Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wednesday, 10/2, Market WrapUp (Silver: A Time to Buy or A Time to Sell?)
Financial Sense Online ^ | 10/2/2002 | James J. Puplava

Posted on 10/02/2002 5:04:51 PM PDT by rohry

 
Weekday Commentary from Jim Puplava
Home

   Silver: A Time to Buy or A Time to Sell?  

Silver Fundamentals or Funny Mentals?
by David Morgan


STORM WATCH UPDATE
Bubble Troubles Part I
Double, double, toil and trouble; fire burn and cauldron bubble.

by Jim Puplava 9/13/2002

Bubble Troubles Part II
Yes, Virginia, There IS
a Housing Bubble
by Jim Puplava 9/20/2002

Bubble Troubles Part III
It Ain't Over Yet
for the Stock Market
by Jim Puplava 9/27/2002


Nyquist Column 10/01
The Party of Obstruction

 Wednesday Market Scoreboard
 October 2, 2002

 Dow Industrials 183.18 7755.61
 Dow Utilities 3.75 214.79
 Dow Transports 89.97 2135.21
 S & P 500 20.00 827.91
 Nasdaq 26.42 1187.31
 US Dollar to Yen 122.78
 US Dollar to Euro

.9871

 Gold 0.60 322.80
 Silver -- 4.485
 Oil 0.34 30.49
 CRB Index 0.49 227.36
 Natural Gas

0.09 4.16
10/02 10/01

Change

  HUI (Amex Gold Bugs Index)

Close
YTD
121.10 122.48 1.38
85.73%
52week High 147.82

06/03/02

52week Low 59.86

11/26/01

  XAU (Philadelphia Gold & Silver)

Close
YTD
67.16

67.62

0.46
23.38%
52week High 88.65

05/28/02

52week Low 49.23

11/19/01

All market indexes


 Market WrapUp for the Week 
Monday  l  Tuesday  l  Wednesday  l  Thursday  l  Friday

The Week in Graphs Storm Watch Geopolitical News Energy Resource Page Precious Metals Raw Materials


Wednesday, October 2, 2002

Corporate Indebtedness
In his fourth and final revised edition of “The Intelligent Investor,” Ben Graham remarked on the increase of indebtedness of American corporations. In his study of company profits and earnings on capital he wrote, “The most striking figures in our table are those for the growth of corporate debt between 1950-1969. It is surprising how little attention has been paid by economists and by Wall Street to this development. The debt has expanded fivefold while their profits before taxes a little more than doubled.” I think Mr. Graham would be even more surprised, if not shocked, by how much that indebtedness has grown over the last decade. Between the years of 1995-2001, business debt jumped by $2.8 trillion, an increase of 69% over previous debt levels. The money was used to buy other companies, for mergers and increasingly to buy back stock to offset dilution of management’s stock option grants. Instead of investing in new plants, equipment and expanding the capital stock of the country, the money was used in all sorts of malinvestments.

The consequences are now unfolding as corporate defaults keep setting new records. Even more worrisome has been the downward spiral in corporate profits. It is profits and the cash flow from an enterprise that supports those debt payments. With profits in decline bankruptcies are rising. According to the Commerce Department’s latest revision of non-financial business profits, they fell from $504.5 billion in 1997 to $333.7 billion in 2001, a drop of 34%. By the first quarter of this year they fell by 42%. This is an unmitigated profit disaster and goes a long way to explaining the now rising trend in corporate debt defaults. Strangely this is given little attention in the financial press. The media and Wall Street tend to remain fixated on pro forma earnings per share, which are absolutely meaningless. In fact, all of the actual forecasts for a strong economic recovery and the constant blather on what great shape the American economy is in completely ignores this debt phenomenon. The more credit that is created, the more debt that business and consumers take on, which is applauded. The fact that very few analysts or economists pay any attention to this matter is of even greater concern.

Our economy and financial markets have run on debt so long that the consequences of a debt implosion are outside the radar screen of most analysts. Only when you get a spate of defaults, such as what we had at the beginning of the year, does it make front-page news. As quickly as it grabbed attention, it has just as quickly faded away. Yet the growth of debt related to income goes on unabated. For example, in 2001 personal income grew by $386.3 billion while personal debt expanded by $614.6 billion. During the bubble years of 1995-2000 household debts grew by $2,164 billion in comparison to household income, which grew by only $1,675 billion. Personal savings in this country are 0.2% of GDP. Americans don’t save; they just borrow money.

The fact that very few are concerned with this matter is all the more surprising. In policy debates one political pundit after another is calling for more government remedies to keep the economy out of recession. We have just gone on the largest debt and spending spree in this nation’s history. Yet nobody expects there to be a hangover.

The cost of carrying debt has fallen for most households. Rising debt burdens has offset this. In the case of businesses, credit spreads continue to widen and credit default premiums continue to rise. Signs of financial stress are everywhere, but we still hear talk about 3-4% economic growth. The recent downturn in major business indicators is signaling another economic downturn much worse than the previous recession. Consumer retrenchment will be added to business retrenchment to broaden the decline.

Now everyone is calling for the government to take action to keep the economy from falling back into recession. No one wants to experience a hangover. However, the government may be powerless to do anything about it. What can they do but reduce interest rates to zero as in Japan, or to start monetizing debt. The best thing government can do is to stand out of the way and allow the economy to cleanse itself. The government could reduce spending and reduce taxes and allow the private economy to regenerate itself. Initially there would be pain, but eventually a renewed cycle would begin that would be much sounder than the present one which is overburdened with debt. Unfortunately, lower taxes and lower spending are not in the works in a town that makes its living by redistributing wealth and expanding the public trough, so a hard recession now is inevitable.

Today in the Markets
Today’s casino results show stocks headed down again making yesterday’s rise another one-day wonder. John Crudele’s piece in yesterday’s New York Post points out a story that everyone knows on Wall Street but seldom mentions--that these one-day, two-day wonders in the stock market are often contrived affairs. The rise last week was due to hedge fund and money managers trying to drive the markets up so quarterly performance would look a tad better. Those efforts were a monumental exertion by professionals to get prices up in order to make an already embarrassing quarter less embarrassing. These one and two-day wonders, as Crudele has pointed out, are technical blips on a bear market radar screen.

Today’s news was headlined by more charges and arrests in the corporate world. Enron’s former chief financial officer, Andrew Fastow, was charged with masterminding a fraud at Enron that cost investors billions. In other developments, Martha Stewart’s broker at Merrill Lynch pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor and is expected to be singing like a canary. The New York District Attorney’s office is expected to make more announcements of further charges and possible arrests. This may lead to a new TV reality show called, “You’ve got cuffs.” Defendants would be brought before a judge like Judge Judy, plead their case, and to add spice to the show, the sentencing would be left to the audience. Viewers could choose from a list of multiple choices for penalties. The show could assuage investor anger, and in the process lift network ratings. Spin-offs could include, “You’ve got stripes,” “On the rocks,” to “You got nailed.” Other possible choices could include guest appearances of Ana Nicole Smith as a sit-in judge. Guest celebrity judges could also help draw in viewers. In the US the political views of entertainers now carry major political clout. Why not afford them the opportunity to be judges as well.

Markets resumed their downward trek, falling for the third day out of four as more corporate earnings disappointments generated renewed selling. Dow Chemical started things off by warning that Q3 profits would be below forecast. Drug companies got hammered on speculation that Schering- Plough will disappoint on their earnings tomorrow. Confidence is evaporating on earnings. Already this week pro forma profits have been lowered even further this quarter to 6.5%, down form 17% in July. Fourth quarter estimates have also been lowered to 19.1% from 27.7% on July 1st.

Major indexes gave back most of their gains from yesterday on above average volume. Two stocks fell for every one that rose on the NYSE. On the Nasdaq losers outdid winners by a 3 to 2 margin. Volume came in at 1.66 billion shares on the big board. The VIX rose by 3.23 points to close at 43.36. The VXN, up 0.91 points, finished at 58.15.

Overseas Markets
European stocks rose, paced by AstraZeneca and Vodafone Group as some investors judged drugmakers and telephone-service providers can maintain sales growth in a slowing economy. The Dow Jones Stoxx 50 Index added 3.8% to 2458.93. The index has climbed 6.2% since Monday's close, when it ended the worst quarter in almost 15 years. The Stoxx 600 Index rose 2.8% as phone companies and drug shares accounted for about a third of the gain.

Japan's Nikkei 225 Stock Average fell to a 19-year low. Banks including Mizuho Holdings Inc. dropped after Mitsubishi Tokyo Financial Group Inc. said it will post a first-half loss, raising concern other lenders may lower their earnings forecasts. The Nikkei lost 1.2% to 9049.33.

Treasury Markets
Treasuries traded higher after some early downside action as investors bid up fixed-income securities amid declines in the stock market. The 10-year Treasury note rose 10/32 to yield 3.68% while the 30-year government bond was up 18/32 to yield 4.72%. No economic data were due out on Wednesday, but Thursday will see the release of August factory orders, the non-manufacturing ISM index and weekly initial claims.

© Copyright Jim Puplava, October 2, 2002



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: economics; investing; stockmarket
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2002 5:04:51 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; bvw; Tauzero; robnoel; kezekiel; ChadGore; Harley - Mississippi; Dukie; Matchett-PI; ...
Market WrapUp is delivered...
2 posted on 10/02/2002 5:05:59 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rohry
they missed the big story of the day - somebody at Bear Stearns blue it and issued sell orders for $5 BILLION in stock (was supposed to be $5 million LOL)
3 posted on 10/02/2002 5:08:27 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
that should be "blew" it ... or maybe, considering the embarassment, "blue" is more appropriate ;)
4 posted on 10/02/2002 5:09:25 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rohry
You know how bearish I've been. Well, my mood has not gotten any better. In fact, I've tried, oh how I tried to find the "good news" in the economy. I've listened to the arguments from those who think that a bottom has been reached, and that this is a good time to buy. I strongly disagree. This is very much not a good time to buy, IMHO.

In fact, I have a very bad feeling that this just might be it, and that the market is about to tank very soon. Think DOW 5000 or less. In about three weeks. That crazy run up a couple of days ago had every earmark of a bear market rally, and that fact that it didn't last 48 hours shows there wasn't much belief in it.

And no, I'm not buying puts. This market is so gimmicked that I'm afraid to buy in anymore, long or short. Too many big boys playing too many games with the markets. The elephants are dancing, this little mouse is safe and snug in his little burrow, waiting for the dancing season to end.

Meanwhile, keep a close eye on the west coast dockworkers strike. This just might end up becoming the proverbial "straw that breaks the camel's back".
5 posted on 10/02/2002 5:12:04 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
From CBS MarketWatch:

"NEW YORK, Oct 02, 2002 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- Bear Stearns placed an erroneous order to sell $4 billion worth of stock late Wednesday at the New York Stock Exchange, but most of the order was canceled before it was executed.

The NYSE said a clerical error caused the brokerage house to enter the order to sell $4 billion worth of Standard & Poor's securities at about 3:40 p.m. - 20 minutes before the stock market closed. The order should have been for $4 million.

All but $622 million of the $4 billion transaction was canceled prior to execution, the NYSE said in a statement.

The NYSE had no further comment. Officials at Bear Stearns were not immediately available for comment."

Richard W.

6 posted on 10/02/2002 5:13:20 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arete
ouch, $622 million versus $4 million... I wonder what the real story is. I mean that's a massive screw up (if it should have been $4m and not $4b).
7 posted on 10/02/2002 5:15:49 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
"And no, I'm not buying puts. This market is so gimmicked that I'm afraid to buy in anymore, long or short. Too many big boys playing too many games with the markets. The elephants are dancing, this little mouse is safe and snug in his little burrow, waiting for the dancing season to end.

Meanwhile, keep a close eye on the west coast dockworkers strike. This just might end up becoming the proverbial 'straw that breaks the camel's back'."


Man, I can't agree with you more...I know the markets are going down but I'm not willing to go short or long...I'm out...
8 posted on 10/02/2002 5:19:59 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
that's a massive screw up

I figured that the traders were working hard all day trying to keep the averages pumped up in spite of all the bad news coming out. I'll bet that their blood ran cold when they saw that sell order. Must have been a Kadak moment.

Richard W.

9 posted on 10/02/2002 5:22:04 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
This market is so gimmicked that I'm afraid to buy in anymore, long or short. Too many big boys playing too many games with the markets.

I'm with you on that. The market is kind of like a casino, which may be why so many people just can't seem to stop playing it. It is just so clear to me that it is being manipulated, yet any hint of a rally and people can't help themselves and pour more money in.

10 posted on 10/02/2002 5:24:56 PM PDT by sangoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arete
Kadak=Kodak -- of it might have been a Kadad moment.

Richard W.

11 posted on 10/02/2002 5:26:31 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sangoo
One of the big "x factors" in the current market is the sheer number of people who have their IRA's and the 401k's on autopilot, dutifully investing more money into the market month after month. If that money goes away then the consequences are obvious.

The single biggest thing I've been looking for is fear on the streets. Real fear. Tearing at your hair and screaming "it's the end" fear. The kind of fear that results in near-total capitulation. I've been waiting for it for quite a while, and we may yet come out of this without having to go through all that. But I doubt it.

Another sign of the financial apocalypse: Cisco traded below $10 a share today. They closed at something like $10.05 and I understand they are down in the aftermarket. If Cisco ends up below $10, and stays there for any length of time, they are going to end up being removed from a lot of portfolios. This is one of the signs I've been waiting for, Cisco at less than $10 a share.

It's getting really interesting out there.
12 posted on 10/02/2002 5:33:33 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rohry
The SM Gales of October come smashing. Everybody wear a whiplash brace.
13 posted on 10/02/2002 5:34:36 PM PDT by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rohry
The pawnbroker (me) says silver is a "buy". I'd like it better at $4-$4.15, but what the heck. It'll be a long day before you see it drop below $4/oz again, so your downside is, what, an 8% drop, and your upside is unlimited.
14 posted on 10/02/2002 5:37:16 PM PDT by Indrid Cold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
It's been rather interesting out there for some time now. It wasn't all that long ago when I remember them discussing on "Wall Street Week" whether 4500 on the Dow was unrealistic. It seems to me that we will reach that level once again, but it may take awhile.
15 posted on 10/02/2002 5:40:34 PM PDT by sangoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: arete
Now we know why their name is Bear Stearns, I guess.
16 posted on 10/02/2002 5:43:26 PM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
Cisco at less than $10 a share.

CSCO is worth $8 or less, so it is still 20% overvalued.

Richard W.

17 posted on 10/02/2002 5:43:45 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Only if the Republicans take both the House and the Senate will I put more money into the market.

Clearly the presence of Democrats in positions of power leads to more taxes, more regulation, and more economic misery.

18 posted on 10/02/2002 6:14:31 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob; arete; rohry
"Meanwhile, keep a close eye on the west coast dockworkers strike. This just might end up becoming the proverbial 'straw that breaks the camel's back'."

At first blush you say "no--this can't be that bad an immediate problem because Bush can always invoke Taft-Hartley and end the strike for 80 days" (and incidentally the cooling off period usually results in a settlement--I have not reviewed the numbers lately but I believe in most cases, the strike has been over for good when the President exercises the power).

Here, however, Bush sees himself under an impediment to use the Taft Hartley provisions because of the impending election--White House thinks shutting the strike down will impair Republican performance in Wisconsin, New Jersey and a couple of other union jurisdictions.

My guess is that at the point the pressure raises a little, Bush will get the injunction but the risk is that they will misestimate the damage and the end result will be a more serious impact on the economy than they expect.

19 posted on 10/02/2002 6:14:42 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Read the latest from Bill Gross.

Knock, Knock, Knockin' on Heaven's Door

Richard W.

20 posted on 10/02/2002 6:21:29 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson