Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Brady's gun gift
Jewish World Review ^ | 8/2/02 | Marianne M. Jennings

Posted on 08/02/2002 4:53:45 AM PDT by rhema

Sarah Brady, wife of former Reagan press secretary, Jim Brady, and founder of Handgun Control, Inc., disclosed in her new autobiography that she purchased a gun for her son for Christmas 2000, a .30-06 bolt-action rifle, complete with scope. She allows that she felt funny driving home packing heat.

The gun she gave to her son is one she and her antigun cronies demonized as a "sniper rifle." How ironic that some of the legislation she and HCI have proposed would have made it a crime for her to put the gun under the tree without transfer papers and prior approval from the Feds, Mrs. Claus, and Rudolph (a PETA effort).

Two things keep conservatives going through the barrage of disdain they endure as they defend the right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment and the myriad of other nerdy causes they espouse which emit snootiness. Conservatives can peel away the "Give peace a chance" layers of pseudo-intellectualism and see two things: data and human nature. Guns are inextricably intertwined with both.

Data show that when you don't have guns, you have trouble. Europe is the current proving ground. Over the past year there have been 3 shootings on the cosmopolitan continent that surpassed our Columbine. Sixteen people were gunned down at a German high school in April, 14 lawmakers were shot in Switzerland in September 2001, and 8 city council members were killed near Paris in March 2002.

Euros, who usually cannot click their tongues sufficiently to express disgust at us and our guns, whether they are hunting Osama in Afghanistan or ducks in Connecticut, and who have Utopia in terms of gun control legislation, have a problem. Britain banned handguns on 1996, and its gun crimes rose 40% in that same time frame. Austria banned the use of guns, even in self-defense, and its armed robberies are up 51%. Edelweiss!

Europe is a percolating mess. European nations fell for the sixties social policies hook, line and sinker. They went with free love, in fact, free everything. Without conservatives nipping at their heels and yelping about rule of law and morality, Europe became nonjudgmental central. Europeans cannot bring themselves to condemn the 9-11 attacks on the U.S. They are fit to be tied over Israel's retaliation against the suicide bombers. They grant absolute rights without moral absolutes.

The result is a lawless culture that criminalizes speech, bans guns and wonders why urban crime is out of control. Holland prohibits hate speech in its constitution, has disarmed its citizens and now, having disarmed tongue and self, stands defenseless as an increasing population of radical Islamic immigrants runs rampant through urban areas. Crime-loving immigrants have taken over inner cities and produced a crime rate that has Dutch citizens looking for gun-toting, candid-speaking "extreme right" candidates.

The French nearly sputtered up their foie gras truffe when they realized that "extreme right" Jean-Marie Le Pen took 25% of the vote in the recent national election. The socialist and Communist elite feel the outrage and backlash from unemployed blue-collar workers who live unarmed among the crime and criminals. "People feel unsafe in the streets," was the platform of one "extreme right" candidate for the National Assembly, (label courtesy the New York Times, an international conservative basher).

One Berlin paper, startled at the movement wrote, " Whether Norway, Denmark, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Portugal, France, Belgium or now Holland, everywhere the right-wing populists are on the march." Oh, how people speak when they regret lost rights.

Gun control is not such a hot idea when you're living in an urban area overrun by crime, particularly by young hostile males as dangerous as elk in search of a hook-up. The savvy Euros are weaponless, both in arms and tongue. Having taken politically correct speech to the point of making discouraging and disparaging words a crime, few dare mention the immigrant crime problem. Guns fire one way - at the silenced law-abiding citizens. Criminalize guns and, as the bumper sticker goes, only the criminals have guns. The conservative vision embodies prevention via strength. Weapons worked to bring down the Iron Curtain. Gun strength among the citizenry deters crime.

Mark these European events well. Watch these mighty foreshadowings of things that could across the Atlantic. Euros have sophisticated themselves into a defenseless corner. They now do what Sarah Brady and others of the enlightenment always do when human nature kicks in - they return to conservative views and policies. Embarrassing though it may be, conservative opposition to disarming citizens keeps the peace.

Our Euro brethren and sisters have always been ahead of the curve, as they are now. Their lack of weapons finds them defenseless and angry with gun-toting criminals. Take note and prepare to thank a conservative - human nature will soon arrive from the continent


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; sarahbrady; secondamendment

1 posted on 08/02/2002 4:53:46 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
BUMP
2 posted on 08/02/2002 4:57:32 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Sarah Brady is a hypocrite and an opportunist. Marianne Jennings, however, is a clear-headed editorialist who has nailed the Euro-weenies hide to the wall. An excellent editorial that shines the light of truth on European continent's decline to another Dark Age.
3 posted on 08/02/2002 5:00:46 AM PDT by ladtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
In order to rule, the order-givers need thug-enforcers who can be recruited to keep the producers/taxpayers in line. Ideally, the thug-enforcers should be from a group that has no connection to, or affinity towards, the producer class, and should enjoy violence

In Europe, the muslim immigrants seem an ideal choice for the thug-class, whenever the elites decide to take the gloves off.

