To: Tunehead54
No party affiliation mentioned. Must be a dimocrat?Yes, he is.
4 posted on
09/17/2002 8:33:49 PM PDT by
Timesink
To: Timesink
"Yes, he is."
Do dims walk around with perpetual woodies?
13 posted on
09/17/2002 8:49:49 PM PDT by
lawdude
To: Timesink
To: CreekerFreeper No party affiliation mentioned. Must be a dimocrat?
3 posted on 9/17/02 11:29 PM Eastern by Tunehead54 [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] To: Tunehead54
No party affiliation mentioned. Must be a dimocrat?
Yes, he is.
4 posted on 9/17/02 11:33 PM Eastern by Timesink [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Hmmm ... several approaches available ... Ahh! Typical FReeper:
Thanks for the facts!
To: Timesink
I guess if he's a DemocRAT it must be O.K. After all, he supports abortion, right?
45 posted on
09/18/2002 9:38:24 AM PDT by
ZULU
To: Timesink
But he is a "KY Democrat," which in KY does not mean "LIBERAL," as the Kentuckians tell us. Republicans have not won the governorship since 1967. The last GOP governor was caught up in his own scandals and supported a Democrat plan to include grocery foods and prescription medicines in the state sales tax. Since then KY has said "No Thanks" to GOP gubernatorial nominees. A later Democrat governor (was it Julian Carroll?) got the tax on groceries and prescription drugs repealed. People in KY associate the Republicans with "the rich," when it comes to the governorship. In 1987, the Republican gubernatorial nominee, John Harper, actually ran on a platform of higher taxes and was crushed. KY even has a tax on one's out-of-state investment, paid to the county sheriff.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson