Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The lowest-tech atom bomb
MSNBC ^ | 10/14/02 | By Richard A. Muller

Posted on 10/14/2002 9:17:11 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: taxcontrol
Do you even need computers? Since the work's already been done, would it be enough just to steal/buy the mathematical models themselves?

Art Bell (yeah, I know, tinfoil alert) had an author on last winter who was very pessimistic about containing WMD in the long term, say the next 50-100 years. When the technology gets so cheap and affordable that you can literally build a bomb in your garage, how do you stop the Unabombers/McVeighs/Islamic kooks of the world from blowing civilization, if not back to the stone age, at least back to the feudal age?
21 posted on 10/14/2002 7:45:01 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ZeitgeistSurfer
JMHO, but I think Iran may turn out to be less of a threat as long as we can contain them short term. I don't think the mullahs will be able to stop the democratic revolution that's already simmering there.
22 posted on 10/14/2002 7:47:23 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus
they couldn't and weren't trying to make a Pu239 gun device;

It's true they couldn't make it, but early design work at Los Alamos until July 44 was on the Plutonium gun

Plutonium Complicates Early Gun Work

23 posted on 10/14/2002 8:51:23 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kms61
Actually, they could in theory buy the plans. After they have a viable set of plans, making a bomb should'nt be too difficult - assuming the timing parts are available.

While I don't know Mr Bell, I tend to agree with his assertions. WMD will in short order be obtained by many different governments and NGO's shortly there after. I would estimate another 5 governments joining the nuclear club in the next 20 years (though most will be smart enough not to advertise the fact) and I would say you could start seeing a bomb in the hands of NGO's within 25 - 30 years. However, if there is an overthrow of a nuclear power, it could be within a month.

The principle problem for most bomb makers is how to obtain enough uranium and enrich it, without attracting the attention of authorities. We are not talking small quantities here. I have heard estimates that it takes a couple of tons of raw ore to make enough enriched uranium to make a bomb. Kinda hard to keep a pile of that size under a tarp.
24 posted on 10/15/2002 8:05:41 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson