But what does John Loftus want to talk about? Getting the traitor Pollard out of prison and Nazis. Republicans and Nazis.
NAZIS ARE DEAD!
Well,most of them.The rest are in nursing homes.
Those who betrayed America to Soviet and Chinese communists are still running loose and doing damage.
If Loftus is really concerned about those who profited from the Nazis, why the silence about DeBeers? That company hurt America war production while either supporting or turning a blind eye to those who smuggled industrial diamonds to The Nazi war machine. WWII would have been over perhaps a year earlier had the Oppenheimer family prevented their diamonds from getting to Hitler. Why is that a taboo subject with John Loftus but what the Bush family did 60 years ago is of great interest?
Is THAT why you're posting from blue-hair-land, "Voegelin"?
Now, wait a minute.
That's the second time you brought that up, I can send you the link to the show on the archives, and you will not hear any of that.
Now, you WILL hear the discussion about the President's grandfather and great-grandfather, but he never tied it to the Republicans. He never made a connection between Bush 42 or Bush 43 and Nazi's.
I'll go back over the show and listen to it, but I don't think I missed it.
Understand something, in a way, I have to let you guys out there carry the water, I bring the guests on, and I bring the subjects to surface...that's when you should have kicked in, like Bryan did. If I attack guests whose opinions I do not agree with, it will become more and more difficult to get controversial guests on.
Bryan kept asking for some sort of solid proof, and while Loftus kept insinuating that being in the position that they were in, the Bush's would have known about the money transactions, we all know that's not enough to try anyone, specially for treason, and he couldn't provide any proof.
There will be a second Loftus show.
Be awake next time.
Pollard pleaded guilty in a plea bargain which the Judge ignored due to a submission by Casper Weinberger. Weinberger's "secret memorandum" convinced the Judge of the "irreperable" damage of the information passed on to the Soviets. But, it wasn't Pollard who passed that info but Aldrich Ames who in turn set up Weinberger to deflect suspicion from himself.
Because Pollard pleaded guilty there was no evidence ever presented as to what he actually did. The charge against him did not included anything in regard to the Soviets so your statement is pure conjecture. See HERE