Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RESIGNATION IS NOT ENOUGH!
JUDICIAL WATCH ^ | Sep 30, 2002 | © Copyright 1997-2002, Judicial Watch, Inc.

Posted on 09/30/2002 6:46:44 PM PDT by luv2ndamend

Torricelli Must Be Prosecuted to the Fullest Extent of the Law

Judicial Watch Will Pursue the Complaints It Already Has Pending Against the Disgraced New Jersey Senator

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, said today that it rejoices in the resignation from the election race of the corrupt Senator from the State of New Jersey, Robert “The Torch” Torricelli . Senator Torricelli’s withdrawal from the election comes amid growing criticism of Torricelli over ethics violations for bribery and other criminal acts.

Judicial Watch has ethics and other complaints pending against Senator Torricelli, and will pursue those investigations vigorously in order to uncover all of the facts surrounding Torricelli’s misdeeds.

“Senator Torricelli is a national disgrace. He should not be allowed to avoid punishment by simply ‘cutting and running.’ Torricelli may be able to run, but he cannot hide from Judicial Watch,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: diligentstaffofjw; guilty; jail; judicialwatchrules; larryklayman; loser; scumbag; tomfitton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 421-429 next last
To: Howlin
Judicial Watch has ethics and other complaints pending against Senator Torricelli, and will pursue those investigations vigorously in order to uncover all of the facts surrounding Torricelli’s misdeeds.

LOL .. Larry best be careful on what he investigates .. Torricello has family ties ..if ya know what I mean

61 posted on 09/30/2002 7:53:46 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: doughboy
That "national disgrace" sure did an excellent job of exposing Clinton

That National Disgrace exposed what?

And being a friend of Clinton, Liarry did him a service by protecting him from further being investigated by someone who would really prosecute the Clintons.

It is NO sruprise who supports JW and other in name only conservatives around here.

62 posted on 09/30/2002 7:53:56 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
He said DOJ and IRS. Klayman never nailed anyone, that is, unless you include his own flesh and blood mother, and he never will.
63 posted on 09/30/2002 7:55:16 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
Agreed I used to be a fan of Judicial Watch. No more it is a just a scam
64 posted on 09/30/2002 7:55:55 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Yes, a good example. There are others. Bob Bauman to mention one. RMN, the ultimate political sacrifice.

Can you imagine the Washington Post hounding Bob Packwood out of office because he was a boor? Or denying John Tower the office of Secretary of Defense because he was known to attend parties where booze was consumed while nubile Washington women danced on pianos? The shame of it all.
65 posted on 09/30/2002 7:57:11 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I thought he was hoping the DOJ and IRS nailed Klayman and JW for tax evasion-- sorry for my mistake.

I realize that Klayman never actually won anything except he made his Momma cry and settle out of court.


66 posted on 09/30/2002 8:00:58 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
He has family ties, and he doesn't seem to have anything to do after January........LOL.
67 posted on 09/30/2002 8:00:58 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
You may be right. Maybe he is referring to Liarry!!
68 posted on 09/30/2002 8:04:27 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

69 posted on 09/30/2002 8:08:18 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: section9
Hey, if JW works for us in New Jersey, why not welcome Larry back with open arms? At least until he decides to backstab us again, of course.

Yup. But it's as much as he doesn't accomplish very much too. What results did he get from all the lawsuits against the corrupt Clinton administration?

70 posted on 09/30/2002 9:11:27 PM PDT by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Madame Flutterby?

ROFL! That's a keeper.
71 posted on 09/30/2002 9:11:46 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Oh, Jan Crouch (so THAT'S her name) is just so much more ... er ... visually compelling! <|:)~
72 posted on 09/30/2002 9:59:46 PM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
I should have been more specific. I was talking about Senator Toricelli.
73 posted on 10/01/2002 12:07:38 AM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend; goldilucky; FreedominJesusChrist; Landru; ALOHA RONNIE; rodeo-mamma; Snow Bunny
Thank you so much for posting this article!

I agree with Judicial Watch. Resigning isn't enough, and the GOP is now going to have to fight against a new Democrat Candidate that may very well be able to win the election and help throw the Majority in Congress to The Democrats!

As usual, the Democrat party is playing DIRTY POOL!

Boy, Hillary must want to win the White House really, really bad. Even her own must fall to ensure her Victory!

74 posted on 10/01/2002 1:08:03 AM PDT by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
You REALLY are a political naif and you don't bother to read threads. Why are you even a member of FR ? LOL
75 posted on 10/01/2002 1:18:26 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; Fred Mertz
Bump for you! I hope that the Dems don't use this opportunity to win a Majority in Congress!

Someone out there is REALLY scared of Judicial Watch...you can tell by the way they jump on this thread!

But, I'm so glad that Judicial Watch is out there doing GREAT WORK for Liberty and Justice!

Anyone wanting to learn more, go to www.judicialwatch.org

I really love the newsletters I get from JW and the email alerts! I learn so much and it helps me understand the news better especially since the Media is so liberal!

76 posted on 10/01/2002 1:20:47 AM PDT by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
None, NOT A SINGLE PERSON, anywhere, is " afraid of Judicial Watch.

BTW ... Judicial Watch and old Larry had absolutely N-O-T-H-I-N-G to do with the Torch's crazy speech today, his " leaving " the re-election run for the Senate, what will happen to him now, soon, or later, nor the outcome of this Senate race.

If you were to pay attention , instead of seeing only what you imagine is written, you would understand what a sick joke JW and Larry Klayman are. Instead, you choose to think that everyone else , but a few of the remaining gullible naifs, are the ones who are wrong.

Oh well ... enjoy your delusions . :-)

77 posted on 10/01/2002 1:26:38 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
Someone out there is REALLY scared of Judicial Watch...you can tell by the way they jump on this thread! But, I'm so glad that Judicial Watch is out there doing GREAT WORK for Liberty and Justice! Anyone wanting to learn more, go to www.judicialwatch.org I really love the newsletters I get from JW and the email alerts! I learn so much and it helps me understand the news better especially since the Media is so liberal!

Yay Team!! You have to be a plant. No one here is afraid of Judicial Watch, we've learned that Larry is a scam artist. Ask him for an accounting of donations.

But at least you're perky.

78 posted on 10/01/2002 1:31:25 AM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
She's a newbie, who doesn't believe facts and refuses to read FR's archieves; let alone believe what us poor " peons " , who have been here a rather long time and actually remember when Larry posted to FR, say.

" PERKY " ? Wait a few posts; she gets down right nasty and insulting, to those of us who know a conman ( Larry ), when we see one.

79 posted on 10/01/2002 1:36:49 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
" PERKY " ? Wait a few posts; she gets down right nasty and insulting, to those of us who know a conman ( Larry ), when we see one.

I was mislead by the 6!! exclamation points in her post :) Always makes me think of a cheerleader.

80 posted on 10/01/2002 1:45:08 AM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 421-429 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson