Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Room And Life Enough For All
Fox News ^ | July 18, 2002 | Rand Simberg

Posted on 07/18/2002 9:03:50 PM PDT by NonZeroSum

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:34:13 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The story of the recent death and

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: cryonics; earthresources; exploration; immortality; livingforever; space
A different take on the Ted Williams story.
1 posted on 07/18/2002 9:03:50 PM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; Centurion2000; ...
Ping...
2 posted on 07/18/2002 9:52:32 PM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
That's good. Plant them on the moon. Remember how the Indians taught the Pilgrims how to grow corn by putting a fish in the hole with each seed for fertilizer. Soon as we get enough fertilizer buried on the moon, we can have a righteous garden up there.
3 posted on 07/18/2002 9:58:46 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
But for a Leonardo or Leonarda da Vinci, a lifetime of centuries might still seem all too brief.

The ideas lag a bit behind, you know. The future will be sexless.

4 posted on 07/19/2002 7:25:22 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
The future will be sexless? Really? Tell me more, O Great Prognosticator.

So Aztecs did invent the vacation? Dogs fly spaceships? And men and women are the same sex? Everything I know is wrong?

My future won't be sexless, if I have anything to say about it. You enjoy yours...

5 posted on 07/19/2002 8:57:31 AM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
The mundane policy for a sexless society: They let the old die off.

The post-millenial policy: sexless life is better after death.

6 posted on 07/19/2002 9:20:42 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
And a sexful life is better than a sexless one. Why would the people of the future choose the latter? You make no sense.
7 posted on 07/19/2002 12:07:13 PM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
I am not the promoter of either one. Modes of contentment vary throughout the ages and the species.
8 posted on 07/19/2002 1:47:50 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
What feats of baseball prowess has his son exhibited that demonstrates a great value for the DNA of Ted Williams?
9 posted on 07/19/2002 1:53:33 PM PDT by goo goo g'joob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goo goo g'joob
What does his son have to do with the value of Ted William's DNA? And this isn't about preserving DNA--it's about preserving Ted Williams.
10 posted on 07/19/2002 2:00:19 PM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
What does his son have to do with the value of Ted William's DNA?

I believe the initial motivation was to preserve "the Splendid Splinter" for DNA harvesting. It was even proposed that they could preserve only his head.

What I was suggesting is that Ted's son (DNA recipient) was a marketing liability for the claim that Ted's DNA will produce the next .400 hitter.

11 posted on 07/22/2002 9:12:39 AM PDT by goo goo g'joob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goo goo g'joob
I believe the initial motivation was to preserve "the Splendid Splinter" for DNA harvesting. It was even proposed that they could preserve only his head.

No. That's what the sister says, but it's not why people are cryonically suspended. Only the head is preserved because it's cheaper, and the assumption is that whatever technology can repair the damage of cryonics can also grow a new body onto the head. It has nothing to do with DNA harvesting.

What I was suggesting is that Ted's son (DNA recipient) was a marketing liability for the claim that Ted's DNA will produce the next .400 hitter.

Only to people ignorant of basic genetics. The son only has half his father's DNA. Unless his mother was also a great ballplayer (and if we ignore regression toward the mean as well) there's no reason to suppose that he would have gotten the baseball genes. His son's baseball ability is is utterly irrelevant to the value of Ted Williams' DNA, which in turn is utterly irrelevant to the reason that he's being frozen.

12 posted on 07/22/2002 11:31:42 AM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson