Gore Iraq Speech Could Galvanize Anti-War Forces - Zogby

Reuters ^ | September 24, 2002

[isthisnickcool]

(USING LISPY GIRLY FAG VOICE)

AL GORE: Uh, how does this thing work? Does this thing-a-ma-jig go here? Are we still out of bullets? Anyone heard from daddy? Can I go home now? I had room service at home!

[SierraWasp]

Yes... we were all told his speech was going to be titled: "A Common Ethic."

Which just proves what I've said for years: Clinton, Clinton & Gore, Inc. are nothing but "COMMONISTS!"

They really believe the US should not aspire, or acheive anymore greatness than the lowest turd whirled cuntry!!!

They really believe we have so much to feel guilty about!!!

[DaGman]

"Pollster John Zogby said Gore's message was "very well timed."

As a point of view from the opposition party, it was. No where does Zogby say he agrees with Gore. Zogby only speaks of the impact of Gore's statement and the effect it willl have on the Democratic party 2004 presidential candidates. That does not make him biased. In fact Zogby even spoke of the dangers to Democrats from opposing this war were similar to the political perils of opposing the Viet Nam war. He pointed out Nixon's trouncing of McGovern in 1972.

Had Zogby gone on to say something like, "...Gore's right and Bush is wrong because...", that would constitute bias.

[Richard Axtell]

All day yesterday and today, from neighbors, friends, co-workers, on talk radio, and from columnists, I have heard ta similar pronouncement, "Thank God Gore did not win the election!" This reaction says volumes about the real opinions of the American populace, and to what extent Zogby is fooling himself. To this I say, Amen.

[nopardons]

Try reading the article, before you post your opinion.

[Vets_Husband_and_Wife]

Sheesh!! You must REALLY be a fan of Gore and Zogby, because you are NOT COMPREHENDING what I've been trying to tell you.

READ THIS VERY SLOWLY.....

I GOT AN E-MAIL WHERE ZOGBY WAS BLASTING THE REPUBS/PRESIDENT BUSH AND BACKING UP THE DEMS. HE HAS BEEN ON TV ADMITTING HE IS LIBERAL "SINCE 9/11". WE CANCELLED OUR SUBSCRIPTION TO HIS ONLINE SERVICE, BECAUSE HE HAS STARTED TO EXPOSE HIS POLITICAL VIEWS. THAT, IN OUR OPINION, DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM BEING "UNBIASED" IN ANY DATA HE COLLECTS. THE ACCURACY IN ANY POLL IS "HOW" YOU ASK A POLLING QUESTION. I HAD POLLS WHERE HE WAS "WAY OFF" FROM OTHER POLSTERS WHO HAPPENED TO BE CORRECT (I WISH I HAD KEPT THE COMPARISONS, I DID NOT). HE IS LOSING HIS STATUS AS THE "BEST" POLSTER, IOHO!!

[Shermy]

Basically that's what I heard. A momentary "what's he talking about" and a move on, he's irrelevant.

Given, someone could make arguments against, that I probably disagree with, but would be coherent. Gore was just all over the place. For one, that whole "allies" business was raised months ago by the press, followed by the demos, and Bush responded with meetings with Blair, Putin, UN proposals, etc. etc. Gore sounded like non of this happened.

[Vets_Husband_and_Wife]

As of today, it would seem that Gore, Daschle and Gephardt have a plan. Do they really think we are all so stupid as to NOT SEE JUST WHO IS PLAYING POLITICS?

Amazing, huh?