Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live on C-Span - House Armed Services Committee hears from former UN Weapons Inspectors

Posted on 09/10/2002 2:20:54 PM PDT by agrace

For the past half hour or so I have been watching two former UN weapons inspectors testify before the House Armed Services Committee live on C-Span. Is anyone else watching this? They are without a doubt making President Bush's case for him. They have stated unequivocally that time is not on our side, that if they held congressional voting cards (a question put to them by a Republican congressman from VA) that they would vote to invade, that Scott Ritter is a liar (quote - "if he isn't lying now, he was certainly lying years ago"), referencing his past statements before Congress. They stated disdainfully that Scott Ritter has no way of knowing ANYTHING past 1998.

They are emphatic, deadly serious and urgent in their answers to questions put forward by Republicans and Democrats alike. One thanked them a few minutes ago for appearing before them and speaking so candidly and "quite frankly, scaring us to death." It's still going on (unless it concluded within the last couple minutes). I did a search and found nothing about it - please direct me if I missed comments already made.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; saddamhussein; weaponsinspectors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Please forgive the vanity-ish post. But the content of the meeting is huge, imo.
1 posted on 09/10/2002 2:20:54 PM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: agrace

2 posted on 09/10/2002 2:23:15 PM PDT by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Whew! Listening to these guys.....

Kay and Spretzel make it clear; the threat is evident.
3 posted on 09/10/2002 2:23:15 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Yes, but are there any that are making the case agianst Bush, perhaps someone who is taking half a million in Iraqi money?
4 posted on 09/10/2002 2:23:17 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace
No apology required. I otherwise would have missed this.
5 posted on 09/10/2002 2:23:22 PM PDT by Orangedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace
They have stated unequivocally that time is not on our side, that if they held congressional voting cards (a question put to them by a Republican congressman from VA) that they would vote to invade, that Scott Ritter is a liar (quote - "if he isn't lying now, he was certainly lying years ago"), referencing his past statements before Congress.

Who are the former inspectors? Is Richard Boucher one of them, and did they really say that Ritter is a liar? I hope someone hands that backstabbing, treacherous a-hole his head one day soon. This latest stunt of his...speaking in Iraq...borders on treason. I put him right up there with Hanoi Jane.

6 posted on 09/10/2002 2:26:22 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samwise
The caroonist drew Saddam's arm too high behind the dummy's back...
7 posted on 09/10/2002 2:26:49 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Please forgive the vanity-ish post.

Please don't ever apologise again for bringing up breaking news. I hope no one reading this thread ever does either. This is what makes this forum great. Good work! Hope it is in the 'breaking news' side bar. Freegards....

8 posted on 09/10/2002 2:27:10 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace
They have stated unequivocally that time is not on our side, that if they held congressional voting cards (a question put to them by a Republican congressman from VA) that they would vote to invade, that Scott Ritter is a liar (quote - "if he isn't lying now, he was certainly lying years ago"), referencing his past statements before Congress. They stated disdainfully that Scott Ritter has no way of knowing ANYTHING past 1998.

I.E., the threat is imminent...

"Saddam, the tribe has spoken. It's time for you to go."

9 posted on 09/10/2002 2:27:31 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Ya know-it was years ago when I saw Scott Ritter sitting before a panel on CSPAN, an inquiry panel composed of senators. They were looking for responses to Saddams kicking UNSCUM-the UN led inspectors in IRAQ-out of his country, breaking a UN resolution to allow them access.

Scott RAILED against the UN and the klinton administration for not supporting the efforts of the investigators.

I remember joey biden, the pompous rather stupid dem senator really putting Scott down...saying "you DON't RIDE in LIMOS and make policy....you are out of line making such comments" or words to that effect. Scott was mocked by biden and a few others and you could see the anger boiling within Scott's self.

Scott's flip flop is strange and scary. And dangerous. But joey biden and other sick dems shoudl KNOW that their treatment of him may have encouraged Scott to go over the edge. Seriously.

I was HOPING that Brit Hume, Hannity and COlmes, O'Reilly and Rush would be playing the tapes from CSPAN library of Scott's time before the senatorial panel-it was, frankly, amazing.

I am so glad to learn that other, still patriotic investigators are now making the case Scott was, at one time, making himself.

10 posted on 09/10/2002 2:28:42 PM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
I think Ritter would definately fall under the "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" part of the law. Too bad no one at "Justice" has the stones to indict him.
11 posted on 09/10/2002 2:29:32 PM PDT by Orangedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
Kay and Spretzel. Kay is a former chief inspector, 91-93. I don't know anymore about them than what C-Span is posting. And yes, they DID call Ritter a liar. One of the congressmen (forget which one) asked them if they would care to address what Ritter has been saying and Kay said "Well, CARE isn't the word I would use" (showing obvious disgust for what Ritter's been saying) and he proceeded to say that if Ritter isn't lying now, he was lying years ago, and all they have to do was look at the statements he made before Congress then, statements that do NOT conflict with what they were saying now, today. He ended with "You make the decision" (about Ritter's truthfulness) and the other inspector concurred.
12 posted on 09/10/2002 2:30:57 PM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
The caroonist drew Saddam's arm too high behind the dummy's back...

I think there is too much middle eastern cash stuffed up that orafice for there to be room for Saddam's hand...but hey, I'm not opposed to seeing him try to make it fit!

13 posted on 09/10/2002 2:32:00 PM PDT by Orangedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Our beloved troops have been doing an awesome job of cutting off the fingers of Lucifer . . . now it's time to decapitate part of serpent’s head. Kill 'em all!
14 posted on 09/10/2002 2:32:24 PM PDT by w_over_w
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samwise; ohioWfan; Wphile; muggs; cyn; ELS; kristinn; AuntB; Wait4Truth; rintense; Fred Mertz; ...
GREAT CARTOON! PERFECT!!! Don't miss this one guys-post#2
15 posted on 09/10/2002 2:32:29 PM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: w_over_w
So is Osama Bin Ritter there?
16 posted on 09/10/2002 2:33:29 PM PDT by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March; Orangedog
Thanks to you both. I very rarely start threads so I was a bit tentative about posting something that consisted of only my own words. No, it's not in Breaking News, but I put it in Front Page.

Anyway, extremely compelling content - I had a hard time breaking away from the TV to post on FR.

17 posted on 09/10/2002 2:35:27 PM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
DOJ has opened an investigation into whether he is an "enemy agent." Per Fox News this morning.
18 posted on 09/10/2002 2:37:03 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
So is Osama Bin Ritter there?

Hard to say . . . maybe the guy is just emotionally retarded. IMHO.

19 posted on 09/10/2002 2:38:25 PM PDT by w_over_w
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: agrace
I watched this also........scared the SHI! outta me.

I loved the way that the older bioweapons expert guy, sorry can't remember his name, put that loud mouthed (D) in his place toward the end.

He said "What makes us so sure that Iraq hasn't already used BW against us?". He then said " We still haven't figured out the source of the Anthrax last year and Iraq CERTAINLY had the capability to make Anthrax of that quality".

MKM

20 posted on 09/10/2002 2:47:32 PM PDT by mykdsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson