Skip to comments.
A site in Oregon could shake America's view of history, says Sanjida O'Connell
The Guardian ^
| 10-19-2002
| Sanjida O'Connell
Posted on 10/19/2002 10:11:55 AM PDT by vannrox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
The past is constantly under revision.
1
posted on
10/19/2002 10:11:56 AM PDT
by
vannrox
To: vannrox
At depths of 5m, workers found huge bones, but said nothing and took them home.Took them home for what?
To: vannrox
The past is constantly under revision.So true!
3
posted on
10/19/2002 10:20:24 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: Jonathon Spectre
Took them home for what? Fidosaurus, what else?
To: vannrox
If you thought enough of "dim bulb" Sanjida O'Connell to post this you will just adore
this one
5
posted on
10/19/2002 10:27:46 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
To: vannrox
When the DNA analysis came back, Stenger was in for a shock. The hair did not belong to a native American. Marlo Brandon is going to be pissed.
6
posted on
10/19/2002 10:33:10 AM PDT
by
JZoback
To: vannrox
Scientists assumed they were descendants of native Americans who now claim ownership of ancient human remains.Now that would be a neat trick! Presumably they meant "ancestors", rather than "descendants". Anyway, the DNA analysis is the important news.
To: blam
Ping!
8
posted on
10/19/2002 10:36:56 AM PDT
by
ruoflaw
To: vannrox; blam
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; ruoflaw
10
posted on
10/19/2002 11:10:29 AM PDT
by
blam
To: vannrox
When the DNA analysis came back, Stenger was in for a shock. The hair did not belong to a native American....the results have not been published...
Why the secrecy???
I wanna know WHO the hair belonged to.
To: Jonathon Spectre
LOL
To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
I wanna know WHO the hair belonged to. I'm with you! I read the entire article, and they refused to say who the hair belongs to. Now, if this hiding of the information follows form, then the hair belongs to, what we would now term as, a white person. (Perhaps Asian).
It would be almost comical if it were not so frustrating. Here is an article, devoted to the topic of how the way we have looked at colonization of the North American continent is going to change drastically; yet, they will not give us the key piece of information about how it has changed. P.C. rules.
To: Jonathon Spectre
At depths of 5m, workers found huge bones, but said nothing and took them home.Soup's on!
To: vannrox
"
The hair did not belong to a native American. Baker, who carried out the analysis, says: "It's possible that the so-called paleoindians are not the ancestors of native Americans."Quite possible. Even the Bible alludes to the fact that man walked the Earth long before Adam.
To: nightdriver
Yup
To: vannrox; LibertarianLiz
I was interested in this, so I typed a few keywords into google -- ("Mammoth Park" paleo DNA "land bridge") -- and this is what came up.
Click here
This is a cached article, and pertains directly to the article vanrox posted.
Maybe we can do our own sleuthing and figure out who the hair belongs to!
To: vannrox
I am sure the "Native" Americans would be shocked to learn they "stole" the country from somebody else before the white man came and stole it from them. That would just shoot their history of "we were here first" just all to hell, now wouldn't it?
To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
I wanna know WHO the hair belonged to. There's a 50% chance that it belonged to an Elvisaurus. and a 50$ chance it belonged to an ancient Saudi Arabian terrorist who was crushed inside a cave many moons ago.
19
posted on
10/19/2002 1:26:55 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Stealing 10,000 years ago was more acceptable than stealing 100-200 years ago which is when the american indians were robbed. And the proof of stealing from 10k years ago is not there yet and may never be there.
20
posted on
10/19/2002 6:14:01 PM PDT
by
staytrue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson