But soldiers also are more than pleased with the performance of other weapons, such as the M-240B machine gun, which won a 100 percent vote of confidence overall.
Posted on 08/04/2002 11:27:23 AM PDT by demlosers
Part one of two
ARLINGTON, Va. — Army infantry troops deployed to Afghanistan are struggling to keep weapons clean and in good working order, with soldiers particularly concerned about the maintainability and reliability of the M-4 carbine and the squad automatic weapon, according to an Army report on lessons learned in Afghanistan.
But soldiers also are more than pleased with the performance of other weapons, such as the M-240B machine gun, which won a 100 percent vote of confidence overall.
And troops often described a love-hate relationship with the same weapon, such as the soldier who called his squad automatic weapon the “perfect weapon for war” but added that it “does not work well in sand and dirt — it could be smaller and lighter.”
The assessments are part of a “lessons learned” report generated in April by Natick Soldier Systems Center, Natick, Mass.
A team from Natick’s Operational Forces Interface Group asked 200 Afghanistan combat veterans questions not only about weapons, but also clothing, food, boots and other standard-issue items at the suggestion of Command Sgt. Major Vincent Myers of the Coalition Forces Land Component Command, Southwest Asia.
In Afghanistan visiting troops who had fought in Operation Anaconda in March, Myers “had some observations about what soldiers were wearing and not wearing” in the cold-weather, high-altitude conditions, according to Lt. Col. Charlie Dean, director of operations and customer interface at Natick’s Soldier Systems Center.
Myers called Natick’s hot line (DSN 256-5341) with his comments, which Natick forwarded to U.S. Central Command in Tampa, Fla., Dean said in a Thursday telephone interview.
In turn, CENTCOM asked Natick to send a team to Afghanistan to canvass deployed infantry soldiers regarding their equipment, including all platoon-level small arms, and report back with the findings.
Soldiers participating in the survey included Operation Anaconda participants from the 101st Airborne Division’s 1-187th Infantry, 3rd Brigade in Kandahar, as well as soldiers who had participated in the battle from the 10th Mountain Division’s 1-87th Infantry, who already had returned to Fort Drum, N.Y., when the Natick team talked to them, Dean said.
According to the report, “weapons basically performed well in Afghanistan, although there were some issues worth noting.”
The majority of weapons problems soldiers reported had to do with difficulties keeping their weapons clean and operating in Afghanistan’s austere environment — a problem some soldiers said was made worse because the Army’s standard-issue kits contain insufficient cleaning supplies.
In the Natick survey, soldiers routinely reported having to purchase their own weapons cleaning kit items (in many cases asking friends and family to send them from home). Thirty-five percent of soldiers surveyed added barber brushes and 24 percent added dental picks to the cleaning kits issued to support the M-4 carbine, which is the infantry’s compact version of the M-16 rifle.
Other weapons problems arose in Afghanistan because replacement parts weren’t readily available, soldiers said.
For example, nearly half of soldiers on M-240 Machine Gun teams indicated they had problems getting spare or replacement parts in Afghanistan, with shortages of extra barrels, springs, small roll pins, traverse and elevating pins, heat shields, sear pins, spare barrel bags and cleaning materials.
Meanwhile, nearly half of the machine gunners “also noted that they have problems carrying ammunition and that they need they need improved ammunition bags,” the report said. The soldiers who carry the M-240 also suggested an improved sling for the weapon that could be disconnected quickly.
Problems keeping weapons clean apparently prevented soldiers from feeling certain that the arms would work when called upon to do so. While 89 percent of soldiers polled said they had “confidence” in the M-4 carbine, only 77 percent felt it was reliable.
Soldier comments indicated that the discrepancy reflected how much time troops had to adequately clean and service their weapons.
“If I did not have so many opportunities to clean [my M-4] I’m not sure how reliable it would have been,” one soldier commented.
But of all the weapons surveyed, the squad automatic weapon — a gas-operated, man-portable automatic weapon that can deliver up to 750 rounds per minute at ranges up to 800 meters — was unique in its ability to inspire both praise and blame from the same soldier.
“I’m sure it’s great when new, but gets worse over time,” one soldier said.
Another SAW gunner called it “big and heavy, but this is the weapon to be behind in a combat situation.”
The SAW’s record in combat also was spotty: Three out of the seven soldiers who reported engaging enemy targets with the SAW said the weapon malfunctioned in combat.
