Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In one sense, it is good for Saddam to think he can survive even if he loses as it may serve as somewhat of a deterent to use WMD. During Desert Storm he did not use these weapons for fear of the US response. If, however, he were to think that we weren't stopping until he was captured or dead than he might think he has nothing to lose this time around and use them.
1 posted on 09/27/2002 9:35:37 PM PDT by stilts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: stilts
“If he’s on the run, he’s not governing Iraq,”

If he's dead, he's not governing Iraq.

2 posted on 09/27/2002 9:37:54 PM PDT by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stilts; Landru; sultan88
Sodom shall be murdered by his own people, most likely carried out by a renegade faction within the Republican Guard...and little other blood will be lost in achieving the Iraqi Regime Change.

Quite Sincerely...MUD

3 posted on 09/27/2002 9:44:03 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stilts
The exile idea seems to be popping about lately.
4 posted on 09/27/2002 9:49:25 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stilts
Capturing the Saddam dog? What a waste of manpower!

We have newer, more smart weapons that will simply do this to him and his doubles, one at a time...:


5 posted on 09/27/2002 10:12:04 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stilts
The defence secretary said Saddam’s voluntary departure would be the preferred course.

Exile, that sounds good. But where? Hmmm, there are many tempting BLUE STATE locations, but I suggest the government buy him a house right next to Barbara Streisand.

Alternates include the following:
Berkeley, CA
Cambridge, MA
Paterson, NJ

6 posted on 09/27/2002 10:13:27 PM PDT by Norman Arbuthnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stilts
I'm hoping that someone in Saddam's cabinet is actually on our payroll, and once the attack starts he just caps old Saddam. We've got to get the sons as well as they are probably even more twisted than their father.
7 posted on 09/27/2002 10:15:17 PM PDT by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stilts
In one sense, it is good for Saddam to think he can survive even if he loses as it may serve as somewhat of a deterent to use WMD. During Desert Storm he did not use these weapons for fear of the US response.

You got that bass-ackwards. We didn't take him out, for fear of his response.

9 posted on 09/28/2002 12:32:55 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stilts; EternalHope; Travis McGee
Killing Saddam Hussein, or at very least bombing him out of his palaces and into hiding -- which would also achieve the stated aim of regime change -- is, militarily, a trivially easy task for the United States. The problem is, we are afraid of what will happen if we kill him. And no wonder:

THIS IS NEXT
WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX
YOU CAN NOT STOP US

10 posted on 09/28/2002 12:37:30 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson