Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mo1
Daschle wants to wait until after the election to hold this debate. No doubt Saddam supports that idea.
1,096 posted on 09/12/2002 9:17:54 AM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1065 | View Replies ]


To: Darlin'
Daschle wants to wait until after the election to hold this debate

So Tommy thinks we should raise taxes and sit back and wait to be nuked by a madman

Oh good plan you got there Tommy

1,106 posted on 09/12/2002 9:20:34 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1096 | View Replies ]

To: Darlin'
So Daschle thinks the elections are MORE important than our national security. About right?
1,110 posted on 09/12/2002 9:21:18 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1096 | View Replies ]

To: Darlin'
If Bush presents his case to a televised joint session of Congress, there is no way that Daschle can refuse a debate and vote on Iraq. If he does, he risks coming back after the mid-terms with about 7 fewer Democratic senators.

GWB has Daschle by the shorthairs. Every time Daschle delays or prevaricates, it helps ensure a GOP senate.

1,117 posted on 09/12/2002 9:23:39 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1096 | View Replies ]

To: Darlin'
Daschle wants to wait until after the election to hold this debate. No doubt Saddam supports that idea.

However, when Bush asks them to debate it (soon, probably), then Daschle's in a hole. He can't say yes, and he can't say no. He's simply squashed by events.

Any bets on when Bush asks?

1,207 posted on 09/12/2002 9:47:31 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1096 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson