Posted on 09/05/2002 10:58:15 AM PDT by buzzyboop
Agreed. This dolt is trying to turn a freedom of association issue into a racial discrimination issue where there is none to be found.
Besides, if I, as a private citizen wants to make a private organization totally funded by private dollars to include anyone by whatever criteria I want, I have that right as my First Amendment right that is PROTECTED (NOT GRANTED) by the US Constitution.
Lets see. I think I'll start an organization that includes everyone except for scum named Martha Burk and Jason Whitlock (Witless).
Let me qualify...I was cheering at the first half of it...then he started down the road that culminated in "Uncle Thomas."
Exactly. He takes the the high road and essentially says that "racial discrimination"(against minorities, presumably) is the "ultimate" discrimination, and that can not be tollerated, and all other groups can stand in line behind us.
It's kind of like the scene from the movie "PCU" where the gays, radical feminists and radical blacks are arguing who should be first in line at the frat party. The black guy says, "There is no justice for blacks in America"; the queer says, "Gays are subject to ridicule and discrimination whereever we go"; and the butch feminists says, "Women are oppressed word-wide, give it a rest".
Now, THAT is a funny visual!
"We don't even send a double agent, a Bryant Gumbel."
Gumbel is a double agent??? Damn, I was fooled. What agency is he really working for?
" We're more than happy if every Augusta Shoal Geek Golf Club had a couple of Uncle (Clarence) Thomases.
Ah yes, the ever present bashing of Supreme Court Justice Thomas as an "Uncle Tom". He doesn't even make BET's list of the most influential blacks in America.
" They have a constitutional right to assemble, regale each other with politically incorrect jokes and bitch about the money NBA players make."
How about we get some "diversity" on NBA teams. It seems to me they have way too many black players and maybe the NBA needs to implement affirmative action programs to correct this racist problem.
What's the use of being rich and bigoted, if you can't have a little harmless fun?"
Of course, ALL rich people are bigoted. I guess that includes Michael Jordan, Michael Jackson, Quincy Jones, Oprah Winfrey, Jesse Jackson, Wesley Snipes, ect....
Too bad that you're not a man, Jason "Whittle Wheenie" Whitlock. ;-)
I understand what you are saying, but the "big deal" is that this is in no way about "righting a wrong" or about someone being denied a right. This is simply another attempt of radical womynists trying to "kick men in the nuts" and show them "whos boss". This is another attack upon freedom of association. There aren't any women out there trying to get in to Augusta - no women wanting to be the only, or one of a few, in an all male club. There is not somebody wanting to "be a part of something", they want to destroy what someone else has. Its that simple, and the butch feminists finally picked the wrong people to mess with. Its time this nonsense stops.
Walter (E) Williams just wrote a column on freedom of association. His take is that you either support freedom of association totally, or that you totally throw it out. No cherry picking.
This article can be found on JewishWorldReview.com.
That is a great movie.
I would have to agree with you based on this article (although I enjoy his bashing of the strident nags). I've never heard his radio show, and I never read his column since the only thing I look at on the sports page is the weather.
I wonder if the Star would dare reprint this on their editorial page. It won't, but it is fun to think what would happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.