4 posted on 08/02/2002 5:25:42 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
"Mark these European events well. Watch these mighty foreshadowings of things that could across the Atlantic. Euros have sophisticated themselves into a defenseless corner."

The Euro-wussies are a lost cause. They've sophisticated themselves into a defenseless corner, but they're too stupid to ever realize it!

5 posted on 08/02/2002 5:36:53 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema; dd5339
Guns? What guns, officer? All I got's this here shovel...I'll whang 'em over the head wi' it!


Hehehe...
6 posted on 08/02/2002 6:58:33 AM PDT by Vic3O3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema

7 posted on 08/02/2002 7:15:26 AM PDT by two23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
I have always felt sorry for Sarah Brady, she became a pathatic figure when she acted out of emotion. Hurt & angry over her husbands shooting, instead of trying to arm people to protect themselves, she tried to disarm them to protect them. Criminals are opportunist & that was the opportunity they needed.
8 posted on 08/02/2002 7:46:43 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
There is a small yet powerful ray of hope here, though. Sarah has lung cancer. Its' just a matter of time.

P.S. I don't think she is even suing the cigarette manufacturers for her cancer-for making her smoke- yet she advocates suing gun manufacturers, I just can't figure her out.

9 posted on 08/02/2002 10:14:21 AM PDT by mn_b_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mn_b_one
I don't think she is even suing the cigarette manufacturers for her cancer-for making her smoke-

Good point. But there are many people out there suing the cigarette companies or governments taxing them to death.

Too bad her zeal was not channelled to a real good cause that would improve our quality of life instead of diminishing it. What a waste.

10 posted on 08/02/2002 11:12:47 AM PDT by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Its is only a matter of time before these people start suicide bombing when they don't get their way.
11 posted on 08/02/2002 11:31:16 AM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mn_b_one
Oh come on! Give Sarah a break. I don't like her politics any more then you do, but I wouldn't wish lung cancer on anyone save Al-Qaeda members. They could all die miserably and slowly for all I care. After all, but her husband was almost killed. She should have gotten over it by now though.
12 posted on 08/02/2002 12:50:10 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oyez
Here's an informed comment.
13 posted on 08/02/2002 12:50:43 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
I wish death to anyone who actively fights to abridge our most important civil liberties.

The flowers on her grave will not go unirrigated or unfertilized.
14 posted on 08/03/2002 6:15:43 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I never felt sorry for Sarah Brady---her husband was in the wrong place, wrong time, even though the attack was aimed a President Reagan---however, her husband got the best of care and the average citizen probably would not be still alive---soo, she takes her spite, hatred, etc. out on all Americans by selling her soul and parading her poor husband around for her personal "moment in the sun" with the 'gun control' liberals who would destroy this Nation and send it back to the 'dark days' of pre American history when the common man had NO defense against the Kings and Dictators of the world and owning personal arms was an automatic 'death sentence---feel sorry for her,no way, only disgust!!
15 posted on 08/03/2002 6:44:21 PM PDT by cmotormac44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Sarah Brady is the enemy. To defeat an enemy, hate must be present. We hated the Japanese in WW2. We hated the Germans in WW2. My fathers commanding officer commented to him while on a convoy in through a German town in 1961 that the last time he had been on a convoy through that town, they were running over the bodies of dead Germans in the street. His comments were something like "last time I rode through this town, we were running over the dead b******ds".

America has lost the ability to hate. We will lose the war on terror for this reason. It is the same reason we did not win in Vietnam. We killed "innocent" people (women and children) in Japan, we won the war. We killed innocent people(women and children) in Germany. We won the war. When we set down rules that say we can't bomb certain areas (Hanoi), or we cannot kill civilians, we have lost. ONLY can we win when the enemy is completely destroyed, and the masses of the enemy can no longer stand the stench of death, and the spirit of the country is broken into unconditional surrender can there ever be a victory. We will certainly lose the war on terror because we no longer have the desire to destroy. Our way of life is drawing to a close, because of this. Sarah Brady is the enemy to my way of life. Sarah Brady is my enemy. I will not give her a break. Ever.

16 posted on 08/04/2002 8:05:39 PM PDT by mn_b_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mn_b_one
"America has lost the ability to hate. We will lose the war on terror for this reason. It is the same reason we did not win in Vietnam. We killed "innocent" people (women and children) in Japan, we won the war. We killed innocent people(women and children) in Germany. We won the war. When we set down rules that say we can't bomb certain areas (Hanoi), or we cannot kill civilians, we have lost. ONLY can we win when the enemy is completely destroyed, and the masses of the enemy can no longer stand the stench of death, and the spirit of the country is broken into unconditional surrender can there ever be a victory. "

Interesting. I hadn't thought about it that way. You're right how people have lost the ability to hate. I work in NYC and already I'm starting to forget about 9-11. One isn't reminded of the fact. Learned individuals, I think, really lose that capacity quickly. I honestly do not think we will win the war on terror either. Not because of a lack of courage on the part of average Joes and Janes. The soldier, sailor, Marine, etc. will fight couragously. It's our spineless leaders and academics that will lose us this war.

17 posted on 08/05/2002 5:47:19 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson