[justshe]

**** scapering hoves --goats --little hoved friends --slither back into your crevices --callaced hind side of yours --slandering and slobering --bunch of bozos --the brown stuff behind the ears ****

In all of the discussions I have seen on the threads re: Judicial Watch and Larry Klayman, I have only seen the critics question corporate legal success or lack thereof, corporate officer motivations, corporate finances, actual press releases, IRS audit issues, and advisability of certain lawsuits.

What, may I ask, do the invectives listed on your post (see above) add to the general discussion?

The worst I have seen from the critics, re: individual posters supportive of Larry, is a questioning of the seemingly blind obedience they have to Larry and JW, which, at times, precludes honest dialogue.

Your use of derisive comments is something I except to see from someone who cannot engage in honest dialogue and thus must fall back on schoolyard name calling. You dishonor yourself, imo.

[DoughtyOne]

Thanks for the corrective measures. I'm sure you didn't see any name calling before I entered the thread. However, if you did trip over some of them, I suppose you found them rather timely and astute. I would suggest that folks offer up the reasons for their name calling rather than the baseless opinions that resulted from those reasons. It would be far more productive. We might even get a dialogue started on the merits of the charges against Larry. Heaven forbid.

[deport]

Actually this is a case where 'eww' may have a chance to do something to a final conclusion..... It's civil and he can follow it to completion win or lose. He won't have to depend upon some other entity to follow through on his findings. So he will sink or swim upon his own abilities.

But a press release to say that the court didn't throw out his plaintiff's case on a motion to dismiss by the defendants.... that's really laughable imo. Did he expect it to get thrown out? If so then why did he file it?

[an amused spectator]

I guess you haven't read some of the Klayman threads from the wayback machine. I've often wondered why some of the posters verbally puke on Klayman and JW. If they think he's a fraud, they're welcome not to contribute. The sliming reminds me of Team Clinton.

DoughtyOne is spot-on with his post. This is similar to the whole history of Free Republic. We document this stuff, and the mainstream ignores it. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist. ;-)