Paper: Muslims draft 'hit list' of leading Danish Jews

HaaretzDaily.com ^ | August 18, 2002 | By Yair Sheleg

[DonQ]

I think this pretty much debunks the Arab claim that they're not out to kill Jews, but only "Zionists" or only "settlers". Or their claim that if Jews leave the Holy Land the nastiness will stop.

[GaryMontana]

I was scheduled for my sensitivity training on 9/11 but when we all watched the Palesitian parasites celebrating the death of Americans on 9/12 the class was permanently canceled.

[weikel]

Really. How long did the treaty last?

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

AND. To the Bush administration and the American people: WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE! THE OUTRAGE!!!

I'll tell you what. When this shit starts happening here, I'LL BE READY, YOU CAN COUNT ON THAT! Violent Muslims beware.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Interesting. That's the same tactic Hitler applied to the Serbs in WW2...

OK. 1,000 violent muslims for every Jew. OK? for me, I would prefer 10,000 violent muslems for every Jew. But hey. I can be reasonable.

[Nachum]

I know Irv Rubin. He is a lot more practical. He would just transfer them all.

[Nachum]

The poor sot. They set him up like a bowling pin.

[Nachum]

Who? The powerful Jews here in L.A.. Irv is the scapegoat to prove they are fair.

He is an easy target. Just a big mouth that always seems to insult just about everyone. I am sure, what ever the "evidence", he will be convicted and spend some quality time in prison.

Getting rid of Irv killed two birds with one stone. They got rid of an irritant and offered the Muslims in L.A. a scapegoat.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Are you sure you're not Irv Rubin? :)

Sorry. No cigar for you. But I appreciate your suggestion as a positive referendum vis my latest rants. But killing the bad guys has been a princple of human interaction for, shall we agree, quite some time. Although might has made right for most of human experience, there has also been a trajectory of right making good, would'nt you also agree? I might not have agreed with all of Rubin's actions and targets. But in the current scenario, ruthless action seems to be rightly prescribed.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Does either side actually want peace?

You are correct. Clear victory (or surrender by one side) is a necessary prerequisite for peace. The main problem is that there have been too many interferers. In most historical conflicts, the situation is resolved by a victory of one side over the other as you suggest. The problem here is that when you have interference by heavyweight players (USA, Europe, etc.), the situation becomes politicized and thus it is dragged out. The best recourse would be for the others to stand aside. But that will not happen. This is unfortunate, because the Israelis want peace and stability, and the Arabs want insurrection and war, and the war fever of the Arabs will not be spent, as it should be in defeat.

[jackliberty]

It said it did not know who was responsible for drafting the list...

Read the Holy Qur'an

[LenS]

That nasty tactic worked. It wasn't until the Red Army came along that Yugoslavia traded dictators.

[Guillermo]

If you have to tag it, it ain't it.