As with other weapons surveyed, the misfires may have been related to the reports by half of the SAW gunners that they had trouble cleaning or maintaining the weapon.
The most common problems were rust, dust and dirt accumulation, and trouble getting into many spots to clean them adequately.
Meanwhile, of the 28 SAW gunners surveyed by the Natick staff, half were satisfied that the weapon was “reliable,” but even more, 64 percent, had “confidence” in the gun — just one of the puzzling mismatches that caught the attention of the Natick researchers.
Soldier comments on the SAW “are hard to categorize … because they truly are ambivalent,” the report noted.
For example, the weapon got fairly good marks for lethality (79 percent said it was lethal) and accuracy (82 percent said it was accurate), but miserable marks for both ease of handling (32 percent approved) and ease of maintenance (15 percent said yes).
Not everyone was wishy-washy about the weapon.
“It’s big, awkward, [and the] drums fall off,” one soldier said. “Replace it.”
The M-203, on the other hand, got excellent reviews. The M-203 is a single-shot, 40 mm grenade launcher with an effective range of 350 meters that is designed to fix directly to both the M-16 rifle and the M-4 carbine.
Half of the soldiers surveyed said they had used their M-203s to engage the enemy in Afghanistan, using it to attack personnel, buildings, bunkers and vehicles.
Some soldiers suggested improvements to the launcher, including adding buckshot rounds to its arsenal of munitions. Other soldiers asked for a better safety switch, a non-slip grip on the hand guard, and a 40 mm muzzle cap, which would help keep the launcher clean when not in use.
The M-4 carbine prompted less applause, with “a sizable percentage” of soldiers who said they either were unhappy with the weapon, or toting it without much thought one way or another.
“While the majority were satisfied with the M-4 carbine in terms of ease of maintenance, lethality and range, those characteristics [also] had a sizeable percentage who felt neutral or dissatisfied,” the report said.
Out of 54 soldiers surveyed on the M-4, 27 stated that their M-4 carbine has malfunctioned, although Dean noted that the question was not specific to Afghanistan.
The most common problems were double feeds, feeding jams, rounds that failed to chamber and misfeeds.
The M-4 “gets dirty fast for a self-cleaning weapon, also double feeds when rounds get wet,” one soldier said in the survey.
And about one-third, or 18 of the soldiers, reported that the hand guards rattle on the M-4, and six soldiers noted that the weapon’s hand guards get uncomfortably hot while firing.
Natick has sent the results of the report to more than two dozen offices, including Army headquarters at the Pentagon, the Defense Supply Center in Philadelphia, the Army’s new Program Executive Office Soldier at Fort Belvoir, Va., and the Army’s Program Management for Small Arms at Picatinny Arsenal, N.J., which is responsible for research and development efforts for all the weapons listed in the study.
Army officials at the various centers now are reviewing the study, comparing reported problem areas with comments that already have been collected in other Natick studies, which number in the dozens each year, said David Nelson, deputy project manager for soldier equipment at PEO Soldier, in a telephone interview.
In the case of weapons, Army officials at PM Small Arms next will cross-check their lists of ongoing improvement projects — for example, an improved ammunition bag for the machine gun is almost completed — and then decide whether new studies should be funded, Nelson said.
You're not grabbing it- you're pushing against it. And keep in mind, I don't have any idea if it works with other automatics.
Pushing straight against the barrel of the 9mm Military sidearm, pushes the barrel backwards- towards the hammer. Somehow, it moves the slide just enough so the trigger- hammer mechanism doesn't function. If you have a 9mm like the one the military uses, give it a try (unloaded of course). If you push against the business end of the barrel- that is, if the gun were pointed at you and you stuck out your palm (in a "halt" posture), placed your palm straight against the barrel and pushed directly against it- you can actually see it interferes with it. It pushes the hammer back a little bit further than it's supposed to be- whatever it does, it prevents the weapon from discharging (no matter how hard the guy squeezes the trigger) as long as you have it pushed back.
If you were quick enough, I suppose you could unlatch his magazine and then if you could force him to discharge his one remaining round, he'd be screwed. I found just using that method to push the barrel away from my torso/head and then using my free hand to strike seemed to be a pretty good tactic- assuming the guy was going to kill you anyway, having a hole in the hand is definitely better than one in the gut and the worst that happens is you're not quick enough and he plugs you anyway.
If you can, try it out safely. If you don't have one (9mm), go to a pawn shop or a gun show and see if you can find that model and give it a try. The magazine doesn't have to be in it. Try it either way, hammer cocked or hammer down. I don't know how to describe why the hammer can't be released, but it's like it's pinching it/putting it in a position where the trigger doesn't work. But you're right, if you didn't ID the gun correctly, you'd be screwed. We figured it would actually only be useful against another US Soldier because the probability would be highly in your favor that it would be a 9mm (against the MPs maybe?)
This SGT friend of mine says "you know, if you push against the barrel of the 9mm, it won't fire". I say, "No sh!t?" So we PLAYED around with it. It was for sh!ts and giggles- to pass the time you know?
I only brought it up to point out that the military 9mm, won't fire in this situation. I've got better things to do with my time than go to a combat school or karate class. Jeez, lighten up.
My own suggestion would be to go to an AK type weapon. With one M-14 per fire team, for long-distance work.
If that is too complicated, then just bring back the M-14.
Sigh.......
The M16 probably needs to Move On... But, it's just too bad Stoner and Kalashnikov aren't around any more, now that the Cold War is over. We could just give the two of them a billion-dollar budget and tell them to agree on a solution to all our problems.
Grip, barrel, switch -
It's just curiousity mainly. It was a fun way to spend a few hours in Bosnia but it's not really knowledge I can apply nowadays but I found it to be a bit of a novelty at the time.
But that's just MHO.
What are they teaching these Army guys? "Self-cleaning weapon?"
MikTim [Mikhail Timofey'vich] Kalashnikov is alive and well, and continues to maintain his position as dean of Russian firearms design engineers as a consultant to the Russian Izmash-avto arms factory at Izhevsk.
Their video demonstration [to accompaniment of Bach's tocatta and fugue in D minor!] of their most famous product is enlightening and entertaining. Try it sometime with an M16 or M4.
But that's just MHO.
Not quite. The purpose of the *barrel safety* [properly called the disconnector is twofold: to prevent the pistol from discharging unless the breech is in the locked position with the cartridge fully seated, since an out-of-battery discharge could rupture the brass cartridge case and injure the shooter, and to prevent unwanted full-automatic fire by requiring a seperate press of the trigger for each shot.
Note that such a feature is hardly limited to the M9, which certainly has its faults, though the presence of a disconnector safety is hardly one of them. It's one of the safety features of the earlier M1911A1 .45 autopistol as well, which, by the way can also be slapped in the muzzle to prevent it's firing, unless, of course, the shooter simply pulls his elbow back a few inches, in which case the result is a muzzle-contact .45 wound. Messy.
Been there, got the T-shirt, and had to have it professionally cleaned...repeatedly....
The technique we teach in bando is somewhat different:
Immediate horizontal level slash opens opponents throat, windpipe and maybe carotid artery, sometimes decapitating him, or at least severing neck muscles to the spine. Turn of wrist and downward diagonal cut likely breaks clavicle [collarbone] rendering strength of pistol hand useless, and opening pectoral muscles of chest during followthrough. Ow. Final third stroke is again a weak-to-strongside horizontal cutopening stomach cavity and probably disemboweling recipient. Entire three-motion Z-cut takes less than a second to execute, with practice, and results in massive shock to opponent, and big wide-opened surprise look in their eyes.
You can do pretty well with a field shovel or intrenching tool, as well.
Ayo Ghorkhali!
Well, good! I needed a pleasant surprise for a change.
I could have sworn I'd heard on separate occasions that both he and Stoner had passed away.
And I'm still kicking myself roundly for not having found a way to catch the two of them on their NRA-sponsored tour a few years back. (I'd love to get a video...)
LOL! That would work.
But yes, he met with MikTim at one of the SHOT show gatherings before his demise, arranged by Ed Ezell of the Smithsonian, and there's a highly appropriate photo of the two of them then you might especially appreciate, holding not their own rifle designs, but the others.
Certainly gets their undivided attention! But sometimes ruins the shoeshine, and usually gets you off their next Christmas card list....
GI field shovel [*Omon nightstick*] is still an appropriate alternate, though. Versatile.
-archy-/-
I'm not even gonna ask how you acquire a supply of practice partners!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
