and irrational to play with shorts and derivatives.
Still, I am tempted to short every Arthur Anderson customer.


18 posted on 07/16/2002 3:24:19 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
>Still, I am tempted to short every Arthur Anderson customer.

Yep, at least it's nice to have a solid trend (as in "the trend is your friend" in play.

19 posted on 07/16/2002 3:29:35 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson